Quadro M600M vs Radeon Pro 570
When choosing between Quadro M600M and Radeon Pro 570, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between Quadro M600M and Radeon Pro 570.
Radeon Pro 570
Quadro M600M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro M600M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro M600M here:
Main Specs
Quadro M600M | Radeon Pro 570 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 30 Watt | 120 Watt |
Interface | MXM-A (3.0) | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 4 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Check Price |
- Radeon Pro 570 has 300% more power consumption, than Quadro M600M.
- Quadro M600M is connected by MXM-A (3.0), and Radeon Pro 570 uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
- Radeon Pro 570 has 2 GB more memory, than Quadro M600M.
- Quadro M600M is used in Mobile workstations, and Radeon Pro 570 - in Desktops.
- Quadro M600M is build with Maxwell architecture, and Radeon Pro 570 - with GCN 4.0.
- Core clock speed of Radeon Pro 570 is 163 MHz higher, than Quadro M600M.
- Quadro M600M is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Radeon Pro 570 - by 14 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Radeon Pro 570 is 1768 MHz higher, than Quadro M600M.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 10−11 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 16−18 |
4K / 2160p | − | 10−11 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 570 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 260% more, than Quadro M600M. | ||
high / 1080p | 16−18 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 35−40 |
4K / 2160p | − | 18−20 |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 570 in Battlefield 5 is 209% more, than Quadro M600M. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 570 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Quadro M600M. | ||
low / 768p | 170−180 | 250−260 |
medium / 768p | 140−150 | 220−230 |
ultra / 1080p | 75−80 | 180−190 |
QHD / 1440p | 40−45 | 110−120 |
4K / 2160p | 30−33 | 70−75 |
high / 768p | 110−120 | 210−220 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 570 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 82% more, than Quadro M600M. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | − |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 570 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 15% more, than Quadro M600M. | ||
low / 768p | 95−100 | 120−130 |
medium / 768p | 75−80 | 110−120 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 100−110 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 570 in Dota 2 is 55% more, than Quadro M600M. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 40−45 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 27−30 |
4K / 2160p | 4−5 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 80−85 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 570 in Far Cry 5 is 235% more, than Quadro M600M. | ||
high / 1080p | 18−20 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 27−30 |
4K / 2160p | − | 27−30 |
low / 720p | 75−80 | 180−190 |
medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 110−120 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 570 in Fortnite is 175% more, than Quadro M600M. | ||
high / 1080p | 18−20 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 30−35 |
4K / 2160p | − | 24−27 |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 65−70 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 570 in Forza Horizon 4 is 231% more, than Quadro M600M. | ||
low / 768p | 65−70 | 140−150 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | 120−130 |
high / 1080p | 20−22 | 70−75 |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 30−35 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 570 in Grand Theft Auto V is 132% more, than Quadro M600M. | ||
high / 1080p | 7−8 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 20−22 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 16−18 |
4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 8−9 |
low / 720p | 20−22 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | 9−10 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 570 in Metro Exodus is 244% more, than Quadro M600M. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 130−140 |
ultra / 1080p | 90−95 | − |
medium / 1080p | 100−105 | 120−130 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 570 in Minecraft is 26% more, than Quadro M600M. | ||
high / 1080p | 18−20 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 20−22 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 570 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 76% more, than Quadro M600M. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 16−18 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 10−11 |
4K / 2160p | − | 7−8 |
low / 720p | 20−22 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 570 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 176% more, than Quadro M600M. | ||
low / 768p | 35−40 | 130−140 |
medium / 768p | 24−27 | 85−90 |
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 24−27 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 570 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 244% more, than Quadro M600M. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 50−55 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 50−55 |
high / 768p | 45−50 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 570 in World of Tanks is 21% more, than Quadro M600M. |
Full Specs
Quadro M600M | Radeon Pro 570 | |
Architecture | Maxwell | GCN 4.0 |
Code name | GM107 | Polaris 20 |
Type | Mobile workstation | Workstation |
Release date | 2 October 2015 | 5 June 2017 |
Pipelines | 384 | 1792 |
Core clock speed | 837 MHz | 1000 MHz |
Boost Clock | 876 MHz | 1105 MHz |
Transistor count | 1,870 million | 5,700 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 14 nm |
Texture fill rate | 14.02 | 123.8 |
Floating-point performance | 863.2 gflops | 3,584 gflops |
Length | 241 mm | |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 5012 MHz | 6780 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 80 GB/s | 217.0 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 | 12 (12_0) |
Shader Model | 5.0 | 6.4 |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 2.0 |
Vulkan | 1.1.126 | 1.2.131 |
CUDA | 5.0 | |
Laptop size | large | |
Optimus | + | |
Display Port | 1.2 | |
3D Vision Pro | + | |
Mosaic | + | |
nView Display Management | + | |
Check Price |