GeForce 820A vs Radeon Pro Vega 16
Find out if it is worth upgrading your current GPU setup by comparing GeForce 820A and Radeon Pro Vega 16. Here you can take a closer look at graphics cards specs, such as core clock speed, memory type and size, display connectors, etc. The price, overall benchmark and gaming performances are usually defining factors when it comes to choosing between GeForce 820A and Radeon Pro Vega 16. Make sure that the graphics card has compatible dimensions and will properly fit in your new or current computer case. Also these graphics cards may have different system power recommendations, so take that into consideration and upgrade your PSU if necessary.
GeForce 820A
Radeon Pro Vega 16 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon Pro Vega 16 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon Pro Vega 16 here:
Main Specs
| GeForce 820A | Radeon Pro Vega 16 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 15 Watt | 75 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Memory type | DDR3 | HBM2 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 4 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- Radeon Pro Vega 16 has 400% more power consumption, than GeForce 820A.
- GeForce 820A is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and Radeon Pro Vega 16 uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
- Radeon Pro Vega 16 has 3 GB more memory, than GeForce 820A.
- GeForce 820A is used in Desktops, and Radeon Pro Vega 16 - in Mobile workstations.
- GeForce 820A is build with Fermi 2.0 architecture, and Radeon Pro Vega 16 - with Vega.
- GeForce 820A is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Radeon Pro Vega 16 - by 14 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Radeon Pro Vega 16 is 600 MHz higher, than GeForce 820A.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 0−1 | 24−27 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 9−10 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 6−7 |
| low / 720p | 1−2 | 45−50 |
| medium / 1080p | 0−1 | 30−33 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro Vega 16 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 4600% more, than GeForce 820A. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 30−35 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 18−20 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 10−11 |
| low / 720p | 0−1 | 75−80 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 40−45 |
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| GeForce 820A and Radeon Pro Vega 16 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 60−65 | 240−250 |
| medium / 768p | 27−30 | 210−220 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 130−140 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 100−110 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 60−65 |
| high / 768p | 16−18 | 180−190 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro Vega 16 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 596% more, than GeForce 820A. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | − |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
| GeForce 820A and Radeon Pro Vega 16 have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 120−130 |
| medium / 768p | 10−11 | 110−120 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 85−90 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro Vega 16 in Dota 2 is 313% more, than GeForce 820A. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 30−33 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 27−30 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 21−24 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 9−10 |
| low / 720p | 0−1 | 60−65 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 30−35 |
| high / 1080p | − | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 30−33 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 18−20 |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 130−140 |
| medium / 1080p | 0−1 | 80−85 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro Vega 16 in Fortnite is 513% more, than GeForce 820A. | ||
| high / 1080p | 0−1 | 40−45 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 30−35 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 18−20 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 16−18 |
| low / 720p | 0−1 | 75−80 |
| medium / 1080p | 0−1 | 45−50 |
| low / 768p | 18−20 | 110−120 |
| medium / 768p | − | 100−110 |
| high / 1080p | 0−1 | 45−50 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 20−22 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 10−11 |
| medium / 720p | 12−14 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro Vega 16 in Grand Theft Auto V is 505% more, than GeForce 820A. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 12−14 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 4−5 |
| low / 720p | 0−1 | 45−50 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 21−24 |
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 120−130 |
| high / 1080p | 27−30 | − |
| medium / 1080p | − | 110−120 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro Vega 16 in Minecraft is 62% more, than GeForce 820A. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 8−9 | 80−85 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro Vega 16 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 925% more, than GeForce 820A. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 4−5 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 3−4 |
| low / 720p | 0−1 | 45−50 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 24−27 |
| low / 768p | 0−1 | 85−90 |
| medium / 768p | − | 55−60 |
| high / 1080p | − | 30−33 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 16−18 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 10−11 |
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 14−16 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 45−50 |
| high / 768p | 12−14 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro Vega 16 in World of Tanks is 180% more, than GeForce 820A. | ||
Full Specs
| GeForce 820A | Radeon Pro Vega 16 | |
| Architecture | Fermi 2.0 | Vega |
| Code name | GF117 | Vega Mobile |
| Type | Desktop | Mobile workstation |
| Release date | 17 March 2014 | 15 November 2018 |
| Pipelines | 96 | 1024 |
| Core clock speed | 775 MHz | |
| Boost Clock | 1190 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 585 million | |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 14 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 12.40 | 76.16 |
| Floating-point performance | 297.6 gflops | |
| Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 1024 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz | 2400 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 14.4 GB/s | 307.2 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 (12_1) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 6.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | 2.0 |
| Vulkan | N/A | 1.2.131 |
| CUDA | 2.1 | |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Check Price |