FirePro S9000 vs Radeon Pro Vega 16
When choosing between FirePro S9000 and Radeon Pro Vega 16, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between FirePro S9000 and Radeon Pro Vega 16.
FirePro S9000
Radeon Pro Vega 16 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon Pro Vega 16 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon Pro Vega 16 here:
Main Specs
FirePro S9000 | Radeon Pro Vega 16 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 350 Watt | 75 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | HBM2 |
Maximum RAM amount | 6 GB | 4 GB |
Display Connectors | 1x DisplayPort | No outputs |
Check Price |
- FirePro S9000 has 366% more power consumption, than Radeon Pro Vega 16.
- Both video cards are using PCIe 3.0 x16 interface connection to a motherboard.
- FirePro S9000 has 2 GB more memory, than Radeon Pro Vega 16.
- FirePro S9000 is used in Desktops, and Radeon Pro Vega 16 - in Mobile workstations.
- FirePro S9000 is build with GCN 1.0 architecture, and Radeon Pro Vega 16 - with Vega.
- FirePro S9000 is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Radeon Pro Vega 16 - by 14 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of FirePro S9000 is 3100 MHz higher, than Radeon Pro Vega 16.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 35−40 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 14−16 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 9−10 |
4K / 2160p | 10−11 | 6−7 |
low / 720p | 60−65 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 30−33 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 45% more, than Radeon Pro Vega 16. | ||
high / 1080p | 55−60 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 30−35 |
QHD / 1440p | 35−40 | 18−20 |
4K / 2160p | 18−20 | 10−11 |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 75−80 |
medium / 1080p | 60−65 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Battlefield 5 is 50% more, than Radeon Pro Vega 16. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
FirePro S9000 and Radeon Pro Vega 16 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 250−260 | 240−250 |
medium / 768p | 220−230 | 210−220 |
ultra / 1080p | 180−190 | 130−140 |
QHD / 1440p | 110−120 | 100−110 |
4K / 2160p | 70−75 | 60−65 |
high / 768p | 210−220 | 180−190 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 12% more, than Radeon Pro Vega 16. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
FirePro S9000 and Radeon Pro Vega 16 have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 120−130 |
medium / 768p | 110−120 | 110−120 |
ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | 85−90 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Dota 2 is 5% more, than Radeon Pro Vega 16. | ||
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 30−33 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 27−30 |
QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | 21−24 |
4K / 2160p | 14−16 | 9−10 |
low / 720p | 80−85 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Far Cry 5 is 38% more, than Radeon Pro Vega 16. | ||
high / 1080p | 60−65 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 30−33 |
QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | 18−20 |
4K / 2160p | 27−30 | − |
low / 720p | 180−190 | 130−140 |
medium / 1080p | 110−120 | 80−85 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Fortnite is 42% more, than Radeon Pro Vega 16. | ||
high / 1080p | 60−65 | 40−45 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 30−35 |
QHD / 1440p | 30−35 | 18−20 |
4K / 2160p | 24−27 | 16−18 |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 75−80 |
medium / 1080p | 65−70 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Forza Horizon 4 is 43% more, than Radeon Pro Vega 16. | ||
low / 768p | 140−150 | 110−120 |
medium / 768p | 120−130 | 100−110 |
high / 1080p | 70−75 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 20−22 |
QHD / 1440p | 21−24 | 10−11 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Grand Theft Auto V is 33% more, than Radeon Pro Vega 16. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 12−14 |
4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Metro Exodus is 47% more, than Radeon Pro Vega 16. | ||
low / 768p | 130−140 | 120−130 |
medium / 1080p | 120−130 | 110−120 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Minecraft is 8% more, than Radeon Pro Vega 16. | ||
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 80−85 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 21% more, than Radeon Pro Vega 16. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | 10−11 | 4−5 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 3−4 |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 24−27 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 50% more, than Radeon Pro Vega 16. | ||
low / 768p | 130−140 | 85−90 |
medium / 768p | 85−90 | 55−60 |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 30−33 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 16−18 |
4K / 2160p | 16−18 | 10−11 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 55% more, than Radeon Pro Vega 16. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
high / 768p | 60−65 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in World of Tanks is 3% more, than Radeon Pro Vega 16. |
Full Specs
FirePro S9000 | Radeon Pro Vega 16 | |
Architecture | GCN 1.0 | Vega |
Code name | Tahiti | Vega Mobile |
Type | Workstation | Mobile workstation |
Release date | 24 August 2012 | 15 November 2018 |
Pipelines | 1792 | 1024 |
Core clock speed | 900 MHz | |
Boost Clock | 1190 MHz | |
Transistor count | 4,313 million | |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 14 nm |
Texture fill rate | 100.8 | 76.16 |
Floating-point performance | 3,226 gflops | |
Length | 267 mm | |
Memory bus width | 384 Bit | 1024 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 5500 MHz | 2400 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 264 GB/s | 307.2 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 (11_1) | 12 (12_1) |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 6.3 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 2.0 |
Vulkan | 1.2.131 | 1.2.131 |
Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 92 Mh/s | |
Laptop size | large | |
Form factor | full height / full length | |
DisplayPort count | 1 | |
Dual-link DVI support | + | |
Check Price |