Quadro FX 3800 vs Radeon Pro V340 MxGPU
In this comparison between Quadro FX 3800 and Radeon Pro V340 MxGPU you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people Quadro FX 3800 will be the best choice, for others Radeon Pro V340 MxGPU will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
Quadro FX 3800
Radeon Pro V340 MxGPU
Main Specs
| Quadro FX 3800 | Radeon Pro V340 MxGPU | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 108 Watt | 300 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | 2x 8-pin |
| Memory type | GDDR3 | HBM2 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 16 GB |
| Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort | No outputs |
- Radeon Pro V340 MxGPU has 177% more power consumption, than Quadro FX 3800.
- Quadro FX 3800 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and Radeon Pro V340 MxGPU uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
- Radeon Pro V340 MxGPU has 15 GB more memory, than Quadro FX 3800.
- Both cards are used in Desktops.
- Quadro FX 3800 is build with Tesla 2.0 architecture, and Radeon Pro V340 MxGPU - with GCN 5.0.
- Core clock speed of Radeon Pro V340 MxGPU is 400 MHz higher, than Quadro FX 3800.
- Quadro FX 3800 is manufactured by 55 nm process technology, and Radeon Pro V340 MxGPU - by 14 nm process technology.
- Radeon Pro V340 MxGPU is 69 mm longer, than Quadro FX 3800.
- Memory clock speed of Radeon Pro V340 MxGPU is 400 MHz higher, than Quadro FX 3800.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 0−1 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 8−9 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 3−4 |
| low / 720p | 10−11 | 30−33 |
| medium / 1080p | 1−2 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro V340 MxGPU in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 316% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 20−22 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 6−7 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 5−6 |
| low / 720p | 9−10 | 50−55 |
| medium / 1080p | 2−3 | 24−27 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro V340 MxGPU in Battlefield 5 is 725% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro FX 3800 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Radeon Pro V340 MxGPU. | ||
| low / 768p | 100−110 | 200−210 |
| medium / 768p | 75−80 | 170−180 |
| ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 95−100 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 50−55 |
| 4K / 2160p | 9−10 | 30−33 |
| high / 768p | 50−55 | 130−140 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro V340 MxGPU in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 132% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro V340 MxGPU in Cyberpunk 2077 is 6% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
| low / 768p | 65−70 | 100−110 |
| medium / 768p | 40−45 | 90−95 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 60−65 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro V340 MxGPU in Dota 2 is 109% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
| high / 1080p | 1−2 | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 16−18 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 6−7 |
| low / 720p | 7−8 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 2−3 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro V340 MxGPU in Far Cry 5 is 700% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 24−27 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 18−20 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 16−18 |
| low / 720p | 40−45 | 95−100 |
| medium / 1080p | 4−5 | 50−55 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro V340 MxGPU in Fortnite is 226% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
| high / 1080p | 1−2 | 24−27 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 18−20 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 8−9 |
| low / 720p | 12−14 | 50−55 |
| medium / 1080p | 4−5 | 27−30 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro V340 MxGPU in Forza Horizon 4 is 483% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
| low / 768p | 35−40 | 80−85 |
| medium / 768p | − | 75−80 |
| high / 1080p | 1−2 | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
| medium / 720p | 30−35 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro V340 MxGPU in Grand Theft Auto V is 189% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
| high / 1080p | 0−1 | 9−10 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 7−8 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 1−2 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro V340 MxGPU in Metro Exodus is 2700% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 110−120 |
| high / 1080p | 50−55 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 100−110 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 100−110 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro V340 MxGPU in Minecraft is 32% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 16−18 |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 55−60 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 24−27 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro V340 MxGPU in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 87% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 9−10 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 2−3 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro V340 MxGPU in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 1300% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
| low / 768p | 4−5 | 50−55 |
| medium / 768p | − | 30−35 |
| high / 1080p | 2−3 | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 10−12 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 8−9 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro V340 MxGPU in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 1066% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
| low / 768p | 65−70 | 100−110 |
| medium / 768p | 30−35 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 30−35 |
| high / 768p | 27−30 | 50−55 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro V340 MxGPU in World of Tanks is 85% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
Full Specs
| Quadro FX 3800 | Radeon Pro V340 MxGPU | |
| Architecture | Tesla 2.0 | GCN 5.0 |
| Code name | GT200B | Vega 10 |
| Type | Workstation | Workstation |
| Release date | 30 March 2009 | 26 August 2018 |
| Pipelines | 192 | 3584 |
| Core clock speed | 600 MHz | 1000 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 1500 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 1,400 million | 12,500 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 55 nm | 14 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 38.40 | 336.0 |
| Floating-point performance | 462.3 gflops | |
| Length | 198 mm | 267 mm |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 2048 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1600 MHz | 2000 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 51.2 GB/s | 512.0 GB/s |
| DirectX | 11.1 (10_0) | 12 (12_1) |
| Shader Model | 4.0 | 6.4 |
| OpenGL | 3.3 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | 2.0 |
| Vulkan | N/A | 1.1.125 |
| CUDA | 1.3 | |