GeForce GTX 275 vs Radeon Pro Vega 16
When choosing between GeForce GTX 275 and Radeon Pro Vega 16, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between GeForce GTX 275 and Radeon Pro Vega 16.
Radeon Pro Vega 16 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon Pro Vega 16 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon Pro Vega 16 here:
Main Specs
GeForce GTX 275
Radeon Pro Vega 16
Power consumption (TDP)
219 Watt
75 Watt
Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors
2x 6-pin
Memory type
GDDR3
HBM2
Maximum RAM amount
896 MB
4 GB
Display Connectors
2x DVI
No outputs
Check Price
Check Price
GeForce GTX 275 has 192% more power consumption, than Radeon Pro Vega 16.
GeForce GTX 275 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and Radeon Pro Vega 16 uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
GeForce GTX 275 has 892 GB more memory, than Radeon Pro Vega 16.
GeForce GTX 275 is used in Desktops, and Radeon Pro Vega 16 - in Mobile workstations.
GeForce GTX 275 is build with Tesla 2.0 architecture, and Radeon Pro Vega 16 - with Vega.
GeForce GTX 275 is manufactured by 55 nm process technology, and Radeon Pro Vega 16 - by 14 nm process technology.
Memory clock speed of Radeon Pro Vega 16 is 1266 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 275.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
6−7
24−27
ultra / 1080p
4−5
14−16
QHD / 1440p
0−1
9−10
4K / 2160p
−
6−7
low / 720p
16−18
45−50
medium / 1080p
8−9
30−33
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro Vega 16 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 222% more, than GeForce GTX 275.
high / 1080p
10−12
35−40
ultra / 1080p
10−11
30−35
QHD / 1440p
0−1
18−20
4K / 2160p
−
10−11
low / 720p
24−27
75−80
medium / 1080p
12−14
40−45
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro Vega 16 in Battlefield 5 is 213% more, than GeForce GTX 275.
low / 768p
45−50
50−55
high / 1080p
45−50
−
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro Vega 16 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than GeForce GTX 275.
low / 768p
130−140
240−250
medium / 768p
100−110
210−220
ultra / 1080p
50−55
130−140
QHD / 1440p
27−30
100−110
4K / 2160p
27−30
60−65
high / 768p
75−80
180−190
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro Vega 16 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 121% more, than GeForce GTX 275.
low / 768p
55−60
60−65
ultra / 1080p
18−20
−
medium / 1080p
45−50
55−60
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro Vega 16 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 15% more, than GeForce GTX 275.
low / 768p
75−80
120−130
medium / 768p
55−60
110−120
ultra / 1080p
30−35
85−90
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro Vega 16 in Dota 2 is 98% more, than GeForce GTX 275.
high / 1080p
8−9
30−33
ultra / 1080p
7−8
27−30
QHD / 1440p
−
21−24
4K / 2160p
3−4
9−10
low / 720p
18−20
60−65
medium / 1080p
8−9
30−35
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro Vega 16 in Far Cry 5 is 255% more, than GeForce GTX 275.
high / 1080p
14−16
35−40
ultra / 1080p
10−11
30−33
QHD / 1440p
−
18−20
low / 720p
60−65
130−140
medium / 1080p
21−24
80−85
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro Vega 16 in Fortnite is 162% more, than GeForce GTX 275.
high / 1080p
12−14
40−45
ultra / 1080p
10−12
30−35
QHD / 1440p
1−2
18−20
4K / 2160p
−
16−18
low / 720p
24−27
75−80
medium / 1080p
12−14
45−50
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro Vega 16 in Forza Horizon 4 is 258% more, than GeForce GTX 275.
low / 768p
50−55
110−120
medium / 768p
45−50
100−110
high / 1080p
12−14
45−50
ultra / 1080p
6−7
20−22
QHD / 1440p
0−1
10−11
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro Vega 16 in Grand Theft Auto V is 148% more, than GeForce GTX 275.
high / 1080p
4−5
16−18
ultra / 1080p
3−4
12−14
QHD / 1440p
−
12−14
4K / 2160p
0−1
4−5
low / 720p
12−14
45−50
medium / 1080p
6−7
21−24
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro Vega 16 in Metro Exodus is 316% more, than GeForce GTX 275.
low / 768p
90−95
120−130
high / 1080p
85−90
−
ultra / 1080p
80−85
−
medium / 1080p
90−95
110−120
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro Vega 16 in Minecraft is 30% more, than GeForce GTX 275.
high / 1080p
16−18
−
ultra / 1080p
14−16
14−16
low / 720p
30−35
80−85
medium / 1080p
18−20
18−20
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro Vega 16 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 72% more, than GeForce GTX 275.
high / 1080p
−
18−20
ultra / 1080p
7−8
12−14
QHD / 1440p
0−1
4−5
4K / 2160p
−
3−4
low / 720p
10−12
45−50
medium / 1080p
10−12
24−27
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro Vega 16 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 211% more, than GeForce GTX 275.
low / 768p
24−27
85−90
medium / 768p
16−18
55−60
high / 1080p
9−10
30−33
ultra / 1080p
6−7
16−18
4K / 2160p
−
10−11
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro Vega 16 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 242% more, than GeForce GTX 275.
low / 768p
85−90
90−95
medium / 768p
40−45
60−65
ultra / 1080p
18−20
45−50
high / 768p
35−40
55−60
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro Vega 16 in World of Tanks is 41% more, than GeForce GTX 275.
Full Specs
GeForce GTX 275
Radeon Pro Vega 16
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
Vega
Code name
GT200B
Vega Mobile
Type
Desktop
Mobile workstation
Release date
15 January 2009
15 November 2018
Pipelines
240
1024
Core clock speed
1404 MHz
Boost Clock
1190 MHz
Transistor count
1,400 million
Manufacturing process technology
55 nm
14 nm
Texture fill rate
50.6 billion/sec
76.16
Floating-point performance
673.9 gflops
Length
10.5" (267 mm) (26.7 cm)
Memory bus width
448 Bit
1024 Bit
Memory clock speed
1134 MHz
2400 MHz
Memory bandwidth
127.0 GB/s
307.2 GB/s
Shared memory
-
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
12 (12_1)
Shader Model
4.0
6.3
OpenGL
3.0
4.6
OpenCL
1.1
2.0
Vulkan
N/A
1.2.131
CUDA
+
CUDA cores
240
Bus support
PCI-E 2.0
Height
4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm)
SLI options
+
Multi monitor support
+
Maximum VGA resolution
2048x1536
Audio input for HDMI
S/PDIF
Laptop size
large
Check Price
Check Price
