Quadro M3000M vs Radeon Pro SSG
Find out if it is worth upgrading your current GPU setup by comparing Quadro M3000M and Radeon Pro SSG. Here you can take a closer look at graphics cards specs, such as core clock speed, memory type and size, display connectors, etc. The price, overall benchmark and gaming performances are usually defining factors when it comes to choosing between Quadro M3000M and Radeon Pro SSG. Make sure that the graphics card has compatible dimensions and will properly fit in your new or current computer case. Also these graphics cards may have different system power recommendations, so take that into consideration and upgrade your PSU if necessary.
Radeon Pro SSG
Quadro M3000M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro M3000M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro M3000M here:
Main Specs
Quadro M3000M | Radeon Pro SSG | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 75 Watt | 350 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin |
Memory type | GDDR5 | HBM2 |
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 16 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | 6x mini-DisplayPort |
Check Price |
- Radeon Pro SSG has 366% more power consumption, than Quadro M3000M.
- Both video cards are using PCIe 3.0 x16 interface connection to a motherboard.
- Radeon Pro SSG has 12 GB more memory, than Quadro M3000M.
- Quadro M3000M is used in Mobile workstations, and Radeon Pro SSG - in Desktops.
- Quadro M3000M is build with Maxwell architecture, and Radeon Pro SSG - with GCN 5.0.
- Core clock speed of Radeon Pro SSG is 390 MHz higher, than Quadro M3000M.
- Quadro M3000M is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Radeon Pro SSG - by 14 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Quadro M3000M is 3110 MHz higher, than Radeon Pro SSG.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 35−40 | 50−55 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 35−40 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 27−30 |
4K / 2160p | 10−11 | 16−18 |
low / 720p | 60−65 | 80−85 |
medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro SSG in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 43% more, than Quadro M3000M. | ||
high / 1080p | 55−60 | 80−85 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 75−80 |
QHD / 1440p | 35−40 | 55−60 |
4K / 2160p | 18−20 | 30−35 |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 140−150 |
medium / 1080p | 60−65 | 95−100 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro SSG in Battlefield 5 is 51% more, than Quadro M3000M. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | − |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M3000M in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Radeon Pro SSG. | ||
low / 768p | 250−260 | 250−260 |
medium / 768p | 220−230 | 230−240 |
ultra / 1080p | 180−190 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 110−120 | 150−160 |
4K / 2160p | 70−75 | 100−110 |
high / 768p | 210−220 | 220−230 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro SSG in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 10% more, than Quadro M3000M. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 70−75 |
medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 50−55 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro SSG in Cyberpunk 2077 is 3% more, than Quadro M3000M. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 120−130 |
medium / 768p | 110−120 | 110−120 |
ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | 110−120 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro SSG in Dota 2 is 2% more, than Quadro M3000M. | ||
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 65−70 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 65−70 |
QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | 45−50 |
4K / 2160p | 14−16 | 24−27 |
low / 720p | 80−85 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 70−75 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro SSG in Far Cry 5 is 48% more, than Quadro M3000M. | ||
high / 1080p | 60−65 | 100−105 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 75−80 |
QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | 50−55 |
4K / 2160p | 27−30 | 21−24 |
low / 720p | 180−190 | 220−230 |
medium / 1080p | 110−120 | 150−160 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro SSG in Fortnite is 36% more, than Quadro M3000M. | ||
high / 1080p | 60−65 | 90−95 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 70−75 |
QHD / 1440p | 30−35 | 50−55 |
4K / 2160p | 24−27 | 35−40 |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 140−150 |
medium / 1080p | 65−70 | 95−100 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro SSG in Forza Horizon 4 is 46% more, than Quadro M3000M. | ||
low / 768p | 140−150 | 160−170 |
medium / 768p | 120−130 | 150−160 |
high / 1080p | 70−75 | 100−110 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 50−55 |
QHD / 1440p | 21−24 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro SSG in Grand Theft Auto V is 32% more, than Quadro M3000M. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 40−45 |
ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 30−35 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 24−27 |
4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 16−18 |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro SSG in Metro Exodus is 64% more, than Quadro M3000M. | ||
low / 768p | 130−140 | 120−130 |
medium / 1080p | 120−130 | − |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M3000M in Minecraft is 8% more, than Radeon Pro SSG. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 85−90 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 60−65 |
4K / 2160p | − | 18−20 |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 130−140 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 95−100 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro SSG in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 113% more, than Quadro M3000M. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 40−45 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 24−27 |
QHD / 1440p | 10−11 | 18−20 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 12−14 |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro SSG in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 62% more, than Quadro M3000M. | ||
low / 768p | 130−140 | 200−210 |
medium / 768p | 85−90 | 130−140 |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 75−80 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 40−45 |
4K / 2160p | 16−18 | 27−30 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro SSG in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 56% more, than Quadro M3000M. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 130−140 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 65−70 |
high / 768p | 60−65 | − |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro SSG in World of Tanks is 40% more, than Quadro M3000M. |
Full Specs
Quadro M3000M | Radeon Pro SSG | |
Architecture | Maxwell | GCN 5.0 |
Code name | GM204 | Vega 10 |
Type | Mobile workstation | Workstation |
Release date | 2 October 2015 | 8 August 2017 |
Pipelines | 1,024 | 4096 |
Core clock speed | 1050 MHz | 1440 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1500 MHz | |
Transistor count | 5,200 million | 12,500 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 14 nm |
Texture fill rate | 67.20 | 384.0 |
Floating-point performance | 2,150 gflops | 12,288 gflops |
Length | 267 mm | |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 2048 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 5000 MHz | 1890 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 160 GB/s | 483.8 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 | 12 (12_1) |
Shader Model | 5.0 | 6.4 |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 2.0 |
Vulkan | 1.1.126 | 1.1.125 |
CUDA | 5.2 | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 253 Mh/s | |
Laptop size | large | |
Optimus | + | |
Display Port | 1.2 | |
3D Vision Pro | + | |
Mosaic | + | |
nView Display Management | + | |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- Quadro M3000M vs Radeon R9 280
- Quadro M3000M vs Radeon Pro 5300M
- Radeon Pro SSG vs Radeon R9 280
- Radeon Pro SSG vs Radeon Pro 5300M
- Quadro M3000M vs GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER
- Quadro M3000M vs Radeon Instinct MI25 MxGPU
- Radeon Pro SSG vs GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER
- Radeon Pro SSG vs Radeon Instinct MI25 MxGPU