GeForce 825M vs Radeon Pro Vega 16

In this comparison between GeForce 825M and Radeon Pro Vega 16 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people GeForce 825M will be the best choice, for others Radeon Pro Vega 16 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.

GeForce 825M Check Price

Radeon Pro Vega 16 Check Price

GeForce 825M and Radeon Pro Vega 16 are Laptop Graphics Cards

Note: GeForce 825M and Radeon Pro Vega 16 are only used in laptop graphics. They have lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce 825M or Radeon Pro Vega 16 here:

GeForce 825M Laptops

Radeon Pro Vega 16 Laptops

Main Specs

	GeForce 825M	Radeon Pro Vega 16
Power consumption (TDP)	33 Watt	75 Watt
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x8	PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors	None
Memory type	DDR3	HBM2
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB	4 GB
Display Connectors	No outputs	No outputs
	Check Price	Check Price

Radeon Pro Vega 16 has 127% more power consumption, than GeForce 825M.
GeForce 825M is connected by PCIe 3.0 x8, and Radeon Pro Vega 16 uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
Radeon Pro Vega 16 has 2 GB more memory, than GeForce 825M.
GeForce 825M is used in Laptops, and Radeon Pro Vega 16 - in Mobile workstations.
GeForce 825M is build with Kepler architecture, and Radeon Pro Vega 16 - with Vega.
GeForce 825M is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Radeon Pro Vega 16 - by 14 nm process technology.
Memory clock speed of Radeon Pro Vega 16 is 600 MHz higher, than GeForce 825M.

Game benchmarks


high / 1080p	0−1	24−27
ultra / 1080p	−	14−16
QHD / 1440p	0−1	9−10
4K / 2160p	−	6−7
low / 720p	2−3	45−50
medium / 1080p	0−1	30−33
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro Vega 16 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 2250% more, than GeForce 825M.
high / 1080p	−	35−40
ultra / 1080p	−	30−35
QHD / 1440p	0−1	18−20
4K / 2160p	−	10−11
low / 720p	0−1	75−80
medium / 1080p	−	40−45
low / 768p	50−55	50−55
high / 1080p	35−40	−
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
GeForce 825M and Radeon Pro Vega 16 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone.
low / 768p	55−60	240−250
medium / 768p	30−33	210−220
ultra / 1080p	6−7	130−140
QHD / 1440p	−	100−110
4K / 2160p	−	60−65
high / 768p	18−20	180−190
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro Vega 16 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 596% more, than GeForce 825M.
low / 768p	65−70	60−65
ultra / 1080p	5−6	−
medium / 1080p	45−50	55−60
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro Vega 16 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 5% more, than GeForce 825M.
low / 768p	55−60	120−130
medium / 768p	14−16	110−120
ultra / 1080p	0−1	85−90
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro Vega 16 in Dota 2 is 233% more, than GeForce 825M.
high / 1080p	−	30−33
ultra / 1080p	−	27−30
QHD / 1440p	−	21−24
4K / 2160p	−	9−10
low / 720p	0−1	60−65
medium / 1080p	−	30−35
high / 1080p	−	35−40
ultra / 1080p	−	30−33
QHD / 1440p	−	18−20
low / 720p	21−24	130−140
medium / 1080p	0−1	80−85
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro Vega 16 in Fortnite is 513% more, than GeForce 825M.
high / 1080p	0−1	40−45
ultra / 1080p	−	30−35
QHD / 1440p	−	18−20
4K / 2160p	−	16−18
low / 720p	0−1	75−80
medium / 1080p	0−1	45−50
low / 768p	18−20	110−120
medium / 768p	−	100−110
high / 1080p	0−1	45−50
ultra / 1080p	−	20−22
QHD / 1440p	0−1	10−11
medium / 720p	12−14	−
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro Vega 16 in Grand Theft Auto V is 505% more, than GeForce 825M.
high / 1080p	−	16−18
ultra / 1080p	−	12−14
QHD / 1440p	−	12−14
4K / 2160p	−	4−5
low / 720p	0−1	45−50
medium / 1080p	−	21−24
low / 768p	80−85	120−130
high / 1080p	60−65	−
ultra / 1080p	50−55	−
medium / 1080p	75−80	110−120
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro Vega 16 in Minecraft is 50% more, than GeForce 825M.
ultra / 1080p	−	14−16
low / 720p	10−11	80−85
medium / 1080p	10−11	18−20
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro Vega 16 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 400% more, than GeForce 825M.
high / 1080p	−	18−20
ultra / 1080p	−	12−14
QHD / 1440p	−	4−5
4K / 2160p	−	3−4
low / 720p	0−1	45−50
medium / 1080p	−	24−27
low / 768p	0−1	85−90
medium / 768p	−	55−60
high / 1080p	−	30−33
ultra / 1080p	−	16−18
4K / 2160p	−	10−11
low / 768p	45−50	90−95
medium / 768p	16−18	60−65
ultra / 1080p	0−1	45−50
high / 768p	12−14	55−60
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro Vega 16 in World of Tanks is 180% more, than GeForce 825M.

Full Specs

	GeForce 825M	Radeon Pro Vega 16
Architecture	Kepler	Vega
Code name	GK208	Vega Mobile
Type	Laptop	Mobile workstation
Release date	27 January 2014	15 November 2018
Pipelines	384	1024
Core clock speed	850 MHz
Boost Clock	941 MHz	1190 MHz
Transistor count	915 million
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	14 nm
Texture fill rate	30.11	76.16
Floating-point performance	722.7 gflops
Memory bus width	64 Bit	1024 Bit
Memory clock speed	1800 MHz	2400 MHz
Memory bandwidth	14.4 GB/s	307.2 GB/s
Shared memory	-	-
DirectX	12 (11_0)	12 (12_1)
Shader Model	5.1	6.3
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	1.2	2.0
Vulkan	1.1.126	1.2.131
CUDA	+
Laptop size	medium sized	large
Optimus	+
	Check Price	Check Price

GeForce 825M vs Radeon Pro Vega 16

GeForce 825M and Radeon Pro Vega 16 are Laptop Graphics Cards

Main Specs

Game benchmarks

Full Specs

Similar compares