FirePro M4150 vs Radeon Pro 580X
In this comparison between FirePro M4150 and Radeon Pro 580X you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people FirePro M4150 will be the best choice, for others Radeon Pro 580X will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
FirePro M4150
![](/static/img/graphics-card.jpg)
Radeon Pro 580X
![](/static/img/graphics-card.jpg)
Main Specs
FirePro M4150 | Radeon Pro 580X | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 150 Watt | |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 8 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
- FirePro M4150 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x8, and Radeon Pro 580X uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
- Radeon Pro 580X has 7 GB more memory, than FirePro M4150.
- Both cards are used in Desktops.
- FirePro M4150 is build with GCN 1.0 architecture, and Radeon Pro 580X - with GCN 4.0.
- Core clock speed of Radeon Pro 580X is 385 MHz higher, than FirePro M4150.
- FirePro M4150 is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Radeon Pro 580X - by 14 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Radeon Pro 580X is 2780 MHz higher, than FirePro M4150.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 2−3 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 24−27 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 18−20 |
4K / 2160p | − | 10−12 |
low / 720p | 12−14 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 580X in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 716% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 50−55 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 35−40 |
4K / 2160p | − | 20−22 |
low / 720p | 14−16 | 110−120 |
medium / 1080p | 6−7 | 65−70 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 580X in Battlefield 5 is 766% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | 40−45 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
FirePro M4150 and Radeon Pro 580X have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 250−260 |
medium / 768p | 90−95 | 220−230 |
ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 190−200 |
QHD / 1440p | 21−24 | 120−130 |
4K / 2160p | 16−18 | 75−80 |
high / 768p | 65−70 | 210−220 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 580X in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 203% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
low / 768p | 65−70 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | − |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 580X in Cyberpunk 2077 is 5% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
low / 768p | 75−80 | 120−130 |
medium / 768p | 45−50 | 110−120 |
ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 100−110 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 580X in Dota 2 is 139% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
high / 1080p | 2−3 | 50−55 |
ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 30−35 |
4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 16−18 |
low / 720p | 10−12 | 85−90 |
medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 50−55 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 580X in Far Cry 5 is 1175% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
high / 1080p | 10−11 | 65−70 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 50−55 |
QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 30−35 |
4K / 2160p | − | 27−30 |
low / 720p | 50−55 | 180−190 |
medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 120−130 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 580X in Fortnite is 475% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
high / 1080p | 5−6 | 65−70 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 50−55 |
QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 35−40 |
4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 24−27 |
low / 720p | 18−20 | 110−120 |
medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 70−75 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 580X in Forza Horizon 4 is 800% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 140−150 |
medium / 768p | − | 130−140 |
high / 1080p | 4−5 | 75−80 |
ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 35−40 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 24−27 |
medium / 720p | 35−40 | − |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 580X in Grand Theft Auto V is 377% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
high / 1080p | 1−2 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 18−20 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 10−11 |
low / 720p | 4−5 | 70−75 |
medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 580X in Metro Exodus is 1433% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 130−140 |
high / 1080p | 80−85 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 70−75 | − |
medium / 1080p | 85−90 | 120−130 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 580X in Minecraft is 44% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 580X in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 155% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 18−20 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 12−14 |
4K / 2160p | − | 8−9 |
low / 720p | 6−7 | 70−75 |
medium / 1080p | − | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 580X in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 1100% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
low / 768p | 9−10 | 140−150 |
medium / 768p | 8−9 | 90−95 |
high / 1080p | 4−5 | 50−55 |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 27−30 |
4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 580X in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 1240% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
low / 768p | 70−75 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 35−40 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 55−60 |
high / 768p | 30−35 | − |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 580X in World of Tanks is 70% more, than FirePro M4150. |
Full Specs
FirePro M4150 | Radeon Pro 580X | |
Architecture | GCN 1.0 | GCN 4.0 |
Code name | Opal | Polaris 20 |
Type | Workstation | Workstation |
Release date | 16 October 2013 | 18 March 2019 |
Pipelines | 384 | 2304 |
Core clock speed | 715 MHz | 1100 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1200 MHz | |
Transistor count | 950 million | 5,700 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 14 nm |
Texture fill rate | 17.16 | 172.8 |
Floating-point performance | 549.1 gflops | |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 4000 MHz | 6780 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 64 GB/s | 217.0 GB/s |
DirectX | 12 (11_1) | 12 (12_0) |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 6.4 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 2.0 |
Vulkan | 1.2.131 | 1.2.131 |