Quadro M2000M vs Radeon Pro 570
When choosing between Quadro M2000M and Radeon Pro 570, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between Quadro M2000M and Radeon Pro 570.
Radeon Pro 570
Quadro M2000M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro M2000M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro M2000M here:
Main Specs
Quadro M2000M | Radeon Pro 570 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 55 Watt | 120 Watt |
Interface | MXM-A (3.0) | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 4 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Check Price |
- Radeon Pro 570 has 118% more power consumption, than Quadro M2000M.
- Quadro M2000M is connected by MXM-A (3.0), and Radeon Pro 570 uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
- Quadro M2000M and Radeon Pro 570 have maximum RAM of 4 GB.
- Quadro M2000M is used in Mobile workstations, and Radeon Pro 570 - in Desktops.
- Quadro M2000M is build with Maxwell architecture, and Radeon Pro 570 - with GCN 4.0.
- Core clock speed of Quadro M2000M is 38 MHz higher, than Radeon Pro 570.
- Quadro M2000M is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Radeon Pro 570 - by 14 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Radeon Pro 570 is 1780 MHz higher, than Quadro M2000M.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 18−20 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 16−18 |
4K / 2160p | 4−5 | 10−11 |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 570 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 100% more, than Quadro M2000M. | ||
high / 1080p | 27−30 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 8−9 | 35−40 |
4K / 2160p | 6−7 | 18−20 |
low / 720p | 60−65 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 570 in Battlefield 5 is 100% more, than Quadro M2000M. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | 50−55 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
Quadro M2000M and Radeon Pro 570 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 220−230 | 250−260 |
medium / 768p | 190−200 | 220−230 |
ultra / 1080p | 110−120 | 180−190 |
QHD / 1440p | 70−75 | 110−120 |
4K / 2160p | 40−45 | 70−75 |
high / 768p | 150−160 | 210−220 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 570 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 32% more, than Quadro M2000M. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | − |
medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
Quadro M2000M and Radeon Pro 570 have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077. | ||
low / 768p | 110−120 | 120−130 |
medium / 768p | 100−110 | 110−120 |
ultra / 1080p | 75−80 | 100−110 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 570 in Dota 2 is 16% more, than Quadro M2000M. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 40−45 |
QHD / 1440p | 18−20 | 27−30 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 45−50 | 80−85 |
medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 570 in Far Cry 5 is 86% more, than Quadro M2000M. | ||
high / 1080p | 27−30 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 14−16 | 27−30 |
4K / 2160p | − | 27−30 |
low / 720p | 110−120 | 180−190 |
medium / 1080p | 65−70 | 110−120 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 570 in Fortnite is 77% more, than Quadro M2000M. | ||
high / 1080p | 30−35 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 10−12 | 30−35 |
4K / 2160p | − | 24−27 |
low / 720p | 60−65 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 65−70 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 570 in Forza Horizon 4 is 90% more, than Quadro M2000M. | ||
low / 768p | 95−100 | 140−150 |
medium / 768p | 85−90 | 120−130 |
high / 1080p | 35−40 | 70−75 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 30−35 |
QHD / 1440p | 5−6 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 570 in Grand Theft Auto V is 64% more, than Quadro M2000M. | ||
high / 1080p | 10−12 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 20−22 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 16−18 |
4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 8−9 |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 570 in Metro Exodus is 106% more, than Quadro M2000M. | ||
low / 768p | 110−120 | 130−140 |
medium / 1080p | 110−120 | 120−130 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 570 in Minecraft is 13% more, than Quadro M2000M. | ||
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 570 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 39% more, than Quadro M2000M. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 16−18 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 10−11 |
4K / 2160p | − | 7−8 |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 570 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 80% more, than Quadro M2000M. | ||
low / 768p | 65−70 | 130−140 |
medium / 768p | 40−45 | 85−90 |
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 24−27 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 570 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 106% more, than Quadro M2000M. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 50−55 |
high / 768p | 55−60 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 570 in World of Tanks is 8% more, than Quadro M2000M. |
Full Specs
Quadro M2000M | Radeon Pro 570 | |
Architecture | Maxwell | GCN 4.0 |
Code name | GM107 | Polaris 20 |
Type | Mobile workstation | Workstation |
Release date | 2 October 2015 | 5 June 2017 |
Pipelines | 640 | 1792 |
Core clock speed | 1038 MHz | 1000 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1197 MHz | 1105 MHz |
Transistor count | 1,870 million | 5,700 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 14 nm |
Texture fill rate | 43.92 | 123.8 |
Floating-point performance | 1,405 gflops | 3,584 gflops |
Length | 241 mm | |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 5000 MHz | 6780 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 80 GB/s | 217.0 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 | 12 (12_0) |
Shader Model | 5.0 | 6.4 |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 2.0 |
Vulkan | 1.1.126 | 1.2.131 |
CUDA | 5.0 | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 173 Mh/s | |
Laptop size | large | |
Optimus | + | |
Display Port | 1.2 | |
3D Vision Pro | + | |
Mosaic | + | |
nView Display Management | + | |
Check Price |