GeForce GT 640M vs Radeon Pro 580X
In this comparison between GeForce GT 640M and Radeon Pro 580X you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people GeForce GT 640M will be the best choice, for others Radeon Pro 580X will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
Radeon Pro 580X
GeForce GT 640M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce GT 640M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GT 640M here:
Main Specs
GeForce GT 640M | Radeon Pro 580X | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 32 Watt | 150 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
Memory type | DDR3\GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 8 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Check Price |
- Radeon Pro 580X has 368% more power consumption, than GeForce GT 640M.
- Both video cards are using PCIe 3.0 x16 interface connection to a motherboard.
- Radeon Pro 580X has 6 GB more memory, than GeForce GT 640M.
- GeForce GT 640M is used in Laptops, and Radeon Pro 580X - in Desktops.
- GeForce GT 640M is build with Kepler architecture, and Radeon Pro 580X - with GCN 4.0.
- GeForce GT 640M is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Radeon Pro 580X - by 14 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Radeon Pro 580X is 4980 MHz higher, than GeForce GT 640M.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 0−1 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 24−27 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 18−20 |
4K / 2160p | − | 10−12 |
low / 720p | 10−12 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 2−3 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 580X in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 816% more, than GeForce GT 640M. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 50−55 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 35−40 |
4K / 2160p | − | 20−22 |
low / 720p | 12−14 | 110−120 |
medium / 1080p | 4−5 | 65−70 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 580X in Battlefield 5 is 1014% more, than GeForce GT 640M. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
GeForce GT 640M and Radeon Pro 580X have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 110−120 | 250−260 |
medium / 768p | 85−90 | 220−230 |
ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 190−200 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 120−130 |
4K / 2160p | 10−11 | 75−80 |
high / 768p | 55−60 | 210−220 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 580X in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 216% more, than GeForce GT 640M. | ||
low / 768p | 70−75 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
GeForce GT 640M and Radeon Pro 580X have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077. | ||
low / 768p | 70−75 | 120−130 |
medium / 768p | 40−45 | 110−120 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 100−110 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 580X in Dota 2 is 161% more, than GeForce GT 640M. | ||
high / 1080p | 2−3 | 50−55 |
ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 30−35 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 16−18 |
low / 720p | 9−10 | 85−90 |
medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 50−55 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 580X in Far Cry 5 is 1400% more, than GeForce GT 640M. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 65−70 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 50−55 |
QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 30−35 |
4K / 2160p | − | 27−30 |
low / 720p | 45−50 | 180−190 |
medium / 1080p | 7−8 | 120−130 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 580X in Fortnite is 553% more, than GeForce GT 640M. | ||
high / 1080p | 2−3 | 65−70 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 50−55 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 35−40 |
4K / 2160p | − | 24−27 |
low / 720p | 14−16 | 110−120 |
medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 70−75 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 580X in Forza Horizon 4 is 1114% more, than GeForce GT 640M. | ||
low / 768p | 40−45 | 140−150 |
medium / 768p | − | 130−140 |
high / 1080p | 3−4 | 75−80 |
ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 35−40 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 24−27 |
medium / 720p | 30−35 | − |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 580X in Grand Theft Auto V is 437% more, than GeForce GT 640M. | ||
high / 1080p | 1−2 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 18−20 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 10−11 |
low / 720p | 2−3 | 70−75 |
medium / 1080p | 2−3 | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 580X in Metro Exodus is 2200% more, than GeForce GT 640M. | ||
low / 768p | 85−90 | 130−140 |
high / 1080p | 55−60 | − |
medium / 1080p | − | 120−130 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 580X in Minecraft is 55% more, than GeForce GT 640M. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 24−27 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 580X in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 170% more, than GeForce GT 640M. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 18−20 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 12−14 |
4K / 2160p | − | 8−9 |
low / 720p | 3−4 | 70−75 |
medium / 1080p | − | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 580X in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 1400% more, than GeForce GT 640M. | ||
low / 768p | 7−8 | 140−150 |
medium / 768p | 6−7 | 90−95 |
high / 1080p | 3−4 | 50−55 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 27−30 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 580X in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 1820% more, than GeForce GT 640M. | ||
low / 768p | 70−75 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 35−40 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 55−60 |
high / 768p | 27−30 | − |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 580X in World of Tanks is 70% more, than GeForce GT 640M. |
Full Specs
GeForce GT 640M | Radeon Pro 580X | |
Architecture | Kepler | GCN 4.0 |
Code name | N13P-GS | Polaris 20 |
Type | Laptop | Workstation |
Release date | 22 March 2012 | 18 March 2019 |
Pipelines | 384 | 2304 |
Core clock speed | 1100 MHz | |
Boost Clock | 645 MHz | 1200 MHz |
Transistor count | 1,270 million | 5,700 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 14 nm |
Texture fill rate | 172.8 | |
Floating-point performance | 480.0 gflops | |
Memory bus width | 128bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1800 - 4000 MHz | 6780 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 217.0 GB/s | |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 API | 12 (12_0) |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 6.4 |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.1 | 2.0 |
Vulkan | 1.1.126 | 1.2.131 |
CUDA | + | |
CUDA cores | 384 | |
Bus support | PCI Express 2.0, PCI Express 3.0 | |
HDMI | + | |
HDCP | + | |
Maximum VGA resolution | Up to 2048x1536 | |
3D Blu-Ray | + | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 18 Mh/s | |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
Optimus | + | |
Check Price |