GeForce GTX 1650 mobile vs Radeon Pro SSG
In this comparison between GeForce GTX 1650 mobile and Radeon Pro SSG you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people GeForce GTX 1650 mobile will be the best choice, for others Radeon Pro SSG will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
Radeon Pro SSG
![](/static/img/graphics-card.jpg)
GeForce GTX 1650 mobile is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce GTX 1650 mobile is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GTX 1650 mobile here:
Main Specs
GeForce GTX 1650 mobile | Radeon Pro SSG | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 50 Watt | 350 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin | |
Memory type | GDDR5, GDDR6 | HBM2 |
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 16 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | 6x mini-DisplayPort |
Check Price |
- Radeon Pro SSG has 600% more power consumption, than GeForce GTX 1650 mobile.
- Both video cards are using PCIe 3.0 x16 interface connection to a motherboard.
- Radeon Pro SSG has 12 GB more memory, than GeForce GTX 1650 mobile.
- GeForce GTX 1650 mobile is used in Laptops, and Radeon Pro SSG - in Desktops.
- GeForce GTX 1650 mobile is build with Turing architecture, and Radeon Pro SSG - with GCN 5.0.
- Core clock speed of Radeon Pro SSG is 45 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 1650 mobile.
- GeForce GTX 1650 mobile is manufactured by 12 nm process technology, and Radeon Pro SSG - by 14 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GeForce GTX 1650 mobile is 6110 MHz higher, than Radeon Pro SSG.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 35−40 | 50−55 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 35−40 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 27−30 |
4K / 2160p | 10−11 | 16−18 |
low / 720p | 60−65 | 80−85 |
medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro SSG in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 43% more, than GeForce GTX 1650 mobile. | ||
high / 1080p | 55−60 | 80−85 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 75−80 |
QHD / 1440p | 35−40 | 55−60 |
4K / 2160p | 18−20 | 30−35 |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 140−150 |
medium / 1080p | 60−65 | 95−100 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro SSG in Battlefield 5 is 51% more, than GeForce GTX 1650 mobile. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | − |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 mobile in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Radeon Pro SSG. | ||
low / 768p | 250−260 | 250−260 |
medium / 768p | 220−230 | 230−240 |
ultra / 1080p | 180−190 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 110−120 | 150−160 |
4K / 2160p | 70−75 | 100−110 |
high / 768p | 210−220 | 220−230 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro SSG in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 10% more, than GeForce GTX 1650 mobile. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 70−75 |
medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 50−55 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro SSG in Cyberpunk 2077 is 3% more, than GeForce GTX 1650 mobile. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 120−130 |
medium / 768p | 110−120 | 110−120 |
ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | 110−120 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro SSG in Dota 2 is 2% more, than GeForce GTX 1650 mobile. | ||
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 65−70 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 65−70 |
QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | 45−50 |
4K / 2160p | 14−16 | 24−27 |
low / 720p | 80−85 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 70−75 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro SSG in Far Cry 5 is 48% more, than GeForce GTX 1650 mobile. | ||
high / 1080p | 60−65 | 100−105 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 75−80 |
QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | 50−55 |
4K / 2160p | 27−30 | 21−24 |
low / 720p | 180−190 | 220−230 |
medium / 1080p | 110−120 | 150−160 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro SSG in Fortnite is 36% more, than GeForce GTX 1650 mobile. | ||
high / 1080p | 60−65 | 90−95 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 70−75 |
QHD / 1440p | 30−35 | 50−55 |
4K / 2160p | 24−27 | 35−40 |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 140−150 |
medium / 1080p | 65−70 | 95−100 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro SSG in Forza Horizon 4 is 46% more, than GeForce GTX 1650 mobile. | ||
low / 768p | 140−150 | 160−170 |
medium / 768p | 120−130 | 150−160 |
high / 1080p | 70−75 | 100−110 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 50−55 |
QHD / 1440p | 21−24 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro SSG in Grand Theft Auto V is 32% more, than GeForce GTX 1650 mobile. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 40−45 |
ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 30−35 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 24−27 |
4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 16−18 |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro SSG in Metro Exodus is 64% more, than GeForce GTX 1650 mobile. | ||
low / 768p | 130−140 | 120−130 |
medium / 1080p | 120−130 | − |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 mobile in Minecraft is 8% more, than Radeon Pro SSG. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 85−90 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 60−65 |
4K / 2160p | − | 18−20 |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 130−140 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 95−100 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro SSG in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 113% more, than GeForce GTX 1650 mobile. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 40−45 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 24−27 |
QHD / 1440p | 10−12 | 18−20 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 12−14 |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro SSG in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 62% more, than GeForce GTX 1650 mobile. | ||
low / 768p | 130−140 | 200−210 |
medium / 768p | 85−90 | 130−140 |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 75−80 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 40−45 |
4K / 2160p | 16−18 | 27−30 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro SSG in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 56% more, than GeForce GTX 1650 mobile. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 130−140 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 65−70 |
high / 768p | 60−65 | − |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro SSG in World of Tanks is 40% more, than GeForce GTX 1650 mobile. |
Full Specs
GeForce GTX 1650 mobile | Radeon Pro SSG | |
Architecture | Turing | GCN 5.0 |
Code name | N18P-G0, N18P-G61 | Vega 10 |
Type | Laptop | Workstation |
Release date | 23 April 2019 | 8 August 2017 |
Pipelines | 1024 | 4096 |
Core clock speed | 1395 MHz | 1440 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1560 MHz | 1500 MHz |
Transistor count | 4,700 million | 12,500 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 14 nm |
Texture fill rate | 99.84 | 384.0 |
Floating-point performance | 12,288 gflops | |
Length | 267 mm | |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 2048 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 8000 MHz | 1890 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 192.0 GB/s | 483.8 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 12 (12_1) |
Shader Model | 6.5 | 6.4 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 2.0 |
Vulkan | 1.2.140 | 1.1.125 |
CUDA | 7.5 | |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- GeForce GTX 1650 mobile vs FirePro W8100
- GeForce GTX 1650 mobile vs GeForce GTX 1070 Max Q
- Radeon Pro SSG vs FirePro W8100
- Radeon Pro SSG vs GeForce GTX 1070 Max Q
- GeForce GTX 1650 mobile vs GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER
- GeForce GTX 1650 mobile vs Radeon Instinct MI25 MxGPU
- Radeon Pro SSG vs GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER
- Radeon Pro SSG vs Radeon Instinct MI25 MxGPU