FireStream 9250 vs Radeon Pro Vega 16
Find out if it is worth upgrading your current GPU setup by comparing FireStream 9250 and Radeon Pro Vega 16. Here you can take a closer look at graphics cards specs, such as core clock speed, memory type and size, display connectors, etc. The price, overall benchmark and gaming performances are usually defining factors when it comes to choosing between FireStream 9250 and Radeon Pro Vega 16. Make sure that the graphics card has compatible dimensions and will properly fit in your new or current computer case. Also these graphics cards may have different system power recommendations, so take that into consideration and upgrade your PSU if necessary.
FireStream 9250
Radeon Pro Vega 16 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon Pro Vega 16 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon Pro Vega 16 here:
Main Specs
FireStream 9250 | Radeon Pro Vega 16 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 150 Watt | 75 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | |
Memory type | GDDR3 | HBM2 |
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 4 GB |
Display Connectors | 1x DVI | No outputs |
Check Price |
- FireStream 9250 has 100% more power consumption, than Radeon Pro Vega 16.
- FireStream 9250 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and Radeon Pro Vega 16 uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
- Radeon Pro Vega 16 has 3 GB more memory, than FireStream 9250.
- FireStream 9250 is used in Desktops, and Radeon Pro Vega 16 - in Mobile workstations.
- FireStream 9250 is build with TeraScale architecture, and Radeon Pro Vega 16 - with Vega.
- FireStream 9250 is manufactured by 55 nm process technology, and Radeon Pro Vega 16 - by 14 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Radeon Pro Vega 16 is 414 MHz higher, than FireStream 9250.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 2−3 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 1−2 | 14−16 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 9−10 |
4K / 2160p | − | 6−7 |
low / 720p | 12−14 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 30−33 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro Vega 16 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 480% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
high / 1080p | 7−8 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 30−35 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 18−20 |
4K / 2160p | − | 10−11 |
low / 720p | 18−20 | 75−80 |
medium / 1080p | 7−8 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro Vega 16 in Battlefield 5 is 422% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | 35−40 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
FireStream 9250 and Radeon Pro Vega 16 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 240−250 |
medium / 768p | 95−100 | 210−220 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 130−140 |
QHD / 1440p | 35−40 | 100−110 |
4K / 2160p | 18−20 | 60−65 |
high / 768p | 70−75 | 180−190 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro Vega 16 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 137% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
low / 768p | 80−85 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | − |
medium / 1080p | 50−55 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9250 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 11% more, than Radeon Pro Vega 16. | ||
low / 768p | 75−80 | 120−130 |
medium / 768p | 50−55 | 110−120 |
ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 85−90 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro Vega 16 in Dota 2 is 109% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
high / 1080p | 3−4 | 30−33 |
ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 27−30 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 21−24 |
4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 9−10 |
low / 720p | 12−14 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 4−5 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro Vega 16 in Far Cry 5 is 540% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
high / 1080p | 10−12 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 30−33 |
QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 18−20 |
low / 720p | 50−55 | 130−140 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 80−85 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro Vega 16 in Fortnite is 258% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
high / 1080p | 8−9 | 40−45 |
ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 30−35 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 18−20 |
4K / 2160p | − | 16−18 |
low / 720p | 20−22 | 75−80 |
medium / 1080p | 10−11 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro Vega 16 in Forza Horizon 4 is 354% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 110−120 |
medium / 768p | − | 100−110 |
high / 1080p | 8−9 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 20−22 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 10−11 |
medium / 720p | 40−45 | − |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro Vega 16 in Grand Theft Auto V is 190% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
high / 1080p | 2−3 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 12−14 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 7−8 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 4−5 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro Vega 16 in Metro Exodus is 625% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
low / 768p | 85−90 | 120−130 |
high / 1080p | 85−90 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 85−90 | − |
4K / 2160p | 75−80 | − |
medium / 1080p | − | 110−120 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro Vega 16 in Minecraft is 43% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 80−85 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro Vega 16 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 111% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
high / 1080p | 6−7 | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 3−4 |
low / 720p | 7−8 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 7−8 | 24−27 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro Vega 16 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 333% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
low / 768p | 16−18 | 85−90 |
medium / 768p | 12−14 | 55−60 |
high / 1080p | 6−7 | 30−33 |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 16−18 |
4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 10−11 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro Vega 16 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 400% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
low / 768p | 80−85 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 40−45 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 45−50 |
high / 768p | 30−35 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro Vega 16 in World of Tanks is 51% more, than FireStream 9250. |
Full Specs
FireStream 9250 | Radeon Pro Vega 16 | |
Architecture | TeraScale | Vega |
Code name | RV770 | Vega Mobile |
Type | Desktop | Mobile workstation |
Release date | 16 June 2008 | 15 November 2018 |
Pipelines | 800 | 1024 |
Core clock speed | 625 MHz | |
Boost Clock | 1190 MHz | |
Transistor count | 956 million | |
Manufacturing process technology | 55 nm | 14 nm |
Texture fill rate | 25.00 | 76.16 |
Floating-point performance | 1,000.0 gflops | |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 1024 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1986 MHz | 2400 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 63.55 GB/s | 307.2 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 10.1 (10_1) | 12 (12_1) |
Shader Model | 4.1 | 6.3 |
OpenGL | 3.3 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.1 | 2.0 |
Vulkan | N/A | 1.2.131 |
Laptop size | large | |
Check Price |