GeForce MX350 vs Radeon Pro SSG
If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between GeForce MX350 and Radeon Pro SSG, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the GeForce MX350 stacks up against Radeon Pro SSG, check out specs charts below.
Radeon Pro SSG
GeForce MX350 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce MX350 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce MX350 here:
Main Specs
GeForce MX350 | Radeon Pro SSG | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 20 Watt | 350 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin |
Memory type | GDDR5 | HBM2 |
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 16 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | 6x mini-DisplayPort |
Check Price |
- Radeon Pro SSG has 1650% more power consumption, than GeForce MX350.
- Both video cards are using PCIe 3.0 x16 interface connection to a motherboard.
- Radeon Pro SSG has 14 GB more memory, than GeForce MX350.
- GeForce MX350 is used in Laptops, and Radeon Pro SSG - in Desktops.
- GeForce MX350 is build with Pascal architecture, and Radeon Pro SSG - with GCN 5.0.
- Core clock speed of Radeon Pro SSG is 86 MHz higher, than GeForce MX350.
- GeForce MX350 and Radeon Pro SSG are manufactured by 14 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GeForce MX350 is 5110 MHz higher, than Radeon Pro SSG.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 50−55 |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 35−40 |
QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 27−30 |
4K / 2160p | − | 16−18 |
low / 720p | 30−35 | 80−85 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro SSG in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 225% more, than GeForce MX350. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 80−85 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 75−80 |
QHD / 1440p | 8−9 | 55−60 |
4K / 2160p | 5−6 | 30−35 |
low / 720p | 50−55 | 140−150 |
medium / 1080p | 27−30 | 95−100 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro SSG in Battlefield 5 is 256% more, than GeForce MX350. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | − |
GeForce MX350 and Radeon Pro SSG have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 210−220 | 250−260 |
medium / 768p | 180−190 | 230−240 |
ultra / 1080p | 100−105 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 50−55 | 150−160 |
4K / 2160p | 30−33 | 100−110 |
high / 768p | 140−150 | 220−230 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro SSG in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 56% more, than GeForce MX350. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 70−75 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | − |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro SSG in Cyberpunk 2077 is 19% more, than GeForce MX350. | ||
low / 768p | 110−120 | 120−130 |
medium / 768p | 95−100 | 110−120 |
ultra / 1080p | 65−70 | 110−120 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro SSG in Dota 2 is 26% more, than GeForce MX350. | ||
high / 1080p | 18−20 | 65−70 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 65−70 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 45−50 |
4K / 2160p | 6−7 | 24−27 |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 20−22 | 70−75 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro SSG in Far Cry 5 is 219% more, than GeForce MX350. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 100−105 |
ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 75−80 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 50−55 |
4K / 2160p | − | 21−24 |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 220−230 |
medium / 1080p | 50−55 | 150−160 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro SSG in Fortnite is 177% more, than GeForce MX350. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 90−95 |
ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 70−75 |
QHD / 1440p | 9−10 | 50−55 |
4K / 2160p | − | 35−40 |
low / 720p | 50−55 | 140−150 |
medium / 1080p | 27−30 | 95−100 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro SSG in Forza Horizon 4 is 240% more, than GeForce MX350. | ||
low / 768p | 85−90 | 160−170 |
medium / 768p | 75−80 | 150−160 |
high / 1080p | 30−33 | 100−110 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 50−55 |
QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro SSG in Grand Theft Auto V is 150% more, than GeForce MX350. | ||
high / 1080p | 10−11 | 40−45 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 30−35 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 24−27 |
4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 16−18 |
low / 720p | 30−33 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro SSG in Metro Exodus is 284% more, than GeForce MX350. | ||
low / 768p | 110−120 | 120−130 |
ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | − |
medium / 1080p | 100−110 | − |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro SSG in Minecraft is 8% more, than GeForce MX350. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 85−90 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 60−65 |
4K / 2160p | − | 18−20 |
low / 720p | 55−60 | 130−140 |
medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 95−100 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro SSG in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 206% more, than GeForce MX350. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 40−45 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 24−27 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 18−20 |
4K / 2160p | − | 12−14 |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro SSG in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 241% more, than GeForce MX350. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 200−210 |
medium / 768p | 35−40 | 130−140 |
high / 1080p | 18−20 | 75−80 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 40−45 |
4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 27−30 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro SSG in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 273% more, than GeForce MX350. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 130−140 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 65−70 |
high / 768p | 50−55 | − |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro SSG in World of Tanks is 42% more, than GeForce MX350. |
Full Specs
GeForce MX350 | Radeon Pro SSG | |
Architecture | Pascal | GCN 5.0 |
Code name | N17S-G5 / GP107-670-A1 | Vega 10 |
Type | Laptop | Workstation |
Release date | 20 February 2020 | 8 August 2017 |
Pipelines | 640 | 4096 |
Core clock speed | 1354 MHz | 1440 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1468 MHz | 1500 MHz |
Transistor count | 3,300 million | 12,500 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 14 nm |
Texture fill rate | 29.98 | 384.0 |
Floating-point performance | 12,288 gflops | |
Length | 267 mm | |
Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 2048 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 7000 MHz | 1890 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 56.06 GB/s | 483.8 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 12 (12_1) |
Shader Model | 6.4 | 6.4 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 2.0 |
Vulkan | 1.2.131 | 1.1.125 |
CUDA | 6.1 | |
Optimus | + | |
Check Price |