FirePro M4150 vs Radeon Pro Vega 16
Find out if it is worth upgrading your current GPU setup by comparing FirePro M4150 and Radeon Pro Vega 16. Here you can take a closer look at graphics cards specs, such as core clock speed, memory type and size, display connectors, etc. The price, overall benchmark and gaming performances are usually defining factors when it comes to choosing between FirePro M4150 and Radeon Pro Vega 16. Make sure that the graphics card has compatible dimensions and will properly fit in your new or current computer case. Also these graphics cards may have different system power recommendations, so take that into consideration and upgrade your PSU if necessary.
FirePro M4150
Radeon Pro Vega 16 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon Pro Vega 16 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon Pro Vega 16 here:
Main Specs
| FirePro M4150 | Radeon Pro Vega 16 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 75 Watt | |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | HBM2 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 4 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- FirePro M4150 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x8, and Radeon Pro Vega 16 uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
- Radeon Pro Vega 16 has 3 GB more memory, than FirePro M4150.
- FirePro M4150 is used in Desktops, and Radeon Pro Vega 16 - in Mobile workstations.
- FirePro M4150 is build with GCN 1.0 architecture, and Radeon Pro Vega 16 - with Vega.
- FirePro M4150 is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Radeon Pro Vega 16 - by 14 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of FirePro M4150 is 1600 MHz higher, than Radeon Pro Vega 16.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 2−3 | 24−27 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 14−16 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 9−10 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 6−7 |
| low / 720p | 12−14 | 45−50 |
| medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 30−33 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro Vega 16 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 466% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 30−35 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 18−20 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 10−11 |
| low / 720p | 14−16 | 75−80 |
| medium / 1080p | 6−7 | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro Vega 16 in Battlefield 5 is 455% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | 40−45 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| FirePro M4150 and Radeon Pro Vega 16 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 240−250 |
| medium / 768p | 90−95 | 210−220 |
| ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 130−140 |
| QHD / 1440p | 21−24 | 100−110 |
| 4K / 2160p | 16−18 | 60−65 |
| high / 768p | 65−70 | 180−190 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro Vega 16 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 161% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
| low / 768p | 65−70 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | − |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro Vega 16 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 5% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 120−130 |
| medium / 768p | 45−50 | 110−120 |
| ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 85−90 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro Vega 16 in Dota 2 is 127% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
| high / 1080p | 2−3 | 30−33 |
| ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 27−30 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 21−24 |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 9−10 |
| low / 720p | 10−12 | 60−65 |
| medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro Vega 16 in Far Cry 5 is 700% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−11 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 30−33 |
| QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 18−20 |
| low / 720p | 50−55 | 130−140 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 80−85 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro Vega 16 in Fortnite is 281% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
| high / 1080p | 5−6 | 40−45 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 30−35 |
| QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 18−20 |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 16−18 |
| low / 720p | 18−20 | 75−80 |
| medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro Vega 16 in Forza Horizon 4 is 471% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 110−120 |
| medium / 768p | − | 100−110 |
| high / 1080p | 4−5 | 45−50 |
| ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 20−22 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 10−11 |
| medium / 720p | 35−40 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro Vega 16 in Grand Theft Auto V is 238% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
| high / 1080p | 1−2 | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 12−14 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 12−14 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
| low / 720p | 4−5 | 45−50 |
| medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro Vega 16 in Metro Exodus is 866% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 120−130 |
| high / 1080p | 80−85 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 70−75 | − |
| medium / 1080p | 85−90 | 110−120 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro Vega 16 in Minecraft is 33% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 80−85 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro Vega 16 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 111% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 4−5 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 3−4 |
| low / 720p | 6−7 | 45−50 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 24−27 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro Vega 16 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 683% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
| low / 768p | 9−10 | 85−90 |
| medium / 768p | 8−9 | 55−60 |
| high / 1080p | 4−5 | 30−33 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 16−18 |
| 4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 10−11 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro Vega 16 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 700% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 35−40 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 45−50 |
| high / 768p | 30−35 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro Vega 16 in World of Tanks is 66% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
Full Specs
| FirePro M4150 | Radeon Pro Vega 16 | |
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 | Vega |
| Code name | Opal | Vega Mobile |
| Type | Workstation | Mobile workstation |
| Release date | 16 October 2013 | 15 November 2018 |
| Pipelines | 384 | 1024 |
| Core clock speed | 715 MHz | |
| Boost Clock | 1190 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 950 million | |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 14 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 17.16 | 76.16 |
| Floating-point performance | 549.1 gflops | |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 1024 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 4000 MHz | 2400 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 64 GB/s | 307.2 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (11_1) | 12 (12_1) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 6.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 2.0 |
| Vulkan | 1.2.131 | 1.2.131 |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Check Price |