Quadro K2200M vs Radeon Pro SSG
In this comparison between Quadro K2200M and Radeon Pro SSG you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people Quadro K2200M will be the best choice, for others Radeon Pro SSG will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
Quadro K2200M
Radeon Pro SSG
Main Specs
Quadro K2200M | Radeon Pro SSG | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 65 Watt | 350 Watt |
Interface | MXM-A (3.0) | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin |
Memory type | GDDR5 | HBM2 |
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 16 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | 6x mini-DisplayPort |
- Radeon Pro SSG has 438% more power consumption, than Quadro K2200M.
- Quadro K2200M is connected by MXM-A (3.0), and Radeon Pro SSG uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
- Radeon Pro SSG has 14 GB more memory, than Quadro K2200M.
- Both cards are used in Desktops.
- Quadro K2200M is build with Maxwell architecture, and Radeon Pro SSG - with GCN 5.0.
- Core clock speed of Radeon Pro SSG is 773 MHz higher, than Quadro K2200M.
- Quadro K2200M is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Radeon Pro SSG - by 14 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Quadro K2200M is 3122 MHz higher, than Radeon Pro SSG.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 20−22 | 50−55 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 35−40 |
QHD / 1440p | 6−7 | 27−30 |
4K / 2160p | 5−6 | 16−18 |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 80−85 |
medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro SSG in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 155% more, than Quadro K2200M. | ||
high / 1080p | 30−35 | 80−85 |
ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 75−80 |
QHD / 1440p | 10−12 | 55−60 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 30−35 |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 140−150 |
medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 95−100 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro SSG in Battlefield 5 is 173% more, than Quadro K2200M. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | − |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Radeon Pro SSG. | ||
low / 768p | 230−240 | 250−260 |
medium / 768p | 200−210 | 230−240 |
ultra / 1080p | 110−120 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 85−90 | 150−160 |
4K / 2160p | 45−50 | 100−110 |
high / 768p | 160−170 | 220−230 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro SSG in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 31% more, than Quadro K2200M. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 70−75 |
ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | − |
medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 50−55 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro SSG in Cyberpunk 2077 is 3% more, than Quadro K2200M. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 120−130 |
medium / 768p | 100−110 | 110−120 |
ultra / 1080p | 75−80 | 110−120 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro SSG in Dota 2 is 15% more, than Quadro K2200M. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 65−70 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 65−70 |
QHD / 1440p | 18−20 | 45−50 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 24−27 |
low / 720p | 50−55 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 70−75 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro SSG in Far Cry 5 is 156% more, than Quadro K2200M. | ||
high / 1080p | 30−35 | 100−105 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 75−80 |
QHD / 1440p | 14−16 | 50−55 |
4K / 2160p | − | 21−24 |
low / 720p | 120−130 | 220−230 |
medium / 1080p | 70−75 | 150−160 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro SSG in Fortnite is 125% more, than Quadro K2200M. | ||
high / 1080p | 30−35 | 90−95 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 70−75 |
QHD / 1440p | 12−14 | 50−55 |
4K / 2160p | 12−14 | 35−40 |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 140−150 |
medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 95−100 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro SSG in Forza Horizon 4 is 164% more, than Quadro K2200M. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 160−170 |
medium / 768p | 90−95 | 150−160 |
high / 1080p | 40−45 | 100−110 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 50−55 |
QHD / 1440p | 6−7 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro SSG in Grand Theft Auto V is 101% more, than Quadro K2200M. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 40−45 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 30−35 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 24−27 |
4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 16−18 |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro SSG in Metro Exodus is 194% more, than Quadro K2200M. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 120−130 |
medium / 1080p | 110−120 | − |
Quadro K2200M and Radeon Pro SSG have the same average FPS in Minecraft. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 85−90 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 60−65 |
4K / 2160p | − | 18−20 |
low / 720p | 70−75 | 130−140 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 95−100 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro SSG in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 180% more, than Quadro K2200M. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 40−45 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 24−27 |
QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 18−20 |
4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 12−14 |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 20−22 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro SSG in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 214% more, than Quadro K2200M. | ||
low / 768p | 70−75 | 200−210 |
medium / 768p | 45−50 | 130−140 |
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 75−80 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 40−45 |
4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 27−30 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro SSG in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 193% more, than Quadro K2200M. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 130−140 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 65−70 |
high / 768p | 55−60 | − |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro SSG in World of Tanks is 50% more, than Quadro K2200M. |
Full Specs
Quadro K2200M | Radeon Pro SSG | |
Architecture | Maxwell | GCN 5.0 |
Code name | GM107 | Vega 10 |
Type | Workstation | Workstation |
Release date | 19 July 2014 | 8 August 2017 |
Pipelines | 640 | 4096 |
Core clock speed | 667 MHz | 1440 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1500 MHz | |
Transistor count | 1,870 million | 12,500 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 14 nm |
Texture fill rate | 26.68 | 384.0 |
Floating-point performance | 853.8 gflops | 12,288 gflops |
Length | 267 mm | |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 2048 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 5012 MHz | 1890 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 80 GB/s | 483.8 GB/s |
DirectX | 12 | 12 (12_1) |
Shader Model | 5 | 6.4 |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 2.0 |
Vulkan | 1.1.126 | 1.1.125 |
CUDA | 5.0 | |
Optimus | + | |
Display Port | 1.2 | |
3D Vision Pro | + | |
Mosaic | + | |
nView Display Management | + | |