GeForce GTX 295 vs Radeon Pro V340 MxGPU
When choosing between GeForce GTX 295 and Radeon Pro V340 MxGPU, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between GeForce GTX 295 and Radeon Pro V340 MxGPU.
GeForce GTX 295
Radeon Pro V340 MxGPU
Main Specs
| GeForce GTX 295 | Radeon Pro V340 MxGPU | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 289 Watt | 300 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | 6-pin & 8-pin | 2x 8-pin |
| Memory type | GDDR3 | HBM2 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 1792 MB | 16 GB |
| Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI | No outputs |
- Radeon Pro V340 MxGPU has 3% more power consumption, than GeForce GTX 295.
- GeForce GTX 295 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and Radeon Pro V340 MxGPU uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
- GeForce GTX 295 has 1776 GB more memory, than Radeon Pro V340 MxGPU.
- Both cards are used in Desktops.
- GeForce GTX 295 is build with Tesla 2.0 architecture, and Radeon Pro V340 MxGPU - with GCN 5.0.
- Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 295 is 242 MHz higher, than Radeon Pro V340 MxGPU.
- GeForce GTX 295 is manufactured by 55 nm process technology, and Radeon Pro V340 MxGPU - by 14 nm process technology.
- Radeon Pro V340 MxGPU is 257 mm longer, than GeForce GTX 295.
- Memory clock speed of Radeon Pro V340 MxGPU is 1001 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 295.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 3−4 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 8−9 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 3−4 |
| low / 720p | 14−16 | 30−33 |
| medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro V340 MxGPU in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 200% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 20−22 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 6−7 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 5−6 |
| low / 720p | 18−20 | 50−55 |
| medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 24−27 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro V340 MxGPU in Battlefield 5 is 200% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | 30−35 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| GeForce GTX 295 and Radeon Pro V340 MxGPU have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 200−210 |
| medium / 768p | 90−95 | 170−180 |
| ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 95−100 |
| QHD / 1440p | 24−27 | 50−55 |
| 4K / 2160p | 18−20 | 30−33 |
| high / 768p | 65−70 | 130−140 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro V340 MxGPU in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 87% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
| low / 768p | 80−85 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro V340 MxGPU in Cyberpunk 2077 is 2% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 100−110 |
| medium / 768p | 50−55 | 90−95 |
| ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 60−65 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro V340 MxGPU in Dota 2 is 65% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
| high / 1080p | 5−6 | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 16−18 |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 6−7 |
| low / 720p | 14−16 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 6−7 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro V340 MxGPU in Far Cry 5 is 185% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 24−27 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 18−20 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 16−18 |
| low / 720p | 50−55 | 95−100 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 50−55 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro V340 MxGPU in Fortnite is 118% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
| high / 1080p | 7−8 | 24−27 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 18−20 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 8−9 |
| low / 720p | 20−22 | 50−55 |
| medium / 1080p | 9−10 | 27−30 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro V340 MxGPU in Forza Horizon 4 is 191% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 80−85 |
| medium / 768p | − | 75−80 |
| high / 1080p | 8−9 | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 12−14 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
| medium / 720p | 40−45 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro V340 MxGPU in Grand Theft Auto V is 105% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
| high / 1080p | 3−4 | 9−10 |
| ultra / 1080p | 1−2 | 7−8 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 8−9 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 4−5 | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro V340 MxGPU in Metro Exodus is 250% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 110−120 |
| high / 1080p | 85−90 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | 100−110 |
| medium / 1080p | 85−90 | 100−110 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro V340 MxGPU in Minecraft is 27% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 16−18 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 55−60 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 24−27 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro V340 MxGPU in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 83% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 9−10 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 8−9 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro V340 MxGPU in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 137% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
| low / 768p | 16−18 | 50−55 |
| medium / 768p | 12−14 | 30−35 |
| high / 1080p | 6−7 | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 10−12 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 8−9 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro V340 MxGPU in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 180% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 100−110 |
| medium / 768p | 35−40 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 30−35 |
| high / 768p | 30−35 | 50−55 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro V340 MxGPU in World of Tanks is 61% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
Full Specs
| GeForce GTX 295 | Radeon Pro V340 MxGPU | |
| Architecture | Tesla 2.0 | GCN 5.0 |
| Code name | GT200B | Vega 10 |
| Type | Desktop | Workstation |
| Release date | 8 January 2009 | 26 August 2018 |
| Pipelines | 240 | 3584 |
| Core clock speed | 1242 MHz | 1000 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 1500 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 1,400 million | 12,500 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 55 nm | 14 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 92.2 billion/sec | 336.0 |
| Floating-point performance | 2x 596.2 gflops | |
| Length | 10.5" (267 mm) (26.7 cm) | 267 mm |
| Memory bus width | 896 Bit | 2048 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 999 MHz | 2000 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 223.8 GB/s | 512.0 GB/s |
| DirectX | 11.1 (10_0) | 12 (12_1) |
| Shader Model | 4.0 | 6.4 |
| OpenGL | 2.1 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | 2.0 |
| Vulkan | N/A | 1.1.125 |
| CUDA | + | |
| CUDA cores | 480 | |
| Height | 4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm) | |
| SLI options | + | |
| Multi monitor support | + | |
| HDMI | + | |
| Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
| Audio input for HDMI | S/PDIF | |
| CUDA cores per GPU | 240 | |
| Standard memory config per GPU | 896 MB | |
| Memory interface width per GPU | 448 Bit | |
| High Dynamic-Range Lighting (HDRR) | 128bit | |