GeForce GTX 460 SE vs Radeon Pro V340 MxGPU
When comparing GeForce GTX 460 SE and Radeon Pro V340 MxGPU, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between GeForce GTX 460 SE and Radeon Pro V340 MxGPU is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
GeForce GTX 460 SE
Radeon Pro V340 MxGPU
Main Specs
GeForce GTX 460 SE | Radeon Pro V340 MxGPU | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 150 Watt | 300 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | 6-pin & 6-pin | 2x 8-pin |
Memory type | GDDR5 | HBM2 |
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 16 GB |
Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI | No outputs |
- Radeon Pro V340 MxGPU has 100% more power consumption, than GeForce GTX 460 SE.
- GeForce GTX 460 SE is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and Radeon Pro V340 MxGPU uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
- Radeon Pro V340 MxGPU has 15 GB more memory, than GeForce GTX 460 SE.
- Both cards are used in Desktops.
- GeForce GTX 460 SE is build with Fermi architecture, and Radeon Pro V340 MxGPU - with GCN 5.0.
- Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 460 SE is 300 MHz higher, than Radeon Pro V340 MxGPU.
- GeForce GTX 460 SE is manufactured by 40 nm process technology, and Radeon Pro V340 MxGPU - by 14 nm process technology.
- Radeon Pro V340 MxGPU is 259 mm longer, than GeForce GTX 460 SE.
- Memory clock speed of Radeon Pro V340 MxGPU is 300 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 460 SE.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 9−10 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 8−9 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 3−4 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 30−33 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro V340 MxGPU in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 50% more, than GeForce GTX 460 SE. | ||
high / 1080p | 16−18 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 20−22 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 6−7 |
4K / 2160p | − | 5−6 |
low / 720p | 30−35 | 50−55 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 24−27 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro V340 MxGPU in Battlefield 5 is 57% more, than GeForce GTX 460 SE. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
GeForce GTX 460 SE and Radeon Pro V340 MxGPU have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 160−170 | 200−210 |
medium / 768p | 130−140 | 170−180 |
ultra / 1080p | 65−70 | 95−100 |
QHD / 1440p | 40−45 | 50−55 |
4K / 2160p | 27−30 | 30−33 |
high / 768p | 100−110 | 130−140 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro V340 MxGPU in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 28% more, than GeForce GTX 460 SE. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro V340 MxGPU in Cyberpunk 2077 is 9% more, than GeForce GTX 460 SE. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 100−110 |
medium / 768p | 70−75 | 90−95 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro V340 MxGPU in Dota 2 is 22% more, than GeForce GTX 460 SE. | ||
high / 1080p | 10−12 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 16−18 |
4K / 2160p | 4−5 | 6−7 |
low / 720p | 24−27 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro V340 MxGPU in Far Cry 5 is 58% more, than GeForce GTX 460 SE. | ||
high / 1080p | 18−20 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 18−20 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 16−18 |
low / 720p | 70−75 | 95−100 |
medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 50−55 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro V340 MxGPU in Fortnite is 41% more, than GeForce GTX 460 SE. | ||
high / 1080p | 16−18 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 8−9 |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 50−55 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 27−30 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro V340 MxGPU in Forza Horizon 4 is 44% more, than GeForce GTX 460 SE. | ||
low / 768p | 65−70 | 80−85 |
medium / 768p | 55−60 | 75−80 |
high / 1080p | 18−20 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro V340 MxGPU in Grand Theft Auto V is 31% more, than GeForce GTX 460 SE. | ||
high / 1080p | 6−7 | 9−10 |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 7−8 |
4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 18−20 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro V340 MxGPU in Metro Exodus is 50% more, than GeForce GTX 460 SE. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 110−120 |
ultra / 1080p | 90−95 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 95−100 | 100−110 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro V340 MxGPU in Minecraft is 10% more, than GeForce GTX 460 SE. | ||
high / 1080p | 18−20 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 16−18 |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 55−60 |
medium / 1080p | 20−22 | 24−27 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro V340 MxGPU in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 25% more, than GeForce GTX 460 SE. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 9−10 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 18−20 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro V340 MxGPU in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 30% more, than GeForce GTX 460 SE. | ||
low / 768p | 35−40 | 50−55 |
medium / 768p | 21−24 | 30−35 |
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 10−12 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro V340 MxGPU in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 41% more, than GeForce GTX 460 SE. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 100−110 |
medium / 768p | 50−55 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 30−35 |
high / 768p | 40−45 | 50−55 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro V340 MxGPU in World of Tanks is 18% more, than GeForce GTX 460 SE. |
Full Specs
GeForce GTX 460 SE | Radeon Pro V340 MxGPU | |
Architecture | Fermi | GCN 5.0 |
Code name | GF104 | Vega 10 |
Type | Desktop | Workstation |
Release date | 15 November 2010 | 26 August 2018 |
Pipelines | 288 | 3584 |
Core clock speed | 1300 MHz | 1000 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1500 MHz | |
Transistor count | 1,950 million | 12,500 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 14 nm |
Texture fill rate | 31.2 billion/sec | 336.0 |
Floating-point performance | 748.8 gflops | |
Length | 8.25" (210 mm) (21 cm) | 267 mm |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 2048 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1700 MHz | 2000 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 108.8 GB/s | 512.0 GB/s |
DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 (12_1) |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 6.4 |
OpenGL | 4.1 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.1 | 2.0 |
Vulkan | N/A | 1.1.125 |
CUDA | + | |
CUDA cores | 288 | |
Bus support | 16x PCI-E 2.0 | |
Height | 4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm) | |
SLI options | + | |
Multi monitor support | + | |
HDMI | + | |
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
Audio input for HDMI | Internal | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 48 Mh/s | |
Number of display connectors | 2 | |
Similar compares
- GeForce GTX 460 SE vs GeForce GTX 470M
- GeForce GTX 460 SE vs Quadro M600M
- Radeon Pro V340 MxGPU vs GeForce GTX 470M
- Radeon Pro V340 MxGPU vs Quadro M600M
- GeForce GTX 460 SE vs Quadro M620
- GeForce GTX 460 SE vs GeForce GTX 465
- Radeon Pro V340 MxGPU vs Quadro M620
- Radeon Pro V340 MxGPU vs GeForce GTX 465