GeForce GTX 460 vs Radeon Pro Vega 16
In this comparison between GeForce GTX 460 and Radeon Pro Vega 16 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people GeForce GTX 460 will be the best choice, for others Radeon Pro Vega 16 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
Radeon Pro Vega 16 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon Pro Vega 16 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon Pro Vega 16 here:
Main Specs
GeForce GTX 460
Radeon Pro Vega 16
Power consumption (TDP)
160 Watt
75 Watt
Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors
6-pin & 6-pin
Memory type
GDDR5
HBM2
Maximum RAM amount
768 MB
4 GB
Display Connectors
2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI
No outputs
Check Price
Check Price
GeForce GTX 460 has 113% more power consumption, than Radeon Pro Vega 16.
GeForce GTX 460 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and Radeon Pro Vega 16 uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
GeForce GTX 460 has 764 GB more memory, than Radeon Pro Vega 16.
GeForce GTX 460 is used in Desktops, and Radeon Pro Vega 16 - in Mobile workstations.
GeForce GTX 460 is build with Fermi architecture, and Radeon Pro Vega 16 - with Vega.
GeForce GTX 460 is manufactured by 40 nm process technology, and Radeon Pro Vega 16 - by 14 nm process technology.
Memory clock speed of GeForce GTX 460 is 1200 MHz higher, than Radeon Pro Vega 16.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
10−12
24−27
ultra / 1080p
6−7
14−16
QHD / 1440p
1−2
9−10
4K / 2160p
−
6−7
low / 720p
24−27
45−50
medium / 1080p
14−16
30−33
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro Vega 16 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 127% more, than GeForce GTX 460.
high / 1080p
18−20
35−40
ultra / 1080p
16−18
30−35
QHD / 1440p
2−3
18−20
4K / 2160p
−
10−11
low / 720p
40−45
75−80
medium / 1080p
20−22
40−45
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro Vega 16 in Battlefield 5 is 105% more, than GeForce GTX 460.
low / 768p
45−50
50−55
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro Vega 16 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than GeForce GTX 460.
low / 768p
180−190
240−250
medium / 768p
150−160
210−220
ultra / 1080p
75−80
130−140
QHD / 1440p
45−50
100−110
4K / 2160p
30−33
60−65
high / 768p
110−120
180−190
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro Vega 16 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 55% more, than GeForce GTX 460.
low / 768p
55−60
60−65
ultra / 1080p
30−35
−
medium / 1080p
45−50
55−60
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro Vega 16 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 15% more, than GeForce GTX 460.
low / 768p
95−100
120−130
medium / 768p
80−85
110−120
ultra / 1080p
50−55
85−90
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro Vega 16 in Dota 2 is 41% more, than GeForce GTX 460.
high / 1080p
12−14
30−33
ultra / 1080p
12−14
27−30
QHD / 1440p
−
21−24
4K / 2160p
5−6
9−10
low / 720p
30−33
60−65
medium / 1080p
14−16
30−35
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro Vega 16 in Far Cry 5 is 113% more, than GeForce GTX 460.
high / 1080p
20−22
35−40
ultra / 1080p
14−16
30−33
QHD / 1440p
−
18−20
low / 720p
80−85
130−140
medium / 1080p
40−45
80−85
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro Vega 16 in Fortnite is 77% more, than GeForce GTX 460.
high / 1080p
20−22
40−45
ultra / 1080p
16−18
30−35
QHD / 1440p
5−6
18−20
4K / 2160p
−
16−18
low / 720p
40−45
75−80
medium / 1080p
21−24
45−50
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro Vega 16 in Forza Horizon 4 is 104% more, than GeForce GTX 460.
low / 768p
70−75
110−120
medium / 768p
60−65
100−110
high / 1080p
21−24
45−50
ultra / 1080p
9−10
20−22
QHD / 1440p
0−1
10−11
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro Vega 16 in Grand Theft Auto V is 75% more, than GeForce GTX 460.
high / 1080p
7−8
16−18
ultra / 1080p
5−6
12−14
QHD / 1440p
−
12−14
4K / 2160p
1−2
4−5
low / 720p
21−24
45−50
medium / 1080p
10−11
21−24
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro Vega 16 in Metro Exodus is 122% more, than GeForce GTX 460.
low / 768p
100−110
120−130
ultra / 1080p
95−100
−
medium / 1080p
100−110
110−120
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro Vega 16 in Minecraft is 14% more, than GeForce GTX 460.
high / 1080p
20−22
−
ultra / 1080p
16−18
14−16
low / 720p
45−50
80−85
medium / 1080p
21−24
18−20
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro Vega 16 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 31% more, than GeForce GTX 460.
high / 1080p
12−14
18−20
ultra / 1080p
8−9
12−14
QHD / 1440p
0−1
4−5
4K / 2160p
−
3−4
low / 720p
21−24
45−50
medium / 1080p
14−16
24−27
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro Vega 16 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 85% more, than GeForce GTX 460.
low / 768p
40−45
85−90
medium / 768p
24−27
55−60
high / 1080p
14−16
30−33
ultra / 1080p
9−10
16−18
4K / 2160p
7−8
10−11
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro Vega 16 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 100% more, than GeForce GTX 460.
low / 768p
95−100
90−95
medium / 768p
55−60
60−65
ultra / 1080p
27−30
45−50
high / 768p
45−50
55−60
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro Vega 16 in World of Tanks is 14% more, than GeForce GTX 460.
Full Specs
GeForce GTX 460
Radeon Pro Vega 16
Architecture
Fermi
Vega
Code name
GF104
Vega Mobile
Type
Desktop
Mobile workstation
Release date
12 July 2010
15 November 2018
Pipelines
336
1024
Core clock speed
675 MHz
Boost Clock
1190 MHz
Transistor count
1,950 million
Manufacturing process technology
40 nm
14 nm
Texture fill rate
37.80
76.16
Floating-point performance
907.2 gflops
Length
8.25"(210 mm) (21 cm)
Memory bus width
192 Bit
1024 Bit
Memory clock speed
3600 MHz
2400 MHz
Memory bandwidth
86.4 GB/s
307.2 GB/s
Shared memory
-
DirectX
12 (11_0)
12 (12_1)
Shader Model
5.1
6.3
OpenGL
4.1
4.6
OpenCL
1.1
2.0
Vulkan
N/A
1.2.131
CUDA
+
Bus support
16x PCI-E 2.0
Height
4.376"(111 mm) (11.1 cm)
SLI options
+
Multi monitor support
+
HDMI
+
HDCP
+
Maximum VGA resolution
2048x1536
Audio input for HDMI
Internal
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)
66 Mh/s
Laptop size
large
Check Price
Check Price
