Radeon Pro 560X vs Tesla M2070 Q
In this comparison between Radeon Pro 560X and Tesla M2070 Q you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people Radeon Pro 560X will be the best choice, for others Tesla M2070 Q will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
Tesla M2070 Q
Radeon Pro 560X is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon Pro 560X is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon Pro 560X here:
Main Specs
Radeon Pro 560X | Tesla M2070 Q | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 75 Watt | 225 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 6 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Check Price |
- Tesla M2070 Q has 200% more power consumption, than Radeon Pro 560X.
- Radeon Pro 560X is connected by PCIe 3.0 x8, and Tesla M2070 Q uses PCIe 2.0 x16 interface.
- Tesla M2070 Q has 2 GB more memory, than Radeon Pro 560X.
- Radeon Pro 560X is used in Mobile workstations, and Tesla M2070 Q - in Desktops.
- Radeon Pro 560X is build with Polaris architecture, and Tesla M2070 Q - with Fermi.
- Core clock speed of Radeon Pro 560X is 333 MHz higher, than Tesla M2070 Q.
- Radeon Pro 560X is manufactured by 14 nm process technology, and Tesla M2070 Q - by 40 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Radeon Pro 560X is 1948 MHz higher, than Tesla M2070 Q.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 18−20 | 3−4 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 1−2 |
QHD / 1440p | 5−6 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 4−5 | − |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 6−7 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 560X in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 266% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
high / 1080p | 30−33 | 8−9 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 6−7 |
QHD / 1440p | 9−10 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | − |
low / 720p | 60−65 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 9−10 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 560X in Battlefield 5 is 245% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | − | 40−45 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 560X in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
low / 768p | 220−230 | 120−130 |
medium / 768p | 190−200 | 100−110 |
ultra / 1080p | 110−120 | 50−55 |
QHD / 1440p | 80−85 | 24−27 |
4K / 2160p | 40−45 | − |
high / 768p | 160−170 | 75−80 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 560X in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 102% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 70−75 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 560X in Cyberpunk 2077 is 22% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
low / 768p | 110−120 | 75−80 |
medium / 768p | 100−110 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 75−80 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 560X in Dota 2 is 80% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 4−5 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 4−5 |
QHD / 1440p | 18−20 | − |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 1−2 |
low / 720p | 45−50 | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 6−7 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 560X in Far Cry 5 is 316% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
high / 1080p | 30−33 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | 14−16 | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 110−120 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 65−70 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 560X in Fortnite is 138% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
high / 1080p | 30−35 | 8−9 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | 12−14 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 12−14 | − |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 10−11 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 560X in Forza Horizon 4 is 233% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
low / 768p | 100−105 | 50−55 |
medium / 768p | 85−90 | − |
high / 1080p | 35−40 | 10−11 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 4−5 |
QHD / 1440p | 5−6 | 0−1 |
medium / 720p | − | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 560X in Grand Theft Auto V is 131% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 2−3 |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 9−10 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 4−5 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 560X in Metro Exodus is 340% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
low / 768p | 110−120 | 85−90 |
high / 1080p | − | 70−75 |
medium / 1080p | 110−120 | − |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 560X in Minecraft is 32% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 560X in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 65% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 7−8 |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 4−5 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | − |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 8−9 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 560X in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 185% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
low / 768p | 65−70 | 20−22 |
medium / 768p | 40−45 | 12−14 |
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 7−8 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 5−6 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 1−2 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 560X in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 233% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 75−80 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | 40−45 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 18−20 |
high / 768p | 55−60 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 560X in World of Tanks is 50% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. |
Full Specs
Radeon Pro 560X | Tesla M2070 Q | |
Architecture | Polaris | Fermi |
Code name | Polaris 21 | GF100 |
Type | Mobile workstation | Workstation |
Release date | 5 June 2017 | 25 July 2011 |
Pipelines | 1024 | 448 |
Core clock speed | 907 MHz | 574 MHz |
Transistor count | 3,000 million | 3,100 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 40 nm |
Texture fill rate | 64.26 | 32.14 |
Floating-point performance | 1,027.7 gflops | |
Length | 248 mm | |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 384 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 5080 MHz | 3132 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 81.28 GB/s | 150.3 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 (12_0) | 12 (11_0) |
Shader Model | 6.4 | 5.1 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 2.0 | 1.1 |
Vulkan | 1.2.131 | N/A |
CUDA | 2.0 | |
FreeSync | + | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 94 Mh/s | |
Laptop size | large | |
Check Price |