Quadro P3200 vs Radeon Pro SSG
When comparing Quadro P3200 and Radeon Pro SSG, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between Quadro P3200 and Radeon Pro SSG is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
Radeon Pro SSG
![](/static/img/graphics-card.jpg)
Quadro P3200 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro P3200 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro P3200 here:
Main Specs
Quadro P3200 | Radeon Pro SSG | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 350 Watt | |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | HBM2 |
Maximum RAM amount | 6084 MB | 16 GB |
Display Connectors | 6x mini-DisplayPort | |
Check Price |
- Quadro P3200 has 6068 GB more memory, than Radeon Pro SSG.
- Quadro P3200 is used in Mobile workstations, and Radeon Pro SSG - in Desktops.
- Quadro P3200 is build with Pascal architecture, and Radeon Pro SSG - with GCN 5.0.
- Core clock speed of Radeon Pro SSG is 732 MHz higher, than Quadro P3200.
- Quadro P3200 is manufactured by 16 nm process technology, and Radeon Pro SSG - by 14 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Quadro P3200 is 5118 MHz higher, than Radeon Pro SSG.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 40−45 | 50−55 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 35−40 |
QHD / 1440p | 20−22 | 27−30 |
4K / 2160p | 10−12 | 16−18 |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 80−85 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro SSG in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 31% more, than Quadro P3200. | ||
high / 1080p | 60−65 | 80−85 |
ultra / 1080p | 55−60 | 75−80 |
QHD / 1440p | 40−45 | 55−60 |
4K / 2160p | 21−24 | 30−35 |
low / 720p | 110−120 | 140−150 |
medium / 1080p | 70−75 | 95−100 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro SSG in Battlefield 5 is 32% more, than Quadro P3200. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | − |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P3200 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Radeon Pro SSG. | ||
low / 768p | 250−260 | 250−260 |
medium / 768p | 220−230 | 230−240 |
ultra / 1080p | 190−200 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 120−130 | 150−160 |
4K / 2160p | 80−85 | 100−110 |
high / 768p | 210−220 | 220−230 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro SSG in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 8% more, than Quadro P3200. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 70−75 |
medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 50−55 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro SSG in Cyberpunk 2077 is 3% more, than Quadro P3200. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 120−130 |
medium / 768p | 110−120 | 110−120 |
ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | 110−120 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro SSG in Dota 2 is 2% more, than Quadro P3200. | ||
high / 1080p | 50−55 | 65−70 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 65−70 |
QHD / 1440p | 30−35 | 45−50 |
4K / 2160p | 16−18 | 24−27 |
low / 720p | 85−90 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 50−55 | 70−75 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro SSG in Far Cry 5 is 33% more, than Quadro P3200. | ||
high / 1080p | 65−70 | 100−105 |
ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 75−80 |
QHD / 1440p | 30−35 | 50−55 |
4K / 2160p | 27−30 | 21−24 |
low / 720p | 190−200 | 220−230 |
medium / 1080p | 120−130 | 150−160 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro SSG in Fortnite is 26% more, than Quadro P3200. | ||
high / 1080p | 65−70 | 90−95 |
ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 70−75 |
QHD / 1440p | 35−40 | 50−55 |
4K / 2160p | 27−30 | 35−40 |
low / 720p | 110−120 | 140−150 |
medium / 1080p | 70−75 | 95−100 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro SSG in Forza Horizon 4 is 32% more, than Quadro P3200. | ||
low / 768p | 140−150 | 160−170 |
medium / 768p | 130−140 | 150−160 |
high / 1080p | 75−80 | 100−110 |
ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 50−55 |
QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro SSG in Grand Theft Auto V is 25% more, than Quadro P3200. | ||
high / 1080p | 27−30 | 40−45 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 30−35 |
QHD / 1440p | 18−20 | 24−27 |
4K / 2160p | 10−11 | 16−18 |
low / 720p | 75−80 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro SSG in Metro Exodus is 43% more, than Quadro P3200. | ||
low / 768p | 130−140 | 120−130 |
medium / 1080p | 120−130 | − |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P3200 in Minecraft is 8% more, than Radeon Pro SSG. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 85−90 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 60−65 |
4K / 2160p | − | 18−20 |
low / 720p | 110−120 | 130−140 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 95−100 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro SSG in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 100% more, than Quadro P3200. | ||
high / 1080p | 27−30 | 40−45 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 24−27 |
QHD / 1440p | 12−14 | 18−20 |
4K / 2160p | 9−10 | 12−14 |
low / 720p | 75−80 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro SSG in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 41% more, than Quadro P3200. | ||
low / 768p | 140−150 | 200−210 |
medium / 768p | 95−100 | 130−140 |
high / 1080p | 50−55 | 75−80 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−33 | 40−45 |
4K / 2160p | 18−20 | 27−30 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro SSG in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 40% more, than Quadro P3200. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 130−140 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 55−60 | 65−70 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro SSG in World of Tanks is 34% more, than Quadro P3200. |
Full Specs
Quadro P3200 | Radeon Pro SSG | |
Architecture | Pascal | GCN 5.0 |
Code name | N18E-Q1 | Vega 10 |
Type | Mobile workstation | Workstation |
Release date | 27 February 2017 | 8 August 2017 |
Pipelines | 1792 | 4096 |
Core clock speed | 708 - 1202 MHz | 1440 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1228 MHz | 1500 MHz |
Transistor count | 12,500 million | |
Manufacturing process technology | 16 nm | 14 nm |
Texture fill rate | 384.0 | |
Floating-point performance | 12,288 gflops | |
Length | 267 mm | |
Memory bus width | 192 Bit | 2048 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 7008 MHz | 1890 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 483.8 GB/s | |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | DirectX 12_1, Shader 5.0 | 12 (12_1) |
Shader Model | 6.4 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | |
OpenCL | 2.0 | |
Vulkan | 1.1.125 | |
Laptop size | large | |
Optimus | + | |
Check Price |