GRID K160Q vs Radeon Pro 570
If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between GRID K160Q and Radeon Pro 570, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the GRID K160Q stacks up against Radeon Pro 570, check out specs charts below.
GRID K160Q
Radeon Pro 570
Main Specs
GRID K160Q | Radeon Pro 570 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 130 Watt | 120 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
Memory type | DDR3 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 4 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
- GRID K160Q has 8% more power consumption, than Radeon Pro 570.
- Both video cards are using PCIe 3.0 x16 interface connection to a motherboard.
- Radeon Pro 570 has 3 GB more memory, than GRID K160Q.
- Both cards are used in Desktops.
- GRID K160Q is build with Kepler architecture, and Radeon Pro 570 - with GCN 4.0.
- Core clock speed of Radeon Pro 570 is 150 MHz higher, than GRID K160Q.
- GRID K160Q is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Radeon Pro 570 - by 14 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Radeon Pro 570 is 4998 MHz higher, than GRID K160Q.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 0−1 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 16−18 |
4K / 2160p | − | 10−11 |
low / 720p | 9−10 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 1−2 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 570 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 940% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 1−2 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 35−40 |
4K / 2160p | − | 18−20 |
low / 720p | 8−9 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 2−3 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 570 in Battlefield 5 is 1675% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
GRID K160Q and Radeon Pro 570 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 250−260 |
medium / 768p | 75−80 | 220−230 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 180−190 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 110−120 |
4K / 2160p | 9−10 | 70−75 |
high / 768p | 50−55 | 210−220 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 570 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 245% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
low / 768p | 70−75 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | − |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
GRID K160Q and Radeon Pro 570 have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077. | ||
low / 768p | 65−70 | 120−130 |
medium / 768p | 35−40 | 110−120 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 100−110 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 570 in Dota 2 is 187% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
high / 1080p | 0−1 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 40−45 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 27−30 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 6−7 | 80−85 |
medium / 1080p | 1−2 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 570 in Far Cry 5 is 1525% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 27−30 |
4K / 2160p | − | 27−30 |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 180−190 |
medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 110−120 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 570 in Fortnite is 552% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
high / 1080p | 0−1 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 30−35 |
4K / 2160p | − | 24−27 |
low / 720p | 10−12 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 65−70 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 570 in Forza Horizon 4 is 1128% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
low / 768p | 35−40 | 140−150 |
medium / 768p | − | 120−130 |
high / 1080p | 0−1 | 70−75 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 30−35 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 21−24 |
medium / 720p | 30−35 | − |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 570 in Grand Theft Auto V is 291% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
high / 1080p | 0−1 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 20−22 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 16−18 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 8−9 |
low / 720p | 0−1 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | − | 30−35 |
low / 768p | 85−90 | 130−140 |
high / 1080p | 50−55 | − |
medium / 1080p | − | 120−130 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 570 in Minecraft is 55% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 570 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 187% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 16−18 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 10−11 |
4K / 2160p | − | 7−8 |
low / 720p | 1−2 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | − | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 570 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 6600% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
low / 768p | 3−4 | 130−140 |
medium / 768p | − | 85−90 |
high / 1080p | 2−3 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 24−27 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 570 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 2933% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
low / 768p | 65−70 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 30−35 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 50−55 |
high / 768p | 27−30 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 570 in World of Tanks is 97% more, than GRID K160Q. |
Full Specs
GRID K160Q | Radeon Pro 570 | |
Architecture | Kepler | GCN 4.0 |
Code name | GK107 | Polaris 20 |
Type | Workstation | Workstation |
Release date | 28 June 2013 | 5 June 2017 |
Pipelines | 192 | 1792 |
Core clock speed | 850 MHz | 1000 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1105 MHz | |
Transistor count | 1,270 million | 5,700 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 14 nm |
Texture fill rate | 13.60 | 123.8 |
Floating-point performance | 326.4 gflops | 3,584 gflops |
Length | 241 mm | |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1782 MHz | 6780 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 28.51 GB/s | 217.0 GB/s |
DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 (12_0) |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 6.4 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 2.0 |
Vulkan | 1.1.126 | 1.2.131 |
CUDA | 3.0 | |