GeForce GTX 460M vs Radeon Pro 580X
Find out if it is worth upgrading your current GPU setup by comparing GeForce GTX 460M and Radeon Pro 580X. Here you can take a closer look at graphics cards specs, such as core clock speed, memory type and size, display connectors, etc. The price, overall benchmark and gaming performances are usually defining factors when it comes to choosing between GeForce GTX 460M and Radeon Pro 580X. Make sure that the graphics card has compatible dimensions and will properly fit in your new or current computer case. Also these graphics cards may have different system power recommendations, so take that into consideration and upgrade your PSU if necessary.
Radeon Pro 580X
![](/static/img/graphics-card.jpg)
GeForce GTX 460M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce GTX 460M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GTX 460M here:
Main Specs
GeForce GTX 460M | Radeon Pro 580X | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 50 Watt | 150 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 1536 MB | 8 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Check Price |
- Radeon Pro 580X has 200% more power consumption, than GeForce GTX 460M.
- GeForce GTX 460M is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and Radeon Pro 580X uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
- GeForce GTX 460M has 1528 GB more memory, than Radeon Pro 580X.
- GeForce GTX 460M is used in Laptops, and Radeon Pro 580X - in Desktops.
- GeForce GTX 460M is build with Fermi architecture, and Radeon Pro 580X - with GCN 4.0.
- Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 460M is 250 MHz higher, than Radeon Pro 580X.
- GeForce GTX 460M is manufactured by 40 nm process technology, and Radeon Pro 580X - by 14 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Radeon Pro 580X is 5530 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 460M.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 2−3 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 24−27 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 18−20 |
4K / 2160p | − | 10−12 |
low / 720p | 12−14 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 580X in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 600% more, than GeForce GTX 460M. | ||
high / 1080p | 7−8 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 50−55 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 35−40 |
4K / 2160p | − | 20−22 |
low / 720p | 18−20 | 110−120 |
medium / 1080p | 7−8 | 65−70 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 580X in Battlefield 5 is 722% more, than GeForce GTX 460M. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | 40−45 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 580X in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than GeForce GTX 460M. | ||
low / 768p | 110−120 | 250−260 |
medium / 768p | 90−95 | 220−230 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 190−200 |
QHD / 1440p | 24−27 | 120−130 |
4K / 2160p | − | 75−80 |
high / 768p | 65−70 | 210−220 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 580X in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 194% more, than GeForce GTX 460M. | ||
low / 768p | 70−75 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | − |
medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 580X in Cyberpunk 2077 is 5% more, than GeForce GTX 460M. | ||
low / 768p | 75−80 | 120−130 |
medium / 768p | 50−55 | 110−120 |
ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 100−110 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 580X in Dota 2 is 121% more, than GeForce GTX 460M. | ||
high / 1080p | 3−4 | 50−55 |
ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 30−35 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 16−18 |
low / 720p | 12−14 | 85−90 |
medium / 1080p | 4−5 | 50−55 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 580X in Far Cry 5 is 900% more, than GeForce GTX 460M. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 65−70 |
ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 50−55 |
QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 30−35 |
4K / 2160p | − | 27−30 |
low / 720p | 55−60 | 180−190 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 120−130 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 580X in Fortnite is 384% more, than GeForce GTX 460M. | ||
high / 1080p | 6−7 | 65−70 |
ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 50−55 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 35−40 |
4K / 2160p | − | 24−27 |
low / 720p | 18−20 | 110−120 |
medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 70−75 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 580X in Forza Horizon 4 is 660% more, than GeForce GTX 460M. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 140−150 |
medium / 768p | − | 130−140 |
high / 1080p | 8−9 | 75−80 |
ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 35−40 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 24−27 |
medium / 720p | 40−45 | − |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 580X in Grand Theft Auto V is 352% more, than GeForce GTX 460M. | ||
high / 1080p | 1−2 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 18−20 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 10−11 |
low / 720p | 7−8 | 70−75 |
medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 580X in Metro Exodus is 1050% more, than GeForce GTX 460M. | ||
low / 768p | 85−90 | 130−140 |
high / 1080p | 65−70 | − |
medium / 1080p | − | 120−130 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 580X in Minecraft is 55% more, than GeForce GTX 460M. | ||
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 580X in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 155% more, than GeForce GTX 460M. | ||
high / 1080p | 6−7 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 18−20 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 12−14 |
4K / 2160p | − | 8−9 |
low / 720p | 6−7 | 70−75 |
medium / 1080p | − | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 580X in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 700% more, than GeForce GTX 460M. | ||
low / 768p | 16−18 | 140−150 |
medium / 768p | 10−12 | 90−95 |
high / 1080p | 6−7 | 50−55 |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 27−30 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 580X in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 777% more, than GeForce GTX 460M. | ||
low / 768p | 70−75 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 35−40 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 55−60 |
high / 768p | 30−33 | − |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 580X in World of Tanks is 66% more, than GeForce GTX 460M. |
Full Specs
GeForce GTX 460M | Radeon Pro 580X | |
Architecture | Fermi | GCN 4.0 |
Code name | N11E-GS | Polaris 20 |
Type | Laptop | Workstation |
Release date | 3 September 2010 | 18 March 2019 |
Pipelines | 192 | 2304 |
Core clock speed | 1350 MHz | 1100 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1200 MHz | |
Transistor count | 1,170 million | 5,700 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 14 nm |
Texture fill rate | 16.1 billion/sec | 172.8 |
Floating-point performance | 518.4 gflops | |
Memory bus width | 192 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1250 MHz | 6780 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 60.0 GB/s | 217.0 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 API with Feature Level 12.1 | 12 (12_0) |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 6.4 |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.1 | 2.0 |
Vulkan | N/A | 1.2.131 |
CUDA | + | |
SLI options | + | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 33 Mh/s | |
Laptop size | large | |
Check Price |