GeForce GTX 480M SLI vs Radeon Pro Vega 16
When comparing GeForce GTX 480M SLI and Radeon Pro Vega 16, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between GeForce GTX 480M SLI and Radeon Pro Vega 16 is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
GeForce GTX 480M SLI and Radeon Pro Vega 16 are Laptop Graphics Cards
Note: GeForce GTX 480M SLI and Radeon Pro Vega 16 are only used in laptop graphics. They have lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GTX 480M SLI or Radeon Pro Vega 16 here:
Main Specs
GeForce GTX 480M SLI
Radeon Pro Vega 16
Power consumption (TDP)
100 Watt
75 Watt
Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Memory type
GDDR5
HBM2
Maximum RAM amount
4 GB
4 GB
Display Connectors
No outputs
Check Price
Check Price
GeForce GTX 480M SLI has 33% more power consumption, than Radeon Pro Vega 16.
GeForce GTX 480M SLI and Radeon Pro Vega 16 have maximum RAM of 4 GB.
GeForce GTX 480M SLI is used in Laptops, and Radeon Pro Vega 16 - in Mobile workstations.
GeForce GTX 480M SLI is build with Fermi architecture, and Radeon Pro Vega 16 - with Vega.
GeForce GTX 480M SLI is manufactured by 40 nm process technology, and Radeon Pro Vega 16 - by 14 nm process technology.
Memory clock speed of Radeon Pro Vega 16 is 1200 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 480M SLI.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
16−18
24−27
ultra / 1080p
9−10
14−16
QHD / 1440p
4−5
9−10
4K / 2160p
4−5
6−7
low / 720p
30−35
45−50
medium / 1080p
20−22
30−33
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro Vega 16 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 57% more, than GeForce GTX 480M SLI.
high / 1080p
24−27
35−40
ultra / 1080p
21−24
30−35
QHD / 1440p
9−10
18−20
4K / 2160p
6−7
10−11
low / 720p
55−60
75−80
medium / 1080p
27−30
40−45
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro Vega 16 in Battlefield 5 is 44% more, than GeForce GTX 480M SLI.
low / 768p
45−50
50−55
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro Vega 16 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than GeForce GTX 480M SLI.
low / 768p
210−220
240−250
medium / 768p
180−190
210−220
ultra / 1080p
100−110
130−140
QHD / 1440p
55−60
100−110
4K / 2160p
30−35
60−65
high / 768p
140−150
180−190
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro Vega 16 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 27% more, than GeForce GTX 480M SLI.
low / 768p
55−60
60−65
ultra / 1080p
40−45
−
medium / 1080p
45−50
55−60
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro Vega 16 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 15% more, than GeForce GTX 480M SLI.
low / 768p
110−120
120−130
medium / 768p
95−100
110−120
ultra / 1080p
65−70
85−90
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro Vega 16 in Dota 2 is 17% more, than GeForce GTX 480M SLI.
high / 1080p
18−20
30−33
ultra / 1080p
16−18
27−30
QHD / 1440p
16−18
21−24
4K / 2160p
6−7
9−10
low / 720p
40−45
60−65
medium / 1080p
21−24
30−35
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro Vega 16 in Far Cry 5 is 55% more, than GeForce GTX 480M SLI.
high / 1080p
24−27
35−40
ultra / 1080p
20−22
30−33
QHD / 1440p
16−18
18−20
low / 720p
100−110
130−140
medium / 1080p
55−60
80−85
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro Vega 16 in Fortnite is 35% more, than GeForce GTX 480M SLI.
high / 1080p
27−30
40−45
ultra / 1080p
21−24
30−35
QHD / 1440p
10−11
18−20
4K / 2160p
10−11
16−18
low / 720p
55−60
75−80
medium / 1080p
30−35
45−50
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro Vega 16 in Forza Horizon 4 is 44% more, than GeForce GTX 480M SLI.
low / 768p
90−95
110−120
medium / 768p
80−85
100−110
high / 1080p
30−35
45−50
ultra / 1080p
12−14
20−22
QHD / 1440p
4−5
10−11
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro Vega 16 in Grand Theft Auto V is 31% more, than GeForce GTX 480M SLI.
high / 1080p
10−11
16−18
ultra / 1080p
8−9
12−14
QHD / 1440p
−
12−14
4K / 2160p
3−4
4−5
low / 720p
30−35
45−50
medium / 1080p
14−16
21−24
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro Vega 16 in Metro Exodus is 42% more, than GeForce GTX 480M SLI.
low / 768p
110−120
120−130
medium / 1080p
100−110
110−120
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro Vega 16 in Minecraft is 9% more, than GeForce GTX 480M SLI.
high / 1080p
21−24
−
ultra / 1080p
18−20
14−16
low / 720p
60−65
80−85
medium / 1080p
24−27
18−20
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro Vega 16 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 8% more, than GeForce GTX 480M SLI.
high / 1080p
14−16
18−20
ultra / 1080p
10−11
12−14
QHD / 1440p
0−1
4−5
4K / 2160p
−
3−4
low / 720p
30−35
45−50
medium / 1080p
16−18
24−27
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro Vega 16 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 44% more, than GeForce GTX 480M SLI.
low / 768p
55−60
85−90
medium / 768p
35−40
55−60
high / 1080p
20−22
30−33
ultra / 1080p
10−12
16−18
4K / 2160p
8−9
10−11
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro Vega 16 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 48% more, than GeForce GTX 480M SLI.
low / 768p
100−110
90−95
medium / 768p
60−65
60−65
ultra / 1080p
35−40
45−50
high / 768p
55−60
55−60
GeForce GTX 480M SLI and Radeon Pro Vega 16 have the same average FPS in World of Tanks.
Full Specs
GeForce GTX 480M SLI
Radeon Pro Vega 16
Architecture
Fermi
Vega
Code name
N11E-GTX-A3
Vega Mobile
Type
Laptop
Mobile workstation
Release date
25 May 2010
15 November 2018
Pipelines
704
1024
Core clock speed
425 MHz
Boost Clock
1190 MHz
Transistor count
6000 Million
Manufacturing process technology
40 nm
14 nm
Texture fill rate
76.16
Memory bus width
256 Bit
1024 Bit
Memory clock speed
1200 MHz
2400 MHz
Memory bandwidth
307.2 GB/s
Shared memory
-
-
DirectX
DirectX 11, Shader 5.0
12 (12_1)
Shader Model
6.3
OpenGL
4.6
OpenCL
2.0
Vulkan
1.2.131
Laptop size
large
large
Check Price
Check Price
