GRID M60 8Q vs Radeon Pro 560X
When comparing GRID M60 8Q and Radeon Pro 560X, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between GRID M60 8Q and Radeon Pro 560X is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
GRID M60 8Q
Radeon Pro 560X is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon Pro 560X is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon Pro 560X here:
Main Specs
GRID M60 8Q | Radeon Pro 560X | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 225 Watt | 75 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | None |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 4 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Check Price |
- GRID M60 8Q has 200% more power consumption, than Radeon Pro 560X.
- GRID M60 8Q is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Radeon Pro 560X uses PCIe 3.0 x8 interface.
- GRID M60 8Q has 4 GB more memory, than Radeon Pro 560X.
- GRID M60 8Q is used in Desktops, and Radeon Pro 560X - in Mobile workstations.
- GRID M60 8Q is build with Maxwell 2.0 architecture, and Radeon Pro 560X - with Polaris.
- Core clock speed of Radeon Pro 560X is 350 MHz higher, than GRID M60 8Q.
- GRID M60 8Q is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Radeon Pro 560X - by 14 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Radeon Pro 560X is 68 MHz higher, than GRID M60 8Q.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 20−22 | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 10−12 |
QHD / 1440p | 6−7 | 5−6 |
4K / 2160p | 5−6 | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 12% more, than Radeon Pro 560X. | ||
high / 1080p | 30−35 | 30−33 |
ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 24−27 |
QHD / 1440p | 10−12 | 9−10 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 7−8 |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in Battlefield 5 is 7% more, than Radeon Pro 560X. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
GRID M60 8Q and Radeon Pro 560X have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 230−240 | 220−230 |
medium / 768p | 200−210 | 190−200 |
ultra / 1080p | 110−120 | 110−120 |
QHD / 1440p | 85−90 | 80−85 |
4K / 2160p | 45−50 | 40−45 |
high / 768p | 160−170 | 160−170 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 3% more, than Radeon Pro 560X. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in Cyberpunk 2077 is 3% more, than Radeon Pro 560X. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 110−120 |
medium / 768p | 100−110 | 100−110 |
ultra / 1080p | 75−80 | 75−80 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in Dota 2 is 3% more, than Radeon Pro 560X. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 7−8 |
low / 720p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 24−27 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in Far Cry 5 is 4% more, than Radeon Pro 560X. | ||
high / 1080p | 30−35 | 30−33 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 120−130 | 110−120 |
medium / 1080p | 70−75 | 65−70 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in Fortnite is 8% more, than Radeon Pro 560X. | ||
high / 1080p | 30−35 | 30−35 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 24−27 |
QHD / 1440p | 12−14 | 12−14 |
4K / 2160p | 12−14 | 12−14 |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 35−40 |
GRID M60 8Q and Radeon Pro 560X have the same average FPS in Forza Horizon 4. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 100−105 |
medium / 768p | 90−95 | 85−90 |
high / 1080p | 40−45 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 14−16 |
QHD / 1440p | 6−7 | 5−6 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in Grand Theft Auto V is 6% more, than Radeon Pro 560X. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 9−10 |
4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in Metro Exodus is 6% more, than Radeon Pro 560X. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 110−120 |
medium / 1080p | 110−120 | 110−120 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in Minecraft is 4% more, than Radeon Pro 560X. | ||
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 70−75 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 6% more, than Radeon Pro 560X. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 9−10 |
QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 20−22 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 5% more, than Radeon Pro 560X. | ||
low / 768p | 70−75 | 65−70 |
medium / 768p | 45−50 | 40−45 |
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 7−8 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 10% more, than Radeon Pro 560X. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 40−45 |
high / 768p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
GRID M60 8Q and Radeon Pro 560X have the same average FPS in World of Tanks. |
Full Specs
GRID M60 8Q | Radeon Pro 560X | |
Architecture | Maxwell 2.0 | Polaris |
Code name | GM204 | Polaris 21 |
Type | Workstation | Mobile workstation |
Release date | 30 August 2015 | 5 June 2017 |
Pipelines | 2048 | 1024 |
Core clock speed | 557 MHz | 907 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1178 MHz | |
Transistor count | 5,200 million | 3,000 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 14 nm |
Texture fill rate | 150.8 | 64.26 |
Floating-point performance | 4,833 gflops | |
Length | 267 mm | |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 5012 MHz | 5080 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 160.4 GB/s | 81.28 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 12 (12_0) |
Shader Model | 6.4 | 6.4 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 2.0 |
Vulkan | 1.1.126 | 1.2.131 |
CUDA | 5.2 | |
FreeSync | + | |
Laptop size | large | |
Check Price |