Quadro M1200 vs Radeon Pro SSG
When comparing Quadro M1200 and Radeon Pro SSG, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between Quadro M1200 and Radeon Pro SSG is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
Radeon Pro SSG
Quadro M1200 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro M1200 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro M1200 here:
Main Specs
Quadro M1200 | Radeon Pro SSG | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 45 Watt | 350 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | HBM2 |
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 16 GB |
Display Connectors | 6x mini-DisplayPort | |
Check Price |
- Radeon Pro SSG has 677% more power consumption, than Quadro M1200.
- Radeon Pro SSG has 12 GB more memory, than Quadro M1200.
- Quadro M1200 is used in Mobile workstations, and Radeon Pro SSG - in Desktops.
- Quadro M1200 is build with Maxwell architecture, and Radeon Pro SSG - with GCN 5.0.
- Core clock speed of Radeon Pro SSG is 449 MHz higher, than Quadro M1200.
- Quadro M1200 is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Radeon Pro SSG - by 14 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Quadro M1200 is 3110 MHz higher, than Radeon Pro SSG.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 18−20 | 50−55 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 35−40 |
QHD / 1440p | 5−6 | 27−30 |
4K / 2160p | 4−5 | 16−18 |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 80−85 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro SSG in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 187% more, than Quadro M1200. | ||
high / 1080p | 27−30 | 80−85 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 75−80 |
QHD / 1440p | 9−10 | 55−60 |
4K / 2160p | 6−7 | 30−35 |
low / 720p | 60−65 | 140−150 |
medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 95−100 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro SSG in Battlefield 5 is 203% more, than Quadro M1200. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | − |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M1200 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Radeon Pro SSG. | ||
low / 768p | 220−230 | 250−260 |
medium / 768p | 190−200 | 230−240 |
ultra / 1080p | 110−120 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 75−80 | 150−160 |
4K / 2160p | 40−45 | 100−110 |
high / 768p | 160−170 | 220−230 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro SSG in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 38% more, than Quadro M1200. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 70−75 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | − |
medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 50−55 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro SSG in Cyberpunk 2077 is 3% more, than Quadro M1200. | ||
low / 768p | 110−120 | 120−130 |
medium / 768p | 100−110 | 110−120 |
ultra / 1080p | 75−80 | 110−120 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro SSG in Dota 2 is 19% more, than Quadro M1200. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 65−70 |
ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 65−70 |
QHD / 1440p | 18−20 | 45−50 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 24−27 |
low / 720p | 45−50 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 70−75 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro SSG in Far Cry 5 is 178% more, than Quadro M1200. | ||
high / 1080p | 30−33 | 100−105 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 75−80 |
QHD / 1440p | 14−16 | 50−55 |
4K / 2160p | − | 21−24 |
low / 720p | 110−120 | 220−230 |
medium / 1080p | 65−70 | 150−160 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro SSG in Fortnite is 144% more, than Quadro M1200. | ||
high / 1080p | 30−35 | 90−95 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 70−75 |
QHD / 1440p | 12−14 | 50−55 |
4K / 2160p | 12−14 | 35−40 |
low / 720p | 60−65 | 140−150 |
medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 95−100 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro SSG in Forza Horizon 4 is 173% more, than Quadro M1200. | ||
low / 768p | 95−100 | 160−170 |
medium / 768p | 85−90 | 150−160 |
high / 1080p | 35−40 | 100−110 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 50−55 |
QHD / 1440p | 5−6 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro SSG in Grand Theft Auto V is 118% more, than Quadro M1200. | ||
high / 1080p | 10−12 | 40−45 |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 30−35 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 24−27 |
4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 16−18 |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro SSG in Metro Exodus is 233% more, than Quadro M1200. | ||
low / 768p | 110−120 | 120−130 |
medium / 1080p | 110−120 | − |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro SSG in Minecraft is 8% more, than Quadro M1200. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 85−90 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 60−65 |
4K / 2160p | − | 18−20 |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 130−140 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 95−100 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro SSG in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 196% more, than Quadro M1200. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 40−45 |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 24−27 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 18−20 |
4K / 2160p | − | 12−14 |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro SSG in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 190% more, than Quadro M1200. | ||
low / 768p | 65−70 | 200−210 |
medium / 768p | 40−45 | 130−140 |
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 75−80 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 40−45 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 27−30 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro SSG in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 223% more, than Quadro M1200. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 130−140 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 65−70 |
high / 768p | 55−60 | − |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro SSG in World of Tanks is 50% more, than Quadro M1200. |
Full Specs
Quadro M1200 | Radeon Pro SSG | |
Architecture | Maxwell | GCN 5.0 |
Code name | N17P-Q1 | Vega 10 |
Type | Mobile workstation | Workstation |
Release date | 13 January 2017 | 8 August 2017 |
Pipelines | 640 | 4096 |
Core clock speed | 991 MHz | 1440 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1150 MHz | 1500 MHz |
Transistor count | 1870 Million | 12,500 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 14 nm |
Texture fill rate | 384.0 | |
Floating-point performance | 12,288 gflops | |
Length | 267 mm | |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 2048 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 5000 MHz | 1890 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 80 GB/s | 483.8 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 | 12 (12_1) |
Shader Model | 5.0 | 6.4 |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 2.0 | |
Vulkan | 1.1.125 | |
Laptop size | large | |
Optimus | + | |
Display Port | 1.2 | |
Mosaic | + | |
nView Display Management | + | |
3D Stereo | + | |
Check Price |