GeForce GTX 1650 Max Q vs Radeon Pro SSG
Find out if it is worth upgrading your current GPU setup by comparing GeForce GTX 1650 Max Q and Radeon Pro SSG. Here you can take a closer look at graphics cards specs, such as core clock speed, memory type and size, display connectors, etc. The price, overall benchmark and gaming performances are usually defining factors when it comes to choosing between GeForce GTX 1650 Max Q and Radeon Pro SSG. Make sure that the graphics card has compatible dimensions and will properly fit in your new or current computer case. Also these graphics cards may have different system power recommendations, so take that into consideration and upgrade your PSU if necessary.
Radeon Pro SSG
GeForce GTX 1650 Max Q is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce GTX 1650 Max Q is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GTX 1650 Max Q here:
Main Specs
GeForce GTX 1650 Max Q | Radeon Pro SSG | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 30 Watt | 350 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin |
Memory type | GDDR5, GDDR6 | HBM2 |
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 16 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | 6x mini-DisplayPort |
Check Price |
- Radeon Pro SSG has 1066% more power consumption, than GeForce GTX 1650 Max Q.
- Both video cards are using PCIe 3.0 x16 interface connection to a motherboard.
- Radeon Pro SSG has 12 GB more memory, than GeForce GTX 1650 Max Q.
- GeForce GTX 1650 Max Q is used in Laptops, and Radeon Pro SSG - in Desktops.
- GeForce GTX 1650 Max Q is build with Turing architecture, and Radeon Pro SSG - with GCN 5.0.
- Core clock speed of Radeon Pro SSG is 420 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 1650 Max Q.
- GeForce GTX 1650 Max Q is manufactured by 12 nm process technology, and Radeon Pro SSG - by 14 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GeForce GTX 1650 Max Q is 6110 MHz higher, than Radeon Pro SSG.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 35−40 | 50−55 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 35−40 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 27−30 |
4K / 2160p | 10−11 | 16−18 |
low / 720p | 60−65 | 80−85 |
medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro SSG in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 43% more, than GeForce GTX 1650 Max Q. | ||
high / 1080p | 55−60 | 80−85 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 75−80 |
QHD / 1440p | 35−40 | 55−60 |
4K / 2160p | 18−20 | 30−35 |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 140−150 |
medium / 1080p | 60−65 | 95−100 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro SSG in Battlefield 5 is 51% more, than GeForce GTX 1650 Max Q. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | − |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Max Q in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Radeon Pro SSG. | ||
low / 768p | 250−260 | 250−260 |
medium / 768p | 220−230 | 230−240 |
ultra / 1080p | 180−190 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 110−120 | 150−160 |
4K / 2160p | 70−75 | 100−110 |
high / 768p | 210−220 | 220−230 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro SSG in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 10% more, than GeForce GTX 1650 Max Q. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 70−75 |
medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 50−55 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro SSG in Cyberpunk 2077 is 3% more, than GeForce GTX 1650 Max Q. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 120−130 |
medium / 768p | 110−120 | 110−120 |
ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | 110−120 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro SSG in Dota 2 is 2% more, than GeForce GTX 1650 Max Q. | ||
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 65−70 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 65−70 |
QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | 45−50 |
4K / 2160p | 14−16 | 24−27 |
low / 720p | 80−85 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 70−75 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro SSG in Far Cry 5 is 48% more, than GeForce GTX 1650 Max Q. | ||
high / 1080p | 60−65 | 100−105 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 75−80 |
QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | 50−55 |
4K / 2160p | 27−30 | 21−24 |
low / 720p | 180−190 | 220−230 |
medium / 1080p | 110−120 | 150−160 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro SSG in Fortnite is 36% more, than GeForce GTX 1650 Max Q. | ||
high / 1080p | 60−65 | 90−95 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 70−75 |
QHD / 1440p | 30−35 | 50−55 |
4K / 2160p | 24−27 | 35−40 |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 140−150 |
medium / 1080p | 65−70 | 95−100 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro SSG in Forza Horizon 4 is 46% more, than GeForce GTX 1650 Max Q. | ||
low / 768p | 140−150 | 160−170 |
medium / 768p | 120−130 | 150−160 |
high / 1080p | 70−75 | 100−110 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 50−55 |
QHD / 1440p | 21−24 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro SSG in Grand Theft Auto V is 32% more, than GeForce GTX 1650 Max Q. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 40−45 |
ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 30−35 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 24−27 |
4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 16−18 |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro SSG in Metro Exodus is 64% more, than GeForce GTX 1650 Max Q. | ||
low / 768p | 130−140 | 120−130 |
medium / 1080p | 120−130 | − |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Max Q in Minecraft is 8% more, than Radeon Pro SSG. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 85−90 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 60−65 |
4K / 2160p | − | 18−20 |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 130−140 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 95−100 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro SSG in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 113% more, than GeForce GTX 1650 Max Q. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 40−45 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 24−27 |
QHD / 1440p | 10−11 | 18−20 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 12−14 |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro SSG in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 62% more, than GeForce GTX 1650 Max Q. | ||
low / 768p | 130−140 | 200−210 |
medium / 768p | 85−90 | 130−140 |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 75−80 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 40−45 |
4K / 2160p | 16−18 | 27−30 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro SSG in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 56% more, than GeForce GTX 1650 Max Q. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 130−140 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 65−70 |
high / 768p | 60−65 | − |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro SSG in World of Tanks is 40% more, than GeForce GTX 1650 Max Q. |
Full Specs
GeForce GTX 1650 Max Q | Radeon Pro SSG | |
Architecture | Turing | GCN 5.0 |
Code name | N18P-G0 / N18P-G61 | Vega 10 |
Type | Laptop | Workstation |
Release date | 23 April 2019 | 8 August 2017 |
Pipelines | 1024 | 4096 |
Core clock speed | 1020 MHz | 1440 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1245 MHz | 1500 MHz |
Transistor count | 4,700 million | 12,500 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 14 nm |
Texture fill rate | 72.00 | 384.0 |
Floating-point performance | 12,288 gflops | |
Length | 267 mm | |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 2048 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 8000 MHz | 1890 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 112.1 GB/s | 483.8 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 12 (12_1) |
Shader Model | 6.5 | 6.4 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 2.0 |
Vulkan | 1.2.140 | 1.1.125 |
CUDA | 7.5 | |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- GeForce GTX 1650 Max Q vs Radeon R9 280X
- GeForce GTX 1650 Max Q vs FirePro W7100
- Radeon Pro SSG vs Radeon R9 280X
- Radeon Pro SSG vs FirePro W7100
- GeForce GTX 1650 Max Q vs GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER
- GeForce GTX 1650 Max Q vs Radeon Instinct MI25 MxGPU
- Radeon Pro SSG vs GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER
- Radeon Pro SSG vs Radeon Instinct MI25 MxGPU