Quadro T1000 vs Radeon Pro 560X
If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between Quadro T1000 and Radeon Pro 560X, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the Quadro T1000 stacks up against Radeon Pro 560X, check out specs charts below.
Quadro T1000
Radeon Pro 560X is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon Pro 560X is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon Pro 560X here:
Main Specs
| Quadro T1000 | Radeon Pro 560X | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 50 Watt | 75 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | |
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- Radeon Pro 560X has 50% more power consumption, than Quadro T1000.
- Quadro T1000 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Radeon Pro 560X uses PCIe 3.0 x8 interface.
- Quadro T1000 is used in Desktops, and Radeon Pro 560X - in Mobile workstations.
- Quadro T1000 is build with Turing architecture, and Radeon Pro 560X - with Polaris.
- Core clock speed of Quadro T1000 is 488 MHz higher, than Radeon Pro 560X.
- Quadro T1000 is manufactured by 12 nm process technology, and Radeon Pro 560X - by 14 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Quadro T1000 is 2920 MHz higher, than Radeon Pro 560X.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 35−40 | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 10−12 |
| QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 5−6 |
| 4K / 2160p | 10−11 | 4−5 |
| low / 720p | 60−65 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 100% more, than Radeon Pro 560X. | ||
| high / 1080p | 55−60 | 30−33 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 24−27 |
| QHD / 1440p | 35−40 | 9−10 |
| 4K / 2160p | 18−20 | 7−8 |
| low / 720p | 100−110 | 60−65 |
| medium / 1080p | 60−65 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 in Battlefield 5 is 92% more, than Radeon Pro 560X. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| Quadro T1000 and Radeon Pro 560X have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 250−260 | 220−230 |
| medium / 768p | 220−230 | 190−200 |
| ultra / 1080p | 180−190 | 110−120 |
| QHD / 1440p | 110−120 | 80−85 |
| 4K / 2160p | 70−75 | 40−45 |
| high / 768p | 210−220 | 160−170 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 29% more, than Radeon Pro 560X. | ||
| low / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
| medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
| Quadro T1000 and Radeon Pro 560X have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 110−120 |
| medium / 768p | 110−120 | 100−110 |
| ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | 75−80 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 in Dota 2 is 16% more, than Radeon Pro 560X. | ||
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | 18−20 |
| 4K / 2160p | 14−16 | 7−8 |
| low / 720p | 80−85 | 45−50 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 24−27 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 in Far Cry 5 is 79% more, than Radeon Pro 560X. | ||
| high / 1080p | 60−65 | 30−33 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | 14−16 |
| 4K / 2160p | 27−30 | − |
| low / 720p | 180−190 | 110−120 |
| medium / 1080p | 110−120 | 65−70 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 in Fortnite is 74% more, than Radeon Pro 560X. | ||
| high / 1080p | 60−65 | 30−35 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 24−27 |
| QHD / 1440p | 30−35 | 12−14 |
| 4K / 2160p | 24−27 | 12−14 |
| low / 720p | 100−110 | 65−70 |
| medium / 1080p | 65−70 | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 in Forza Horizon 4 is 80% more, than Radeon Pro 560X. | ||
| low / 768p | 140−150 | 100−105 |
| medium / 768p | 120−130 | 85−90 |
| high / 1080p | 70−75 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 14−16 |
| QHD / 1440p | 21−24 | 5−6 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 in Grand Theft Auto V is 61% more, than Radeon Pro 560X. | ||
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 9−10 |
| QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 65−70 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 in Metro Exodus is 106% more, than Radeon Pro 560X. | ||
| low / 768p | 130−140 | 110−120 |
| medium / 1080p | 120−130 | 110−120 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 in Minecraft is 13% more, than Radeon Pro 560X. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 100−110 | 65−70 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 39% more, than Radeon Pro 560X. | ||
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 9−10 |
| QHD / 1440p | 10−11 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 65−70 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 80% more, than Radeon Pro 560X. | ||
| low / 768p | 130−140 | 65−70 |
| medium / 768p | 85−90 | 40−45 |
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 12−14 |
| 4K / 2160p | 16−18 | 7−8 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 106% more, than Radeon Pro 560X. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 40−45 |
| high / 768p | 60−65 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 in World of Tanks is 6% more, than Radeon Pro 560X. | ||
Full Specs
| Quadro T1000 | Radeon Pro 560X | |
| Architecture | Turing | Polaris |
| Code name | TU117 | Polaris 21 |
| Type | Workstation | Mobile workstation |
| Release date | 27 May 2019 | 5 June 2017 |
| Pipelines | 1024 | |
| Core clock speed | 1395 MHz | 907 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 1455 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 4,700 million | 3,000 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 14 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 64.26 | |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | |
| Memory clock speed | 8000 MHz | 5080 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 81.28 GB/s | |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12 (12_0) |
| Shader Model | 6.4 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 2.0 | |
| Vulkan | 1.2.131 | |
| FreeSync | + | |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Check Price |