GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q vs Radeon Pro SSG
When choosing between GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q and Radeon Pro SSG, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q and Radeon Pro SSG.
Radeon Pro SSG
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q here:
Main Specs
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q | Radeon Pro SSG | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 50 Watt | 350 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin |
Memory type | GDDR6 | HBM2 |
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 16 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | 6x mini-DisplayPort |
Check Price |
- Radeon Pro SSG has 600% more power consumption, than GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q.
- Both video cards are using PCIe 3.0 x16 interface connection to a motherboard.
- Radeon Pro SSG has 12 GB more memory, than GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q.
- GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q is used in Laptops, and Radeon Pro SSG - in Desktops.
- GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q is build with Turing architecture, and Radeon Pro SSG - with GCN 5.0.
- Core clock speed of Radeon Pro SSG is 405 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q.
- GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q is manufactured by 12 nm process technology, and Radeon Pro SSG - by 14 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q is 8110 MHz higher, than Radeon Pro SSG.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 35−40 | 50−55 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 35−40 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 27−30 |
4K / 2160p | 10−11 | 16−18 |
low / 720p | 60−65 | 80−85 |
medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro SSG in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 43% more, than GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q. | ||
high / 1080p | 55−60 | 80−85 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 75−80 |
QHD / 1440p | 35−40 | 55−60 |
4K / 2160p | 18−20 | 30−35 |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 140−150 |
medium / 1080p | 60−65 | 95−100 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro SSG in Battlefield 5 is 51% more, than GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | − |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Radeon Pro SSG. | ||
low / 768p | 250−260 | 250−260 |
medium / 768p | 220−230 | 230−240 |
ultra / 1080p | 180−190 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 110−120 | 150−160 |
4K / 2160p | 70−75 | 100−110 |
high / 768p | 210−220 | 220−230 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro SSG in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 10% more, than GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 70−75 |
medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 50−55 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro SSG in Cyberpunk 2077 is 3% more, than GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 120−130 |
medium / 768p | 110−120 | 110−120 |
ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | 110−120 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro SSG in Dota 2 is 2% more, than GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q. | ||
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 65−70 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 65−70 |
QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | 45−50 |
4K / 2160p | 14−16 | 24−27 |
low / 720p | 80−85 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 70−75 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro SSG in Far Cry 5 is 48% more, than GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q. | ||
high / 1080p | 60−65 | 100−105 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 75−80 |
QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | 50−55 |
4K / 2160p | 27−30 | 21−24 |
low / 720p | 180−190 | 220−230 |
medium / 1080p | 110−120 | 150−160 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro SSG in Fortnite is 36% more, than GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q. | ||
high / 1080p | 60−65 | 90−95 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 70−75 |
QHD / 1440p | 30−35 | 50−55 |
4K / 2160p | 24−27 | 35−40 |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 140−150 |
medium / 1080p | 65−70 | 95−100 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro SSG in Forza Horizon 4 is 46% more, than GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q. | ||
low / 768p | 140−150 | 160−170 |
medium / 768p | 120−130 | 150−160 |
high / 1080p | 70−75 | 100−110 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 50−55 |
QHD / 1440p | 21−24 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro SSG in Grand Theft Auto V is 32% more, than GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 40−45 |
ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 30−35 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 24−27 |
4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 16−18 |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro SSG in Metro Exodus is 64% more, than GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q. | ||
low / 768p | 130−140 | 120−130 |
medium / 1080p | 120−130 | − |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q in Minecraft is 8% more, than Radeon Pro SSG. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 85−90 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 60−65 |
4K / 2160p | − | 18−20 |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 130−140 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 95−100 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro SSG in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 113% more, than GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 40−45 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 24−27 |
QHD / 1440p | 10−11 | 18−20 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 12−14 |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro SSG in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 62% more, than GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q. | ||
low / 768p | 130−140 | 200−210 |
medium / 768p | 85−90 | 130−140 |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 75−80 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 40−45 |
4K / 2160p | 16−18 | 27−30 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro SSG in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 56% more, than GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 130−140 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 65−70 |
high / 768p | 60−65 | − |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro SSG in World of Tanks is 40% more, than GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q. |
Full Specs
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q | Radeon Pro SSG | |
Architecture | Turing | GCN 5.0 |
Code name | N18P-G62 Max-Q | Vega 10 |
Type | Laptop | Workstation |
Release date | 2 April 2020 | 8 August 2017 |
Pipelines | 1024 | 4096 |
Core clock speed | 1035 MHz | 1440 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1200 MHz | 1500 MHz |
Transistor count | 4,700 million | 12,500 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 14 nm |
Texture fill rate | 76.80 | 384.0 |
Floating-point performance | 12,288 gflops | |
Length | 267 mm | |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 2048 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 10000 MHz | 1890 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 160.0 GB/s | 483.8 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 12 (12_1) |
Shader Model | 6.5 | 6.4 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 2.0 |
Vulkan | 1.2.140 | 1.1.125 |
CUDA | 7.5 | |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q vs Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL
- GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q vs GeForce GTX 960
- Radeon Pro SSG vs Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL
- Radeon Pro SSG vs GeForce GTX 960
- GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q vs GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER
- GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q vs Radeon Instinct MI25 MxGPU
- Radeon Pro SSG vs GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER
- Radeon Pro SSG vs Radeon Instinct MI25 MxGPU