GeForce GTX 285 vs Radeon Pro Vega 16
In this comparison between GeForce GTX 285 and Radeon Pro Vega 16 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people GeForce GTX 285 will be the best choice, for others Radeon Pro Vega 16 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
Radeon Pro Vega 16 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon Pro Vega 16 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon Pro Vega 16 here:
Main Specs
GeForce GTX 285
Radeon Pro Vega 16
Power consumption (TDP)
204 Watt
75 Watt
Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors
2x 6-pin
Memory type
GDDR3
HBM2
Maximum RAM amount
1 GB
4 GB
Display Connectors
2x DVI, 1x S-Video
No outputs
Check Price
Check Price
GeForce GTX 285 has 172% more power consumption, than Radeon Pro Vega 16.
GeForce GTX 285 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and Radeon Pro Vega 16 uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
Radeon Pro Vega 16 has 3 GB more memory, than GeForce GTX 285.
GeForce GTX 285 is used in Desktops, and Radeon Pro Vega 16 - in Mobile workstations.
GeForce GTX 285 is build with Tesla 2.0 architecture, and Radeon Pro Vega 16 - with Vega.
GeForce GTX 285 is manufactured by 55 nm process technology, and Radeon Pro Vega 16 - by 14 nm process technology.
Memory clock speed of Radeon Pro Vega 16 is 1158 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 285.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
7−8
24−27
ultra / 1080p
4−5
14−16
QHD / 1440p
0−1
9−10
4K / 2160p
−
6−7
low / 720p
16−18
45−50
medium / 1080p
9−10
30−33
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro Vega 16 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 222% more, than GeForce GTX 285.
high / 1080p
12−14
35−40
ultra / 1080p
10−11
30−35
QHD / 1440p
0−1
18−20
4K / 2160p
−
10−11
low / 720p
24−27
75−80
medium / 1080p
12−14
40−45
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro Vega 16 in Battlefield 5 is 213% more, than GeForce GTX 285.
low / 768p
45−50
50−55
high / 1080p
45−50
−
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro Vega 16 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than GeForce GTX 285.
low / 768p
140−150
240−250
medium / 768p
110−120
210−220
ultra / 1080p
55−60
130−140
QHD / 1440p
30−35
100−110
4K / 2160p
27−30
60−65
high / 768p
85−90
180−190
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro Vega 16 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 103% more, than GeForce GTX 285.
low / 768p
55−60
60−65
ultra / 1080p
20−22
−
medium / 1080p
45−50
55−60
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro Vega 16 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 15% more, than GeForce GTX 285.
low / 768p
80−85
120−130
medium / 768p
60−65
110−120
ultra / 1080p
35−40
85−90
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro Vega 16 in Dota 2 is 81% more, than GeForce GTX 285.
high / 1080p
8−9
30−33
ultra / 1080p
8−9
27−30
QHD / 1440p
−
21−24
4K / 2160p
4−5
9−10
low / 720p
20−22
60−65
medium / 1080p
9−10
30−35
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro Vega 16 in Far Cry 5 is 220% more, than GeForce GTX 285.
high / 1080p
14−16
35−40
ultra / 1080p
10−12
30−33
QHD / 1440p
−
18−20
low / 720p
60−65
130−140
medium / 1080p
24−27
80−85
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro Vega 16 in Fortnite is 153% more, than GeForce GTX 285.
high / 1080p
12−14
40−45
ultra / 1080p
10−12
30−35
QHD / 1440p
1−2
18−20
4K / 2160p
−
16−18
low / 720p
27−30
75−80
medium / 1080p
14−16
45−50
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro Vega 16 in Forza Horizon 4 is 230% more, than GeForce GTX 285.
low / 768p
55−60
110−120
medium / 768p
45−50
100−110
high / 1080p
12−14
45−50
ultra / 1080p
6−7
20−22
QHD / 1440p
0−1
10−11
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro Vega 16 in Grand Theft Auto V is 132% more, than GeForce GTX 285.
high / 1080p
5−6
16−18
ultra / 1080p
3−4
12−14
QHD / 1440p
−
12−14
4K / 2160p
0−1
4−5
low / 720p
12−14
45−50
medium / 1080p
7−8
21−24
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro Vega 16 in Metro Exodus is 257% more, than GeForce GTX 285.
low / 768p
95−100
120−130
high / 1080p
90−95
−
ultra / 1080p
80−85
−
medium / 1080p
90−95
110−120
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro Vega 16 in Minecraft is 26% more, than GeForce GTX 285.
high / 1080p
16−18
−
ultra / 1080p
14−16
14−16
low / 720p
30−35
80−85
medium / 1080p
18−20
18−20
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro Vega 16 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 72% more, than GeForce GTX 285.
high / 1080p
−
18−20
ultra / 1080p
7−8
12−14
QHD / 1440p
0−1
4−5
4K / 2160p
−
3−4
low / 720p
12−14
45−50
medium / 1080p
10−12
24−27
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro Vega 16 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 180% more, than GeForce GTX 285.
low / 768p
24−27
85−90
medium / 768p
16−18
55−60
high / 1080p
10−11
30−33
ultra / 1080p
6−7
16−18
4K / 2160p
6−7
10−11
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro Vega 16 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 207% more, than GeForce GTX 285.
low / 768p
85−90
90−95
medium / 768p
45−50
60−65
ultra / 1080p
20−22
45−50
high / 768p
35−40
55−60
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro Vega 16 in World of Tanks is 35% more, than GeForce GTX 285.
Full Specs
GeForce GTX 285
Radeon Pro Vega 16
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
Vega
Code name
GT200B
Vega Mobile
Type
Desktop
Mobile workstation
Release date
23 December 2008
15 November 2018
Pipelines
240
1024
Core clock speed
1476 MHz
Boost Clock
1190 MHz
Transistor count
1,400 million
Manufacturing process technology
55 nm
14 nm
Texture fill rate
51.8 billion/sec
76.16
Floating-point performance
708.5 gflops
Length
10.5" (267 mm) (26.7 cm)
Memory bus width
512 Bit
1024 Bit
Memory clock speed
1242 MHz
2400 MHz
Memory bandwidth
159.0 GB/s
307.2 GB/s
Shared memory
-
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
12 (12_1)
Shader Model
4.0
6.3
OpenGL
2.1
4.6
OpenCL
1.1
2.0
Vulkan
N/A
1.2.131
CUDA
+
CUDA cores
240
Height
4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm)
SLI options
+
Multi monitor support
+
HDMI
+
Maximum VGA resolution
2048x1536
Audio input for HDMI
S/PDIF
Laptop size
large
High Dynamic-Range Lighting (HDRR)
128bit
Check Price
Check Price