GeForce GTX 1650 Max Q vs Radeon Pro Duo
When comparing GeForce GTX 1650 Max Q and Radeon Pro Duo, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between GeForce GTX 1650 Max Q and Radeon Pro Duo is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
GeForce GTX 1650 Max Q is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce GTX 1650 Max Q is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GTX 1650 Max Q here:
Main Specs
GeForce GTX 1650 Max Q
Radeon Pro Duo
Power consumption (TDP)
30 Watt
350 Watt
Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors
None
3x 8-pin
Memory type
GDDR5, GDDR6
High Bandwidth Memory (HBM)
Maximum RAM amount
4 GB
8 GB
Display Connectors
No outputs
1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort
Check Price
Check Price
Radeon Pro Duo has 1066% more power consumption, than GeForce GTX 1650 Max Q.
Both video cards are using PCIe 3.0 x16 interface connection to a motherboard.
Radeon Pro Duo has 4 GB more memory, than GeForce GTX 1650 Max Q.
GeForce GTX 1650 Max Q is used in Laptops, and Radeon Pro Duo - in Desktops.
GeForce GTX 1650 Max Q is build with Turing architecture, and Radeon Pro Duo - with GCN 3.0.
GeForce GTX 1650 Max Q is manufactured by 12 nm process technology, and Radeon Pro Duo - by 28 nm process technology.
Memory clock speed of GeForce GTX 1650 Max Q is 7500 MHz higher, than Radeon Pro Duo.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
35−40
50−55
ultra / 1080p
21−24
30−35
QHD / 1440p
16−18
27−30
4K / 2160p
10−11
14−16
low / 720p
60−65
75−80
medium / 1080p
40−45
60−65
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro Duo in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 37% more, than GeForce GTX 1650 Max Q.
high / 1080p
55−60
75−80
ultra / 1080p
45−50
70−75
QHD / 1440p
35−40
50−55
4K / 2160p
18−20
27−30
low / 720p
100−110
130−140
medium / 1080p
60−65
85−90
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro Duo in Battlefield 5 is 38% more, than GeForce GTX 1650 Max Q.
low / 768p
50−55
45−50
QHD / 1440p
0−1
−
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Max Q in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Radeon Pro Duo.
low / 768p
250−260
250−260
medium / 768p
220−230
230−240
ultra / 1080p
180−190
−
QHD / 1440p
110−120
150−160
4K / 2160p
70−75
100−110
high / 768p
210−220
220−230
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro Duo in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 10% more, than GeForce GTX 1650 Max Q.
low / 768p
60−65
70−75
medium / 1080p
55−60
50−55
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro Duo in Cyberpunk 2077 is 3% more, than GeForce GTX 1650 Max Q.
low / 768p
120−130
120−130
medium / 768p
110−120
110−120
ultra / 1080p
100−110
110−120
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro Duo in Dota 2 is 2% more, than GeForce GTX 1650 Max Q.
high / 1080p
45−50
60−65
ultra / 1080p
40−45
60−65
QHD / 1440p
27−30
40−45
4K / 2160p
14−16
21−24
low / 720p
80−85
100−110
medium / 1080p
45−50
65−70
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro Duo in Far Cry 5 is 39% more, than GeForce GTX 1650 Max Q.
high / 1080p
60−65
90−95
ultra / 1080p
45−50
70−75
QHD / 1440p
27−30
45−50
4K / 2160p
27−30
21−24
low / 720p
180−190
220−230
medium / 1080p
110−120
140−150
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro Duo in Fortnite is 29% more, than GeForce GTX 1650 Max Q.
high / 1080p
60−65
85−90
ultra / 1080p
45−50
65−70
QHD / 1440p
30−35
45−50
4K / 2160p
24−27
30−35
low / 720p
100−110
130−140
medium / 1080p
65−70
90−95
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro Duo in Forza Horizon 4 is 37% more, than GeForce GTX 1650 Max Q.
low / 768p
140−150
160−170
medium / 768p
120−130
150−160
high / 1080p
70−75
95−100
ultra / 1080p
30−35
45−50
QHD / 1440p
21−24
40−45
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro Duo in Grand Theft Auto V is 27% more, than GeForce GTX 1650 Max Q.
high / 1080p
24−27
35−40
ultra / 1080p
20−22
30−35
QHD / 1440p
16−18
24−27
4K / 2160p
8−9
14−16
low / 720p
65−70
95−100
medium / 1080p
30−35
50−55
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro Duo in Metro Exodus is 53% more, than GeForce GTX 1650 Max Q.
low / 768p
130−140
120−130
medium / 1080p
120−130
−
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Max Q in Minecraft is 8% more, than Radeon Pro Duo.
high / 1080p
−
75−80
ultra / 1080p
14−16
55−60
4K / 2160p
−
18−20
low / 720p
100−110
120−130
medium / 1080p
18−20
85−90
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro Duo in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 95% more, than GeForce GTX 1650 Max Q.
high / 1080p
24−27
35−40
ultra / 1080p
16−18
24−27
QHD / 1440p
10−11
16−18
4K / 2160p
7−8
10−12
low / 720p
65−70
90−95
medium / 1080p
35−40
55−60
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro Duo in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 48% more, than GeForce GTX 1650 Max Q.
low / 768p
130−140
180−190
medium / 768p
85−90
120−130
high / 1080p
45−50
70−75
ultra / 1080p
24−27
40−45
4K / 2160p
16−18
24−27
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro Duo in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 45% more, than GeForce GTX 1650 Max Q.
low / 768p
90−95
120−130
medium / 768p
60−65
−
ultra / 1080p
50−55
65−70
high / 768p
60−65
−
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro Duo in World of Tanks is 33% more, than GeForce GTX 1650 Max Q.
Full Specs
GeForce GTX 1650 Max Q
Radeon Pro Duo
Architecture
Turing
GCN 3.0
Code name
N18P-G0 / N18P-G61
Capsaicin
Type
Laptop
Workstation
Release date
23 April 2019
26 April 2016
Pipelines
1024
4096
Core clock speed
1020 MHz
Boost Clock
1245 MHz
1000 MHz
Transistor count
4,700 million
8,900 million
Manufacturing process technology
12 nm
28 nm
Texture fill rate
72.00
256.0
Floating-point performance
2x 8,192 gflops
Length
277 mm
Memory bus width
128 Bit
4096 Bit
Memory clock speed
8000 MHz
500 MHz
Memory bandwidth
112.1 GB/s
512 GB/s
Shared memory
-
DirectX
12 (12_1)
Shader Model
6.5
6.0
OpenGL
4.6
4.5
OpenCL
1.2
2.0
Vulkan
1.2.140
+
CUDA
7.5
FreeSync
+
Bus support
PCIe 3.0
HDMI
+
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)
809 Mh/s
Laptop size
medium sized
Eyefinity
+
HD3D
+
PowerTune
+
TrueAudio
+
ZeroCore
+
Mantle
+
Design
reference
Number of Eyefinity displays
6
DisplayPort support
+
CrossFire
+
VCE
+
Compute units
128
AppAcceleration
+
LiquidVR
+
TressFX
+
UVD
+
Enduro
+
FRTC
+
Check Price
Check Price