GeForce GTX 965M vs Radeon Pro SSG
In this comparison between GeForce GTX 965M and Radeon Pro SSG you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people GeForce GTX 965M will be the best choice, for others Radeon Pro SSG will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
Radeon Pro SSG
GeForce GTX 965M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce GTX 965M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GTX 965M here:
Main Specs
GeForce GTX 965M | Radeon Pro SSG | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 350 Watt | |
Interface | MXM-B (3.0) | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin |
Memory type | GDDR5 | HBM2 |
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 16 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | 6x mini-DisplayPort |
Check Price |
- GeForce GTX 965M is connected by MXM-B (3.0), and Radeon Pro SSG uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
- Radeon Pro SSG has 12 GB more memory, than GeForce GTX 965M.
- GeForce GTX 965M is used in Laptops, and Radeon Pro SSG - in Desktops.
- GeForce GTX 965M is build with Maxwell architecture, and Radeon Pro SSG - with GCN 5.0.
- Core clock speed of Radeon Pro SSG is 496 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 965M.
- GeForce GTX 965M is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Radeon Pro SSG - by 14 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GeForce GTX 965M is 610 MHz higher, than Radeon Pro SSG.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 20−22 | 50−55 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 35−40 |
QHD / 1440p | 6−7 | 27−30 |
4K / 2160p | 5−6 | 16−18 |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 80−85 |
medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro SSG in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 155% more, than GeForce GTX 965M. | ||
high / 1080p | 30−35 | 80−85 |
ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 75−80 |
QHD / 1440p | 10−12 | 55−60 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 30−35 |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 140−150 |
medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 95−100 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro SSG in Battlefield 5 is 173% more, than GeForce GTX 965M. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | − |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 965M in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Radeon Pro SSG. | ||
low / 768p | 230−240 | 250−260 |
medium / 768p | 200−210 | 230−240 |
ultra / 1080p | 110−120 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 85−90 | 150−160 |
4K / 2160p | 45−50 | 100−110 |
high / 768p | 160−170 | 220−230 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro SSG in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 31% more, than GeForce GTX 965M. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 70−75 |
ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | − |
medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 50−55 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro SSG in Cyberpunk 2077 is 3% more, than GeForce GTX 965M. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 120−130 |
medium / 768p | 100−110 | 110−120 |
ultra / 1080p | 75−80 | 110−120 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro SSG in Dota 2 is 15% more, than GeForce GTX 965M. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 65−70 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 65−70 |
QHD / 1440p | 18−20 | 45−50 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 24−27 |
low / 720p | 50−55 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 27−30 | 70−75 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro SSG in Far Cry 5 is 156% more, than GeForce GTX 965M. | ||
high / 1080p | 30−35 | 100−105 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 75−80 |
QHD / 1440p | 14−16 | 50−55 |
4K / 2160p | − | 21−24 |
low / 720p | 120−130 | 220−230 |
medium / 1080p | 70−75 | 150−160 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro SSG in Fortnite is 125% more, than GeForce GTX 965M. | ||
high / 1080p | 30−35 | 90−95 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 70−75 |
QHD / 1440p | 12−14 | 50−55 |
4K / 2160p | 12−14 | 35−40 |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 140−150 |
medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 95−100 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro SSG in Forza Horizon 4 is 164% more, than GeForce GTX 965M. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 160−170 |
medium / 768p | 90−95 | 150−160 |
high / 1080p | 40−45 | 100−110 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 50−55 |
QHD / 1440p | 7−8 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro SSG in Grand Theft Auto V is 101% more, than GeForce GTX 965M. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 40−45 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 30−35 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 24−27 |
4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 16−18 |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro SSG in Metro Exodus is 194% more, than GeForce GTX 965M. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 120−130 |
medium / 1080p | 110−120 | − |
GeForce GTX 965M and Radeon Pro SSG have the same average FPS in Minecraft. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 85−90 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 60−65 |
4K / 2160p | − | 18−20 |
low / 720p | 70−75 | 130−140 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 95−100 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro SSG in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 180% more, than GeForce GTX 965M. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 40−45 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 24−27 |
QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 18−20 |
4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 12−14 |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 20−22 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro SSG in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 214% more, than GeForce GTX 965M. | ||
low / 768p | 70−75 | 200−210 |
medium / 768p | 45−50 | 130−140 |
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 75−80 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 40−45 |
4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 27−30 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro SSG in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 193% more, than GeForce GTX 965M. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 130−140 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 65−70 |
high / 768p | 55−60 | − |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro SSG in World of Tanks is 50% more, than GeForce GTX 965M. |
Full Specs
GeForce GTX 965M | Radeon Pro SSG | |
Architecture | Maxwell | GCN 5.0 |
Code name | N16E-GS, N16E-GR | Vega 10 |
Type | Laptop | Workstation |
Release date | 5 January 2015 | 8 August 2017 |
Pipelines | 1024 | 4096 |
Core clock speed | 944 MHz | 1440 MHz |
Boost Clock | 950 / 1151 MHz | 1500 MHz |
Transistor count | 2,940 million | 12,500 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 14 nm |
Texture fill rate | 73.60 | 384.0 |
Floating-point performance | 2,355 gflops | 12,288 gflops |
Length | 267 mm | |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 2048 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 2500 MHz | 1890 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 80 GB/s | 483.8 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
G-SYNC support | + | |
DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 12 (12_1) |
Shader Model | 6.4 | 6.4 |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.1 | 2.0 |
Vulkan | 1.1 | 1.1.125 |
CUDA | + | |
CUDA cores | 1024 | |
Bus support | PCI Express 3.0 | |
SLI options | + | |
HDMI | + | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 226 Mh/s | |
Laptop size | large | |
DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) support | + | |
H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder | + | |
Optimus | + | |
GameStream | + | |
GeForce ShadowPlay | + | |
GPU Boost | 2.0 | |
GameWorks | + | |
BatteryBoost | + | |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- GeForce GTX 965M vs Radeon HD 8970M
- GeForce GTX 965M vs Radeon HD 6930
- Radeon Pro SSG vs Radeon HD 8970M
- Radeon Pro SSG vs Radeon HD 6930
- GeForce GTX 965M vs GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER
- GeForce GTX 965M vs Radeon Instinct MI25 MxGPU
- Radeon Pro SSG vs GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER
- Radeon Pro SSG vs Radeon Instinct MI25 MxGPU