GRID K260Q vs Radeon Pro Duo

In this comparison between GRID K260Q and Radeon Pro Duo you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people GRID K260Q will be the best choice, for others Radeon Pro Duo will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.

GRID K260Q

Radeon Pro Duo Check Price

Main Specs

	GRID K260Q	Radeon Pro Duo
Power consumption (TDP)	225 Watt	350 Watt
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors		3x 8-pin
Memory type	GDDR5	High Bandwidth Memory (HBM)
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB	8 GB
Display Connectors	No outputs	1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort
		Check Price

Radeon Pro Duo has 55% more power consumption, than GRID K260Q.
Both video cards are using PCIe 3.0 x16 interface connection to a motherboard.
Radeon Pro Duo has 6 GB more memory, than GRID K260Q.
Both cards are used in Desktops.
GRID K260Q is build with Kepler architecture, and Radeon Pro Duo - with GCN 3.0.
GRID K260Q and Radeon Pro Duo are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
Memory clock speed of GRID K260Q is 4500 MHz higher, than Radeon Pro Duo.

Game benchmarks


high / 1080p	14−16	50−55
ultra / 1080p	9−10	30−35
QHD / 1440p	3−4	27−30
4K / 2160p	−	14−16
low / 720p	30−35	75−80
medium / 1080p	18−20	60−65
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro Duo in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 233% more, than GRID K260Q.
high / 1080p	24−27	75−80
ultra / 1080p	21−24	70−75
QHD / 1440p	7−8	50−55
4K / 2160p	5−6	27−30
low / 720p	50−55	130−140
medium / 1080p	27−30	85−90
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro Duo in Battlefield 5 is 226% more, than GRID K260Q.
low / 768p	45−50	45−50
QHD / 1440p	0−1	−
GRID K260Q and Radeon Pro Duo have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone.
low / 768p	210−220	250−260
medium / 768p	180−190	230−240
ultra / 1080p	95−100	−
QHD / 1440p	50−55	150−160
4K / 2160p	30−33	100−110
high / 768p	140−150	220−230
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro Duo in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 56% more, than GRID K260Q.
low / 768p	55−60	70−75
ultra / 1080p	40−45	−
medium / 1080p	45−50	50−55
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro Duo in Cyberpunk 2077 is 19% more, than GRID K260Q.
low / 768p	110−120	120−130
medium / 768p	90−95	110−120
ultra / 1080p	60−65	110−120
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro Duo in Dota 2 is 31% more, than GRID K260Q.
high / 1080p	18−20	60−65
ultra / 1080p	16−18	60−65
QHD / 1440p	−	40−45
4K / 2160p	6−7	21−24
low / 720p	35−40	100−110
medium / 1080p	18−20	65−70
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro Duo in Far Cry 5 is 236% more, than GRID K260Q.
high / 1080p	24−27	90−95
ultra / 1080p	18−20	70−75
QHD / 1440p	16−18	45−50
4K / 2160p	−	21−24
low / 720p	95−100	220−230
medium / 1080p	50−55	140−150
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro Duo in Fortnite is 176% more, than GRID K260Q.
high / 1080p	24−27	85−90
ultra / 1080p	20−22	65−70
QHD / 1440p	9−10	45−50
4K / 2160p	−	30−35
low / 720p	50−55	130−140
medium / 1080p	27−30	90−95
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro Duo in Forza Horizon 4 is 218% more, than GRID K260Q.
low / 768p	85−90	160−170
medium / 768p	75−80	150−160
high / 1080p	30−33	95−100
ultra / 1080p	12−14	45−50
QHD / 1440p	3−4	40−45
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro Duo in Grand Theft Auto V is 140% more, than GRID K260Q.
high / 1080p	9−10	35−40
ultra / 1080p	7−8	30−35
QHD / 1440p	−	24−27
4K / 2160p	2−3	14−16
low / 720p	27−30	95−100
medium / 1080p	12−14	50−55
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro Duo in Metro Exodus is 291% more, than GRID K260Q.
low / 768p	110−120	120−130
ultra / 1080p	100−110	−
medium / 1080p	100−110	−
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro Duo in Minecraft is 8% more, than GRID K260Q.
high / 1080p	21−24	75−80
ultra / 1080p	18−20	55−60
4K / 2160p	−	18−20
low / 720p	55−60	120−130
medium / 1080p	24−27	85−90
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro Duo in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 177% more, than GRID K260Q.
high / 1080p	14−16	35−40
ultra / 1080p	9−10	24−27
QHD / 1440p	0−1	16−18
4K / 2160p	−	10−12
low / 720p	27−30	90−95
medium / 1080p	16−18	55−60
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro Duo in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 211% more, than GRID K260Q.
low / 768p	55−60	180−190
medium / 768p	30−35	120−130
high / 1080p	18−20	70−75
ultra / 1080p	10−12	40−45
4K / 2160p	8−9	24−27
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro Duo in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 260% more, than GRID K260Q.
low / 768p	100−110	120−130
medium / 768p	60−65	−
ultra / 1080p	35−40	65−70
high / 768p	50−55	−
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro Duo in World of Tanks is 35% more, than GRID K260Q.

Full Specs

	GRID K260Q	Radeon Pro Duo
Architecture	Kepler	GCN 3.0
Code name	GK104	Capsaicin
Type	Workstation	Workstation
Release date	28 June 2013	26 April 2016
Pipelines	1536	4096
Core clock speed	745 MHz
Boost Clock		1000 MHz
Transistor count	3,540 million	8,900 million
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	28 nm
Texture fill rate	95.36	256.0
Floating-point performance	2,289 gflops	2x 8,192 gflops
Length		277 mm
Memory bus width	256 Bit	4096 Bit
Memory clock speed	5000 MHz	500 MHz
Memory bandwidth	160.0 GB/s	512 GB/s
DirectX	12 (11_0)
Shader Model	5.1	6.0
OpenGL	4.6	4.5
OpenCL	1.2	2.0
Vulkan	1.1.126	+
CUDA	3.0
FreeSync		+
Bus support		PCIe 3.0
HDMI		+
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)		809 Mh/s
Eyefinity		+
HD3D		+
PowerTune		+
TrueAudio		+
ZeroCore		+
Mantle		+
Design		reference
Number of Eyefinity displays		6
DisplayPort support		+
CrossFire		+
VCE		+
Compute units		128
AppAcceleration		+
LiquidVR		+
TressFX		+
UVD		+
Enduro		+
FRTC		+
		Check Price

GRID K260Q vs Radeon Pro Duo

Main Specs

Game benchmarks

Full Specs

Similar compares