GeForce 820A vs Radeon Pro V340 MxGPU
When choosing between GeForce 820A and Radeon Pro V340 MxGPU, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between GeForce 820A and Radeon Pro V340 MxGPU.
GeForce 820A
Radeon Pro V340 MxGPU
Main Specs
GeForce 820A | Radeon Pro V340 MxGPU | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 15 Watt | 300 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | 2x 8-pin | |
Memory type | DDR3 | HBM2 |
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 16 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
- Radeon Pro V340 MxGPU has 1900% more power consumption, than GeForce 820A.
- GeForce 820A is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and Radeon Pro V340 MxGPU uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
- Radeon Pro V340 MxGPU has 15 GB more memory, than GeForce 820A.
- Both cards are used in Desktops.
- GeForce 820A is build with Fermi 2.0 architecture, and Radeon Pro V340 MxGPU - with GCN 5.0.
- Core clock speed of Radeon Pro V340 MxGPU is 225 MHz higher, than GeForce 820A.
- GeForce 820A is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Radeon Pro V340 MxGPU - by 14 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Radeon Pro V340 MxGPU is 200 MHz higher, than GeForce 820A.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 0−1 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 8−9 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 3−4 |
low / 720p | 1−2 | 30−33 |
medium / 1080p | 0−1 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro V340 MxGPU in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 3000% more, than GeForce 820A. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 20−22 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 6−7 |
4K / 2160p | − | 5−6 |
low / 720p | 0−1 | 50−55 |
medium / 1080p | − | 24−27 |
low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce 820A in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Radeon Pro V340 MxGPU. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 200−210 |
medium / 768p | 27−30 | 170−180 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 95−100 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 50−55 |
4K / 2160p | − | 30−33 |
high / 768p | 16−18 | 130−140 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro V340 MxGPU in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 446% more, than GeForce 820A. | ||
low / 768p | 70−75 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce 820A in Cyberpunk 2077 is 15% more, than Radeon Pro V340 MxGPU. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 100−110 |
medium / 768p | 10−11 | 90−95 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro V340 MxGPU in Dota 2 is 237% more, than GeForce 820A. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 16−18 |
4K / 2160p | − | 6−7 |
low / 720p | 0−1 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | − | 18−20 |
high / 1080p | − | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 18−20 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 16−18 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 95−100 |
medium / 1080p | 0−1 | 50−55 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro V340 MxGPU in Fortnite is 340% more, than GeForce 820A. | ||
high / 1080p | 0−1 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 18−20 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 8−9 |
low / 720p | 0−1 | 50−55 |
medium / 1080p | 0−1 | 27−30 |
low / 768p | 18−20 | 80−85 |
medium / 768p | − | 75−80 |
high / 1080p | 0−1 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
medium / 720p | 12−14 | − |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro V340 MxGPU in Grand Theft Auto V is 331% more, than GeForce 820A. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 9−10 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 7−8 |
4K / 2160p | − | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 0−1 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
low / 768p | 75−80 | 110−120 |
high / 1080p | 27−30 | − |
ultra / 1080p | − | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | − | 100−110 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro V340 MxGPU in Minecraft is 49% more, than GeForce 820A. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 16−18 |
low / 720p | 8−9 | 55−60 |
medium / 1080p | − | 24−27 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro V340 MxGPU in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 612% more, than GeForce 820A. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 9−10 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 0−1 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | − | 16−18 |
low / 768p | 0−1 | 50−55 |
medium / 768p | − | 30−35 |
high / 1080p | − | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 10−12 |
4K / 2160p | − | 8−9 |
low / 768p | 45−50 | 100−110 |
medium / 768p | 14−16 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 30−35 |
high / 768p | 12−14 | 50−55 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro V340 MxGPU in World of Tanks is 192% more, than GeForce 820A. |
Full Specs
GeForce 820A | Radeon Pro V340 MxGPU | |
Architecture | Fermi 2.0 | GCN 5.0 |
Code name | GF117 | Vega 10 |
Type | Desktop | Workstation |
Release date | 17 March 2014 | 26 August 2018 |
Pipelines | 96 | 3584 |
Core clock speed | 775 MHz | 1000 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1500 MHz | |
Transistor count | 585 million | 12,500 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 14 nm |
Texture fill rate | 12.40 | 336.0 |
Floating-point performance | 297.6 gflops | |
Length | 267 mm | |
Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 2048 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz | 2000 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 14.4 GB/s | 512.0 GB/s |
DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 (12_1) |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 6.4 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.1 | 2.0 |
Vulkan | N/A | 1.1.125 |
CUDA | 2.1 | |