GRID M10 8Q vs Radeon Pro 560X
In this comparison between GRID M10 8Q and Radeon Pro 560X you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people GRID M10 8Q will be the best choice, for others Radeon Pro 560X will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
GRID M10 8Q
Radeon Pro 560X is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon Pro 560X is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon Pro 560X here:
Main Specs
GRID M10 8Q | Radeon Pro 560X | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 225 Watt | 75 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | None |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 4 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Check Price |
- GRID M10 8Q has 200% more power consumption, than Radeon Pro 560X.
- GRID M10 8Q is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Radeon Pro 560X uses PCIe 3.0 x8 interface.
- GRID M10 8Q has 4 GB more memory, than Radeon Pro 560X.
- GRID M10 8Q is used in Desktops, and Radeon Pro 560X - in Mobile workstations.
- GRID M10 8Q is build with Maxwell architecture, and Radeon Pro 560X - with Polaris.
- Core clock speed of GRID M10 8Q is 126 MHz higher, than Radeon Pro 560X.
- GRID M10 8Q is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Radeon Pro 560X - by 14 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GRID M10 8Q is 120 MHz higher, than Radeon Pro 560X.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 10−12 |
QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 5−6 |
4K / 2160p | − | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 560X in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 46% more, than GRID M10 8Q. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 30−33 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 24−27 |
QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 9−10 |
4K / 2160p | 4−5 | 7−8 |
low / 720p | 45−50 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 560X in Battlefield 5 is 40% more, than GRID M10 8Q. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 560X in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than GRID M10 8Q. | ||
low / 768p | 190−200 | 220−230 |
medium / 768p | 160−170 | 190−200 |
ultra / 1080p | 85−90 | 110−120 |
QHD / 1440p | 50−55 | 80−85 |
4K / 2160p | 30−33 | 40−45 |
high / 768p | 120−130 | 160−170 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 560X in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 25% more, than GRID M10 8Q. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 560X in Cyberpunk 2077 is 17% more, than GRID M10 8Q. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 110−120 |
medium / 768p | 85−90 | 100−110 |
ultra / 1080p | 55−60 | 75−80 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 560X in Dota 2 is 19% more, than GRID M10 8Q. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 18−20 |
4K / 2160p | 5−6 | 7−8 |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 24−27 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 560X in Far Cry 5 is 38% more, than GRID M10 8Q. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 30−33 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 90−95 | 110−120 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 65−70 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 560X in Fortnite is 28% more, than GRID M10 8Q. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 30−35 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 24−27 |
QHD / 1440p | 7−8 | 12−14 |
4K / 2160p | − | 12−14 |
low / 720p | 45−50 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 560X in Forza Horizon 4 is 45% more, than GRID M10 8Q. | ||
low / 768p | 75−80 | 100−105 |
medium / 768p | 70−75 | 85−90 |
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 14−16 |
QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 5−6 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 560X in Grand Theft Auto V is 32% more, than GRID M10 8Q. | ||
high / 1080p | 8−9 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 9−10 |
4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 24−27 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 560X in Metro Exodus is 50% more, than GRID M10 8Q. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 110−120 |
ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | − |
medium / 1080p | 100−110 | 110−120 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 560X in Minecraft is 9% more, than GRID M10 8Q. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 50−55 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 560X in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 10% more, than GRID M10 8Q. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 9−10 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | − | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 24−27 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 560X in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 33% more, than GRID M10 8Q. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 65−70 |
medium / 768p | 30−33 | 40−45 |
high / 1080p | 16−18 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 12−14 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 7−8 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 560X in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 36% more, than GRID M10 8Q. | ||
low / 768p | 95−100 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 55−60 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 40−45 |
high / 768p | 50−55 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 560X in World of Tanks is 5% more, than GRID M10 8Q. |
Full Specs
GRID M10 8Q | Radeon Pro 560X | |
Architecture | Maxwell | Polaris |
Code name | GM107 | Polaris 21 |
Type | Workstation | Mobile workstation |
Release date | 18 May 2016 | 5 June 2017 |
Pipelines | 640 | 1024 |
Core clock speed | 1033 MHz | 907 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1306 MHz | |
Transistor count | 1,870 million | 3,000 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 14 nm |
Texture fill rate | 52.24 | 64.26 |
Floating-point performance | 1,672 gflops | |
Length | 267 mm | |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 5200 MHz | 5080 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 83.2 GB/s | 81.28 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 (12_0) |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 6.4 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 2.0 |
Vulkan | 1.1.126 | 1.2.131 |
CUDA | 5.0 | |
FreeSync | + | |
Laptop size | large | |
Check Price |