GRID M60 1Q vs Radeon Pro 560X
In this comparison between GRID M60 1Q and Radeon Pro 560X you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people GRID M60 1Q will be the best choice, for others Radeon Pro 560X will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
GRID M60 1Q
Radeon Pro 560X is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon Pro 560X is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon Pro 560X here:
Main Specs
GRID M60 1Q | Radeon Pro 560X | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 225 Watt | 75 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | None |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 4 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Check Price |
- GRID M60 1Q has 200% more power consumption, than Radeon Pro 560X.
- GRID M60 1Q is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Radeon Pro 560X uses PCIe 3.0 x8 interface.
- Radeon Pro 560X has 3 GB more memory, than GRID M60 1Q.
- GRID M60 1Q is used in Desktops, and Radeon Pro 560X - in Mobile workstations.
- GRID M60 1Q is build with Maxwell 2.0 architecture, and Radeon Pro 560X - with Polaris.
- Core clock speed of Radeon Pro 560X is 350 MHz higher, than GRID M60 1Q.
- GRID M60 1Q is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Radeon Pro 560X - by 14 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Radeon Pro 560X is 68 MHz higher, than GRID M60 1Q.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 10−12 |
QHD / 1440p | 7−8 | 5−6 |
4K / 2160p | 5−6 | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 27−30 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 1Q in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 18% more, than Radeon Pro 560X. | ||
high / 1080p | 35−40 | 30−33 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−33 | 24−27 |
QHD / 1440p | 14−16 | 9−10 |
4K / 2160p | 9−10 | 7−8 |
low / 720p | 70−75 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 1Q in Battlefield 5 is 17% more, than Radeon Pro 560X. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
GRID M60 1Q and Radeon Pro 560X have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 230−240 | 220−230 |
medium / 768p | 200−210 | 190−200 |
ultra / 1080p | 120−130 | 110−120 |
QHD / 1440p | 100−105 | 80−85 |
4K / 2160p | 55−60 | 40−45 |
high / 768p | 170−180 | 160−170 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 1Q in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 9% more, than Radeon Pro 560X. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 1Q in Cyberpunk 2077 is 3% more, than Radeon Pro 560X. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 110−120 |
medium / 768p | 110−120 | 100−110 |
ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | 75−80 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 1Q in Dota 2 is 8% more, than Radeon Pro 560X. | ||
high / 1080p | 27−30 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 20−22 | 18−20 |
4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 7−8 |
low / 720p | 55−60 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 27−30 | 24−27 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 1Q in Far Cry 5 is 16% more, than Radeon Pro 560X. | ||
high / 1080p | 35−40 | 30−33 |
ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 130−140 | 110−120 |
medium / 1080p | 75−80 | 65−70 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 1Q in Fortnite is 18% more, than Radeon Pro 560X. | ||
high / 1080p | 35−40 | 30−35 |
ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 24−27 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 12−14 |
4K / 2160p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
low / 720p | 70−75 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 1Q in Forza Horizon 4 is 12% more, than Radeon Pro 560X. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 100−105 |
medium / 768p | 95−100 | 85−90 |
high / 1080p | 40−45 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
QHD / 1440p | 8−9 | 5−6 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 1Q in Grand Theft Auto V is 10% more, than Radeon Pro 560X. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 9−10 |
QHD / 1440p | 10−12 | − |
4K / 2160p | 3−4 | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 1Q in Metro Exodus is 20% more, than Radeon Pro 560X. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 110−120 |
medium / 1080p | 110−120 | 110−120 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 1Q in Minecraft is 4% more, than Radeon Pro 560X. | ||
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 75−80 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 1Q in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 12% more, than Radeon Pro 560X. | ||
high / 1080p | 16−18 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 9−10 |
QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 1Q in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 15% more, than Radeon Pro 560X. | ||
low / 768p | 80−85 | 65−70 |
medium / 768p | 50−55 | 40−45 |
high / 1080p | 27−30 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
4K / 2160p | 9−10 | 7−8 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 1Q in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 23% more, than Radeon Pro 560X. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 40−45 |
high / 768p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
GRID M60 1Q and Radeon Pro 560X have the same average FPS in World of Tanks. |
Full Specs
GRID M60 1Q | Radeon Pro 560X | |
Architecture | Maxwell 2.0 | Polaris |
Code name | GM204 | Polaris 21 |
Type | Workstation | Mobile workstation |
Release date | 30 August 2015 | 5 June 2017 |
Pipelines | 2048 | 1024 |
Core clock speed | 557 MHz | 907 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1178 MHz | |
Transistor count | 5,200 million | 3,000 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 14 nm |
Texture fill rate | 150.8 | 64.26 |
Floating-point performance | 4,833 gflops | |
Length | 267 mm | |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 5012 MHz | 5080 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 160.4 GB/s | 81.28 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 12 (12_0) |
Shader Model | 6.4 | 6.4 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 2.0 |
Vulkan | 1.1.126 | 1.2.131 |
CUDA | 5.2 | |
FreeSync | + | |
Laptop size | large | |
Check Price |