Radeon Pro SSG vs Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7
When choosing between Radeon Pro SSG and Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between Radeon Pro SSG and Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7.
Radeon Pro SSG
Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 here:
Main Specs
Radeon Pro SSG | Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 350 Watt | |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin | |
Memory type | HBM2 | DDR4 |
Maximum RAM amount | 16 GB | |
Display Connectors | 6x mini-DisplayPort | |
Check Price |
- Radeon Pro SSG is used in Desktops, and Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 - in Laptops.
- Radeon Pro SSG is build with GCN 5.0 architecture, and Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 - with Gen. 11 Ice Lake.
- Radeon Pro SSG is manufactured by 14 nm process technology, and Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 - by 10 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 50−55 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | 1−2 |
4K / 2160p | 16−18 | − |
low / 720p | 80−85 | 30−33 |
medium / 1080p | 60−65 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro SSG in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 271% more, than Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7. | ||
high / 1080p | 80−85 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 75−80 | 18−20 |
QHD / 1440p | 55−60 | 1−2 |
4K / 2160p | 30−35 | − |
low / 720p | 140−150 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 95−100 | 24−27 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro SSG in Battlefield 5 is 300% more, than Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Radeon Pro SSG. | ||
low / 768p | 250−260 | 200−210 |
medium / 768p | 230−240 | 170−180 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 90−95 |
QHD / 1440p | 150−160 | 50−55 |
4K / 2160p | 100−110 | 24−27 |
high / 768p | 220−230 | 130−140 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro SSG in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 65% more, than Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7. | ||
low / 768p | 70−75 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 50−55 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro SSG in Cyberpunk 2077 is 3% more, than Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 110−120 |
medium / 768p | 110−120 | 90−95 |
ultra / 1080p | 110−120 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro SSG in Dota 2 is 31% more, than Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7. | ||
high / 1080p | 65−70 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 65−70 | 14−16 |
QHD / 1440p | 45−50 | − |
4K / 2160p | 24−27 | 5−6 |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 70−75 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro SSG in Far Cry 5 is 272% more, than Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7. | ||
high / 1080p | 100−105 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 75−80 | 18−20 |
QHD / 1440p | 50−55 | 12−14 |
4K / 2160p | 21−24 | − |
low / 720p | 220−230 | 95−100 |
medium / 1080p | 150−160 | 50−55 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro SSG in Fortnite is 205% more, than Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7. | ||
high / 1080p | 90−95 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 70−75 | 18−20 |
QHD / 1440p | 50−55 | 6−7 |
4K / 2160p | 35−40 | − |
low / 720p | 140−150 | 50−55 |
medium / 1080p | 95−100 | 27−30 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro SSG in Forza Horizon 4 is 253% more, than Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7. | ||
low / 768p | 160−170 | 80−85 |
medium / 768p | 150−160 | 70−75 |
high / 1080p | 100−110 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 10−12 |
QHD / 1440p | 45−50 | 1−2 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro SSG in Grand Theft Auto V is 169% more, than Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7. | ||
high / 1080p | 40−45 | 8−9 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 6−7 |
QHD / 1440p | 24−27 | − |
4K / 2160p | 16−18 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro SSG in Metro Exodus is 321% more, than Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 110−120 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | − | 100−110 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro SSG in Minecraft is 8% more, than Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7. | ||
high / 1080p | 85−90 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 60−65 | 14−16 |
4K / 2160p | 18−20 | − |
low / 720p | 130−140 | 55−60 |
medium / 1080p | 95−100 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro SSG in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 226% more, than Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7. | ||
high / 1080p | 40−45 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | 18−20 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 12−14 | − |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | 60−65 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro SSG in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 262% more, than Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7. | ||
low / 768p | 200−210 | 50−55 |
medium / 768p | 130−140 | 30−35 |
high / 1080p | 75−80 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 10−11 |
4K / 2160p | 27−30 | 5−6 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro SSG in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 321% more, than Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7. | ||
low / 768p | 130−140 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | − | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 65−70 | 30−35 |
high / 768p | − | 50−55 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro SSG in World of Tanks is 62% more, than Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7. |
Full Specs
Radeon Pro SSG | Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 | |
Architecture | GCN 5.0 | Gen. 11 Ice Lake |
Code name | Vega 10 | Tiger Lake Xe |
Type | Workstation | Laptop |
Release date | 8 August 2017 | 15 August 2020 |
Pipelines | 4096 | 96 |
Core clock speed | 1440 MHz | |
Boost Clock | 1500 MHz | |
Transistor count | 12,500 million | |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 10 nm |
Texture fill rate | 384.0 | |
Floating-point performance | 12,288 gflops | |
Length | 267 mm | |
Memory bus width | 2048 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 1890 MHz | |
Memory bandwidth | 483.8 GB/s | |
Shared memory | + | |
DirectX | 12 (12_1) | DirectX 12_1 |
Shader Model | 6.4 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | |
OpenCL | 2.0 | |
Vulkan | 1.1.125 | |
Quick Sync | + | |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- Radeon Pro SSG vs GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER
- Radeon Pro SSG vs Radeon Instinct MI25 MxGPU
- Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 vs GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER
- Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 vs Radeon Instinct MI25 MxGPU
- Radeon Pro SSG vs GeForce GTX 950
- Radeon Pro SSG vs Radeon Pro WX 5100
- Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 vs GeForce GTX 950
- Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 vs Radeon Pro WX 5100