Radeon Pro SSG vs Radeon R9 M395
In this comparison between Radeon Pro SSG and Radeon R9 M395 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people Radeon Pro SSG will be the best choice, for others Radeon R9 M395 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
Radeon Pro SSG
Radeon R9 M395 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon R9 M395 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon R9 M395 here:
Main Specs
Radeon Pro SSG | Radeon R9 M395 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 350 Watt | |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin | |
Memory type | HBM2 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 16 GB | 4 GB |
Display Connectors | 6x mini-DisplayPort | |
Check Price |
- Radeon Pro SSG has 12 GB more memory, than Radeon R9 M395.
- Radeon Pro SSG is used in Desktops, and Radeon R9 M395 - in Laptops.
- Radeon Pro SSG is build with GCN 5.0 architecture, and Radeon R9 M395 - with GCN.
- Core clock speed of Radeon Pro SSG is 606 MHz higher, than Radeon R9 M395.
- Radeon Pro SSG is manufactured by 14 nm process technology, and Radeon R9 M395 - by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Radeon Pro SSG is 640 MHz higher, than Radeon R9 M395.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 50−55 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | 16−18 |
4K / 2160p | 16−18 | 10−11 |
low / 720p | 80−85 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 60−65 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro SSG in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 43% more, than Radeon R9 M395. | ||
high / 1080p | 80−85 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 75−80 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 55−60 | 35−40 |
4K / 2160p | 30−35 | 18−20 |
low / 720p | 140−150 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 95−100 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro SSG in Battlefield 5 is 51% more, than Radeon R9 M395. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M395 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Radeon Pro SSG. | ||
low / 768p | 250−260 | 250−260 |
medium / 768p | 230−240 | 220−230 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 180−190 |
QHD / 1440p | 150−160 | 110−120 |
4K / 2160p | 100−110 | 70−75 |
high / 768p | 220−230 | 210−220 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro SSG in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 10% more, than Radeon R9 M395. | ||
low / 768p | 70−75 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 50−55 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro SSG in Cyberpunk 2077 is 3% more, than Radeon R9 M395. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 120−130 |
medium / 768p | 110−120 | 110−120 |
ultra / 1080p | 110−120 | 100−110 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro SSG in Dota 2 is 2% more, than Radeon R9 M395. | ||
high / 1080p | 65−70 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 65−70 | 40−45 |
QHD / 1440p | 45−50 | 27−30 |
4K / 2160p | 24−27 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 80−85 |
medium / 1080p | 70−75 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro SSG in Far Cry 5 is 48% more, than Radeon R9 M395. | ||
high / 1080p | 100−105 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 75−80 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 50−55 | 27−30 |
4K / 2160p | 21−24 | 27−30 |
low / 720p | 220−230 | 180−190 |
medium / 1080p | 150−160 | 110−120 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro SSG in Fortnite is 36% more, than Radeon R9 M395. | ||
high / 1080p | 90−95 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 70−75 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 50−55 | 30−35 |
4K / 2160p | 35−40 | 24−27 |
low / 720p | 140−150 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 95−100 | 65−70 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro SSG in Forza Horizon 4 is 46% more, than Radeon R9 M395. | ||
low / 768p | 160−170 | 140−150 |
medium / 768p | 150−160 | 120−130 |
high / 1080p | 100−110 | 70−75 |
ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 30−35 |
QHD / 1440p | 45−50 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro SSG in Grand Theft Auto V is 32% more, than Radeon R9 M395. | ||
high / 1080p | 40−45 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 20−22 |
QHD / 1440p | 24−27 | 16−18 |
4K / 2160p | 16−18 | 8−9 |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro SSG in Metro Exodus is 64% more, than Radeon R9 M395. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 130−140 |
medium / 1080p | − | 120−130 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M395 in Minecraft is 8% more, than Radeon Pro SSG. | ||
high / 1080p | 85−90 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 60−65 | 14−16 |
4K / 2160p | 18−20 | − |
low / 720p | 130−140 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 95−100 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro SSG in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 113% more, than Radeon R9 M395. | ||
high / 1080p | 40−45 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 16−18 |
QHD / 1440p | 18−20 | 10−11 |
4K / 2160p | 12−14 | 7−8 |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | 60−65 | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro SSG in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 62% more, than Radeon R9 M395. | ||
low / 768p | 200−210 | 130−140 |
medium / 768p | 130−140 | 85−90 |
high / 1080p | 75−80 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 24−27 |
4K / 2160p | 27−30 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro SSG in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 56% more, than Radeon R9 M395. | ||
low / 768p | 130−140 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | − | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 65−70 | 50−55 |
high / 768p | − | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro SSG in World of Tanks is 40% more, than Radeon R9 M395. |
Full Specs
Radeon Pro SSG | Radeon R9 M395 | |
Architecture | GCN 5.0 | GCN |
Code name | Vega 10 | |
Type | Workstation | Laptop |
Release date | 8 August 2017 | 9 June 2015 |
Pipelines | 4096 | 1792 |
Core clock speed | 1440 MHz | 834 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1500 MHz | |
Transistor count | 12,500 million | 5000 Million |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 384.0 | |
Floating-point performance | 12,288 gflops | |
Length | 267 mm | |
Memory bus width | 2048 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1890 MHz | 1250 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 483.8 GB/s | |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 (12_1) | |
Shader Model | 6.4 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.4 |
OpenCL | 2.0 | Not Listed |
Vulkan | 1.1.125 | + |
FreeSync | + | |
Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 336 Mh/s | |
Laptop size | large | |
Eyefinity | + | |
HD3D | + | |
PowerTune | + | |
DualGraphics | + | |
TrueAudio | + | |
ZeroCore | + | |
Switchable graphics | + | |
Mantle | + | |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- Radeon Pro SSG vs GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER
- Radeon Pro SSG vs Radeon Instinct MI25 MxGPU
- Radeon R9 M395 vs GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER
- Radeon R9 M395 vs Radeon Instinct MI25 MxGPU
- Radeon Pro SSG vs Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
- Radeon Pro SSG vs Radeon Sky 500
- Radeon R9 M395 vs Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
- Radeon R9 M395 vs Radeon Sky 500