Radeon Pro SSG vs Tesla C2050
If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between Radeon Pro SSG and Tesla C2050, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the Radeon Pro SSG stacks up against Tesla C2050, check out specs charts below.
Radeon Pro SSG
![](/static/img/graphics-card.jpg)
Tesla C2050
![](/static/img/graphics-card.jpg)
Main Specs
Radeon Pro SSG | Tesla C2050 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 350 Watt | 238 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin |
Memory type | HBM2 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 16 GB | 3 GB |
Display Connectors | 6x mini-DisplayPort | 1x DVI |
- Radeon Pro SSG has 47% more power consumption, than Tesla C2050.
- Radeon Pro SSG is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Tesla C2050 uses PCIe 2.0 x16 interface.
- Radeon Pro SSG has 13 GB more memory, than Tesla C2050.
- Both cards are used in Desktops.
- Radeon Pro SSG is build with GCN 5.0 architecture, and Tesla C2050 - with Fermi.
- Core clock speed of Radeon Pro SSG is 866 MHz higher, than Tesla C2050.
- Radeon Pro SSG is manufactured by 14 nm process technology, and Tesla C2050 - by 40 nm process technology.
- Radeon Pro SSG is 19 mm longer, than Tesla C2050.
- Memory clock speed of Tesla C2050 is 1110 MHz higher, than Radeon Pro SSG.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 50−55 | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 10−11 |
QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | 4−5 |
4K / 2160p | 16−18 | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 80−85 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 60−65 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro SSG in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 187% more, than Tesla C2050. | ||
high / 1080p | 80−85 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 75−80 | 24−27 |
QHD / 1440p | 55−60 | 8−9 |
4K / 2160p | 30−35 | 6−7 |
low / 720p | 140−150 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 95−100 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro SSG in Battlefield 5 is 203% more, than Tesla C2050. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | − | 50−55 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Radeon Pro SSG. | ||
low / 768p | 250−260 | 220−230 |
medium / 768p | 230−240 | 190−200 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 110−120 |
QHD / 1440p | 150−160 | 70−75 |
4K / 2160p | 100−110 | 35−40 |
high / 768p | 220−230 | 150−160 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro SSG in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 42% more, than Tesla C2050. | ||
low / 768p | 70−75 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 50−55 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro SSG in Cyberpunk 2077 is 3% more, than Tesla C2050. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 110−120 |
medium / 768p | 110−120 | 100−110 |
ultra / 1080p | 110−120 | 70−75 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro SSG in Dota 2 is 21% more, than Tesla C2050. | ||
high / 1080p | 65−70 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 65−70 | 20−22 |
QHD / 1440p | 45−50 | 18−20 |
4K / 2160p | 24−27 | 7−8 |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 70−75 | 24−27 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro SSG in Far Cry 5 is 178% more, than Tesla C2050. | ||
high / 1080p | 100−105 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 75−80 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 50−55 | 14−16 |
4K / 2160p | 21−24 | − |
low / 720p | 220−230 | 110−120 |
medium / 1080p | 150−160 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro SSG in Fortnite is 154% more, than Tesla C2050. | ||
high / 1080p | 90−95 | 30−35 |
ultra / 1080p | 70−75 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 50−55 | 10−12 |
4K / 2160p | 35−40 | − |
low / 720p | 140−150 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 95−100 | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro SSG in Forza Horizon 4 is 178% more, than Tesla C2050. | ||
low / 768p | 160−170 | 95−100 |
medium / 768p | 150−160 | 85−90 |
high / 1080p | 100−110 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 14−16 |
QHD / 1440p | 45−50 | 5−6 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro SSG in Grand Theft Auto V is 118% more, than Tesla C2050. | ||
high / 1080p | 40−45 | 10−12 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 9−10 |
QHD / 1440p | 24−27 | − |
4K / 2160p | 16−18 | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro SSG in Metro Exodus is 233% more, than Tesla C2050. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 110−120 |
medium / 1080p | − | 110−120 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro SSG in Minecraft is 8% more, than Tesla C2050. | ||
high / 1080p | 85−90 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 60−65 | 14−16 |
4K / 2160p | 18−20 | − |
low / 720p | 130−140 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | 95−100 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro SSG in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 196% more, than Tesla C2050. | ||
high / 1080p | 40−45 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 9−10 |
QHD / 1440p | 18−20 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 12−14 | − |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 60−65 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro SSG in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 190% more, than Tesla C2050. | ||
low / 768p | 200−210 | 65−70 |
medium / 768p | 130−140 | 40−45 |
high / 1080p | 75−80 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 12−14 |
4K / 2160p | 27−30 | 7−8 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro SSG in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 223% more, than Tesla C2050. | ||
low / 768p | 130−140 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | − | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 65−70 | 35−40 |
high / 768p | − | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro SSG in World of Tanks is 55% more, than Tesla C2050. |
Full Specs
Radeon Pro SSG | Tesla C2050 | |
Architecture | GCN 5.0 | Fermi |
Code name | Vega 10 | GF100 |
Type | Workstation | Workstation |
Release date | 8 August 2017 | 25 July 2011 |
Pipelines | 4096 | 448 |
Core clock speed | 1440 MHz | 574 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1500 MHz | |
Transistor count | 12,500 million | 3,100 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 40 nm |
Texture fill rate | 384.0 | 32.14 |
Floating-point performance | 12,288 gflops | 1,030.4 gflops |
Length | 267 mm | 248 mm |
Memory bus width | 2048 Bit | 384 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1890 MHz | 3000 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 483.8 GB/s | 144.0 GB/s |
DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 12 (11_0) |
Shader Model | 6.4 | 5.1 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 2.0 | 1.1 |
Vulkan | 1.1.125 | N/A |
CUDA | 2.0 | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 90 Mh/s | |