GeForce GTX 460 SE vs Radeon Pro 570
If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between GeForce GTX 460 SE and Radeon Pro 570, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the GeForce GTX 460 SE stacks up against Radeon Pro 570, check out specs charts below.
GeForce GTX 460 SE
Radeon Pro 570
Main Specs
| GeForce GTX 460 SE | Radeon Pro 570 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 150 Watt | 120 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | 6-pin & 6-pin | None |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 4 GB |
| Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI | No outputs |
- GeForce GTX 460 SE has 25% more power consumption, than Radeon Pro 570.
- GeForce GTX 460 SE is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and Radeon Pro 570 uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
- Radeon Pro 570 has 3 GB more memory, than GeForce GTX 460 SE.
- Both cards are used in Desktops.
- GeForce GTX 460 SE is build with Fermi architecture, and Radeon Pro 570 - with GCN 4.0.
- Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 460 SE is 300 MHz higher, than Radeon Pro 570.
- GeForce GTX 460 SE is manufactured by 40 nm process technology, and Radeon Pro 570 - by 14 nm process technology.
- Radeon Pro 570 is 233 mm longer, than GeForce GTX 460 SE.
- Memory clock speed of Radeon Pro 570 is 5080 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 460 SE.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 9−10 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 16−18 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 10−11 |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 60−65 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 570 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 241% more, than GeForce GTX 460 SE. | ||
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 35−40 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 18−20 |
| low / 720p | 30−35 | 100−110 |
| medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 60−65 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 570 in Battlefield 5 is 257% more, than GeForce GTX 460 SE. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 570 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than GeForce GTX 460 SE. | ||
| low / 768p | 160−170 | 250−260 |
| medium / 768p | 130−140 | 220−230 |
| ultra / 1080p | 65−70 | 180−190 |
| QHD / 1440p | 40−45 | 110−120 |
| 4K / 2160p | 27−30 | 70−75 |
| high / 768p | 100−110 | 210−220 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 570 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 96% more, than GeForce GTX 460 SE. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | − |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 570 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 15% more, than GeForce GTX 460 SE. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 120−130 |
| medium / 768p | 70−75 | 110−120 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 100−110 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 570 in Dota 2 is 64% more, than GeForce GTX 460 SE. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−12 | 45−50 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 40−45 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 27−30 |
| 4K / 2160p | 4−5 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 24−27 | 80−85 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 570 in Far Cry 5 is 291% more, than GeForce GTX 460 SE. | ||
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 27−30 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 27−30 |
| low / 720p | 70−75 | 180−190 |
| medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 110−120 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 570 in Fortnite is 200% more, than GeForce GTX 460 SE. | ||
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 30−35 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 24−27 |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 100−110 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 65−70 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 570 in Forza Horizon 4 is 250% more, than GeForce GTX 460 SE. | ||
| low / 768p | 65−70 | 140−150 |
| medium / 768p | 55−60 | 120−130 |
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | 70−75 |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 30−35 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 570 in Grand Theft Auto V is 144% more, than GeForce GTX 460 SE. | ||
| high / 1080p | 6−7 | 24−27 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 20−22 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 16−18 |
| 4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 8−9 |
| low / 720p | 18−20 | 65−70 |
| medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 570 in Metro Exodus is 287% more, than GeForce GTX 460 SE. | ||
| low / 768p | 100−110 | 130−140 |
| ultra / 1080p | 90−95 | − |
| medium / 1080p | 95−100 | 120−130 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 570 in Minecraft is 28% more, than GeForce GTX 460 SE. | ||
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 40−45 | 100−110 |
| medium / 1080p | 20−22 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 570 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 76% more, than GeForce GTX 460 SE. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 24−27 |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 16−18 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 10−11 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 7−8 |
| low / 720p | 18−20 | 65−70 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 570 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 176% more, than GeForce GTX 460 SE. | ||
| low / 768p | 35−40 | 130−140 |
| medium / 768p | 21−24 | 85−90 |
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 45−50 |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 24−27 |
| 4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 570 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 264% more, than GeForce GTX 460 SE. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 50−55 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 50−55 |
| high / 768p | 40−45 | 60−65 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 570 in World of Tanks is 26% more, than GeForce GTX 460 SE. | ||
Full Specs
| GeForce GTX 460 SE | Radeon Pro 570 | |
| Architecture | Fermi | GCN 4.0 |
| Code name | GF104 | Polaris 20 |
| Type | Desktop | Workstation |
| Release date | 15 November 2010 | 5 June 2017 |
| Pipelines | 288 | 1792 |
| Core clock speed | 1300 MHz | 1000 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 1105 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 1,950 million | 5,700 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 14 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 31.2 billion/sec | 123.8 |
| Floating-point performance | 748.8 gflops | 3,584 gflops |
| Length | 8.25" (210 mm) (21 cm) | 241 mm |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1700 MHz | 6780 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 108.8 GB/s | 217.0 GB/s |
| DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 (12_0) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 6.4 |
| OpenGL | 4.1 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | 2.0 |
| Vulkan | N/A | 1.2.131 |
| CUDA | + | |
| CUDA cores | 288 | |
| Bus support | 16x PCI-E 2.0 | |
| Height | 4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm) | |
| SLI options | + | |
| Multi monitor support | + | |
| HDMI | + | |
| Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
| Audio input for HDMI | Internal | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 48 Mh/s | |
| Number of display connectors | 2 | |