Radeon Pro 560X vs Tesla M60
In this comparison between Radeon Pro 560X and Tesla M60 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people Radeon Pro 560X will be the best choice, for others Tesla M60 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
Tesla M60
Radeon Pro 560X is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon Pro 560X is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon Pro 560X here:
Main Specs
Radeon Pro 560X | Tesla M60 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 75 Watt | 300 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | 1x 8-pin |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 8 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Check Price |
- Tesla M60 has 300% more power consumption, than Radeon Pro 560X.
- Radeon Pro 560X is connected by PCIe 3.0 x8, and Tesla M60 uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
- Tesla M60 has 4 GB more memory, than Radeon Pro 560X.
- Radeon Pro 560X is used in Mobile workstations, and Tesla M60 - in Desktops.
- Radeon Pro 560X is build with Polaris architecture, and Tesla M60 - with Maxwell 2.0.
- Core clock speed of Radeon Pro 560X is 350 MHz higher, than Tesla M60.
- Radeon Pro 560X is manufactured by 14 nm process technology, and Tesla M60 - by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Radeon Pro 560X is 68 MHz higher, than Tesla M60.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 18−20 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 24−27 |
QHD / 1440p | 5−6 | 18−20 |
4K / 2160p | 4−5 | 10−11 |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 106% more, than Radeon Pro 560X. | ||
high / 1080p | 30−33 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 50−55 |
QHD / 1440p | 9−10 | 35−40 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 18−20 |
low / 720p | 60−65 | 110−120 |
medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 65−70 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Battlefield 5 is 107% more, than Radeon Pro 560X. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
Radeon Pro 560X and Tesla M60 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 220−230 | 250−260 |
medium / 768p | 190−200 | 220−230 |
ultra / 1080p | 110−120 | 180−190 |
QHD / 1440p | 80−85 | 110−120 |
4K / 2160p | 40−45 | 70−75 |
high / 768p | 160−170 | 210−220 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 29% more, than Radeon Pro 560X. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | − |
medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
Radeon Pro 560X and Tesla M60 have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077. | ||
low / 768p | 110−120 | 120−130 |
medium / 768p | 100−110 | 110−120 |
ultra / 1080p | 75−80 | 100−110 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Dota 2 is 16% more, than Radeon Pro 560X. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 18−20 | 30−33 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 16−18 |
low / 720p | 45−50 | 85−90 |
medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 50−55 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Far Cry 5 is 95% more, than Radeon Pro 560X. | ||
high / 1080p | 30−33 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 50−55 |
QHD / 1440p | 14−16 | 30−33 |
4K / 2160p | − | 27−30 |
low / 720p | 110−120 | 180−190 |
medium / 1080p | 65−70 | 120−130 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Fortnite is 82% more, than Radeon Pro 560X. | ||
high / 1080p | 30−35 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 12−14 | 30−35 |
4K / 2160p | 12−14 | 24−27 |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 110−120 |
medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 70−75 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Forza Horizon 4 is 90% more, than Radeon Pro 560X. | ||
low / 768p | 100−105 | 140−150 |
medium / 768p | 85−90 | 130−140 |
high / 1080p | 35−40 | 75−80 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 30−35 |
QHD / 1440p | 5−6 | 24−27 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Grand Theft Auto V is 69% more, than Radeon Pro 560X. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 18−20 |
4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 9−10 |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 70−75 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Metro Exodus is 120% more, than Radeon Pro 560X. | ||
low / 768p | 110−120 | 130−140 |
medium / 1080p | 110−120 | 120−130 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Minecraft is 13% more, than Radeon Pro 560X. | ||
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 39% more, than Radeon Pro 560X. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 16−18 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 10−12 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 8−9 |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 70−75 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 90% more, than Radeon Pro 560X. | ||
low / 768p | 65−70 | 130−140 |
medium / 768p | 40−45 | 85−90 |
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 50−55 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 27−30 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 113% more, than Radeon Pro 560X. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 55−60 |
high / 768p | 55−60 | − |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in World of Tanks is 7% more, than Radeon Pro 560X. |
Full Specs
Radeon Pro 560X | Tesla M60 | |
Architecture | Polaris | Maxwell 2.0 |
Code name | Polaris 21 | GM204 |
Type | Mobile workstation | Workstation |
Release date | 5 June 2017 | 30 August 2015 |
Pipelines | 1024 | 2048 |
Core clock speed | 907 MHz | 557 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1178 MHz | |
Transistor count | 3,000 million | 5,200 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 64.26 | 150.8 |
Floating-point performance | 2x 4,833 gflops | |
Length | 267 mm | |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 5080 MHz | 5012 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 81.28 GB/s | 160.4 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 (12_0) | 12 (12_1) |
Shader Model | 6.4 | 6.4 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 2.0 | 1.2 |
Vulkan | 1.2.131 | 1.1.126 |
CUDA | 5.2 | |
FreeSync | + | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 432 Mh/s | |
Laptop size | large | |
Check Price |