GeForce GTX 460 SE vs Radeon Pro 580X
If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between GeForce GTX 460 SE and Radeon Pro 580X, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the GeForce GTX 460 SE stacks up against Radeon Pro 580X, check out specs charts below.
GeForce GTX 460 SE
Radeon Pro 580X
Main Specs
| GeForce GTX 460 SE | Radeon Pro 580X | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 150 Watt | 150 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | 6-pin & 6-pin | None |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 8 GB |
| Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI | No outputs |
- Both graphics cards have the same power consumption of 150 Watt.
- GeForce GTX 460 SE is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and Radeon Pro 580X uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
- Radeon Pro 580X has 7 GB more memory, than GeForce GTX 460 SE.
- Both cards are used in Desktops.
- GeForce GTX 460 SE is build with Fermi architecture, and Radeon Pro 580X - with GCN 4.0.
- Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 460 SE is 200 MHz higher, than Radeon Pro 580X.
- GeForce GTX 460 SE is manufactured by 40 nm process technology, and Radeon Pro 580X - by 14 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Radeon Pro 580X is 5080 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 460 SE.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 9−10 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 24−27 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 18−20 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 10−12 |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 60−65 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 580X in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 258% more, than GeForce GTX 460 SE. | ||
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 50−55 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 35−40 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 20−22 |
| low / 720p | 30−35 | 110−120 |
| medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 65−70 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 580X in Battlefield 5 is 289% more, than GeForce GTX 460 SE. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 580X in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than GeForce GTX 460 SE. | ||
| low / 768p | 160−170 | 250−260 |
| medium / 768p | 130−140 | 220−230 |
| ultra / 1080p | 65−70 | 190−200 |
| QHD / 1440p | 40−45 | 120−130 |
| 4K / 2160p | 27−30 | 75−80 |
| high / 768p | 100−110 | 210−220 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 580X in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 102% more, than GeForce GTX 460 SE. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | − |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 580X in Cyberpunk 2077 is 15% more, than GeForce GTX 460 SE. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 120−130 |
| medium / 768p | 70−75 | 110−120 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 100−110 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 580X in Dota 2 is 64% more, than GeForce GTX 460 SE. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−12 | 50−55 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 30−35 |
| 4K / 2160p | 4−5 | 16−18 |
| low / 720p | 24−27 | 85−90 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 50−55 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 580X in Far Cry 5 is 325% more, than GeForce GTX 460 SE. | ||
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | 65−70 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 50−55 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 30−35 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 27−30 |
| low / 720p | 70−75 | 180−190 |
| medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 120−130 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 580X in Fortnite is 214% more, than GeForce GTX 460 SE. | ||
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | 65−70 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 50−55 |
| QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 35−40 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 24−27 |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 110−120 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 70−75 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 580X in Forza Horizon 4 is 283% more, than GeForce GTX 460 SE. | ||
| low / 768p | 65−70 | 140−150 |
| medium / 768p | 55−60 | 130−140 |
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | 75−80 |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 35−40 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 24−27 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 580X in Grand Theft Auto V is 157% more, than GeForce GTX 460 SE. | ||
| high / 1080p | 6−7 | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 18−20 |
| 4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 10−11 |
| low / 720p | 18−20 | 70−75 |
| medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 580X in Metro Exodus is 325% more, than GeForce GTX 460 SE. | ||
| low / 768p | 100−110 | 130−140 |
| ultra / 1080p | 90−95 | − |
| medium / 1080p | 95−100 | 120−130 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 580X in Minecraft is 28% more, than GeForce GTX 460 SE. | ||
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 40−45 | 100−110 |
| medium / 1080p | 20−22 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 580X in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 76% more, than GeForce GTX 460 SE. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 18−20 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 12−14 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 8−9 |
| low / 720p | 18−20 | 70−75 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 580X in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 207% more, than GeForce GTX 460 SE. | ||
| low / 768p | 35−40 | 140−150 |
| medium / 768p | 21−24 | 90−95 |
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 50−55 |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 27−30 |
| 4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 580X in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 294% more, than GeForce GTX 460 SE. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 50−55 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 55−60 |
| high / 768p | 40−45 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 580X in World of Tanks is 25% more, than GeForce GTX 460 SE. | ||
Full Specs
| GeForce GTX 460 SE | Radeon Pro 580X | |
| Architecture | Fermi | GCN 4.0 |
| Code name | GF104 | Polaris 20 |
| Type | Desktop | Workstation |
| Release date | 15 November 2010 | 18 March 2019 |
| Pipelines | 288 | 2304 |
| Core clock speed | 1300 MHz | 1100 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 1200 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 1,950 million | 5,700 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 14 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 31.2 billion/sec | 172.8 |
| Floating-point performance | 748.8 gflops | |
| Length | 8.25" (210 mm) (21 cm) | |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1700 MHz | 6780 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 108.8 GB/s | 217.0 GB/s |
| DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 (12_0) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 6.4 |
| OpenGL | 4.1 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | 2.0 |
| Vulkan | N/A | 1.2.131 |
| CUDA | + | |
| CUDA cores | 288 | |
| Bus support | 16x PCI-E 2.0 | |
| Height | 4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm) | |
| SLI options | + | |
| Multi monitor support | + | |
| HDMI | + | |
| Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
| Audio input for HDMI | Internal | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 48 Mh/s | |
| Number of display connectors | 2 | |