GeForce GTX 750 Ti vs Radeon Pro Vega 16
In this comparison between GeForce GTX 750 Ti and Radeon Pro Vega 16 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people GeForce GTX 750 Ti will be the best choice, for others Radeon Pro Vega 16 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
Radeon Pro Vega 16 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon Pro Vega 16 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon Pro Vega 16 here:
Main Specs
GeForce GTX 750 Ti
Radeon Pro Vega 16
Power consumption (TDP)
60 Watt
75 Watt
Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors
None
Memory type
GDDR5
HBM2
Maximum RAM amount
2 GB
4 GB
Display Connectors
2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI
No outputs
Check Price
Check Price
Radeon Pro Vega 16 has 25% more power consumption, than GeForce GTX 750 Ti.
Both video cards are using PCIe 3.0 x16 interface connection to a motherboard.
Radeon Pro Vega 16 has 2 GB more memory, than GeForce GTX 750 Ti.
GeForce GTX 750 Ti is used in Desktops, and Radeon Pro Vega 16 - in Mobile workstations.
GeForce GTX 750 Ti is build with Maxwell architecture, and Radeon Pro Vega 16 - with Vega.
GeForce GTX 750 Ti is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Radeon Pro Vega 16 - by 14 nm process technology.
Memory clock speed of Radeon Pro Vega 16 is 2395 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 750 Ti.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
20−22
24−27
ultra / 1080p
12−14
14−16
QHD / 1440p
6−7
9−10
4K / 2160p
5−6
6−7
low / 720p
40−45
45−50
medium / 1080p
24−27
30−33
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro Vega 16 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 15% more, than GeForce GTX 750 Ti.
high / 1080p
30−35
35−40
ultra / 1080p
27−30
30−35
QHD / 1440p
10−12
18−20
4K / 2160p
8−9
10−11
low / 720p
65−70
75−80
medium / 1080p
35−40
40−45
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro Vega 16 in Battlefield 5 is 20% more, than GeForce GTX 750 Ti.
low / 768p
50−55
50−55
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
GeForce GTX 750 Ti and Radeon Pro Vega 16 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone.
low / 768p
230−240
240−250
medium / 768p
200−210
210−220
ultra / 1080p
120−130
130−140
QHD / 1440p
90−95
100−110
4K / 2160p
50−55
60−65
high / 768p
160−170
180−190
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro Vega 16 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 8% more, than GeForce GTX 750 Ti.
low / 768p
60−65
60−65
ultra / 1080p
50−55
−
medium / 1080p
55−60
55−60
GeForce GTX 750 Ti and Radeon Pro Vega 16 have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077.
low / 768p
120−130
120−130
medium / 768p
100−110
110−120
ultra / 1080p
80−85
85−90
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro Vega 16 in Dota 2 is 4% more, than GeForce GTX 750 Ti.
high / 1080p
24−27
30−33
ultra / 1080p
21−24
27−30
QHD / 1440p
18−20
21−24
4K / 2160p
8−9
9−10
low / 720p
50−55
60−65
medium / 1080p
27−30
30−35
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro Vega 16 in Far Cry 5 is 19% more, than GeForce GTX 750 Ti.
high / 1080p
30−35
35−40
ultra / 1080p
24−27
30−33
QHD / 1440p
16−18
18−20
low / 720p
120−130
130−140
medium / 1080p
70−75
80−85
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro Vega 16 in Fortnite is 12% more, than GeForce GTX 750 Ti.
high / 1080p
30−35
40−45
ultra / 1080p
24−27
30−35
QHD / 1440p
14−16
18−20
4K / 2160p
12−14
16−18
low / 720p
65−70
75−80
medium / 1080p
35−40
45−50
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro Vega 16 in Forza Horizon 4 is 25% more, than GeForce GTX 750 Ti.
low / 768p
100−110
110−120
medium / 768p
90−95
100−110
high / 1080p
40−45
45−50
ultra / 1080p
16−18
20−22
QHD / 1440p
7−8
10−11
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro Vega 16 in Grand Theft Auto V is 13% more, than GeForce GTX 750 Ti.
high / 1080p
12−14
16−18
ultra / 1080p
10−11
12−14
QHD / 1440p
10−11
12−14
4K / 2160p
3−4
4−5
low / 720p
40−45
45−50
medium / 1080p
18−20
21−24
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro Vega 16 in Metro Exodus is 18% more, than GeForce GTX 750 Ti.
low / 768p
120−130
120−130
medium / 1080p
110−120
110−120
GeForce GTX 750 Ti and Radeon Pro Vega 16 have the same average FPS in Minecraft.
ultra / 1080p
14−16
14−16
low / 720p
70−75
80−85
medium / 1080p
18−20
18−20
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro Vega 16 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 8% more, than GeForce GTX 750 Ti.
high / 1080p
14−16
18−20
ultra / 1080p
10−11
12−14
QHD / 1440p
1−2
4−5
4K / 2160p
1−2
3−4
low / 720p
35−40
45−50
medium / 1080p
21−24
24−27
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro Vega 16 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 28% more, than GeForce GTX 750 Ti.
low / 768p
70−75
85−90
medium / 768p
45−50
55−60
high / 1080p
24−27
30−33
ultra / 1080p
14−16
16−18
4K / 2160p
8−9
10−11
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro Vega 16 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 21% more, than GeForce GTX 750 Ti.
low / 768p
90−95
90−95
medium / 768p
60−65
60−65
ultra / 1080p
40−45
45−50
high / 768p
55−60
55−60
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro Vega 16 in World of Tanks is 3% more, than GeForce GTX 750 Ti.
Full Specs
GeForce GTX 750 Ti
Radeon Pro Vega 16
Architecture
Maxwell
Vega
Code name
GM107
Vega Mobile
Type
Desktop
Mobile workstation
Release date
18 February 2014
15 November 2018
Pipelines
640
1024
Core clock speed
1020 MHz
Boost Clock
1085 MHz
1190 MHz
Transistor count
1,870 million
Manufacturing process technology
28 nm
14 nm
Texture fill rate
43.40
76.16
Floating-point performance
1,389 gflops
Length
5.7" (14.5 cm)
Memory bus width
128 Bit
1024 Bit
Memory clock speed
5.4 GB/s
2400 MHz
Memory bandwidth
86.4 GB/s
307.2 GB/s
Shared memory
-
-
DirectX
12 (11_0)
12 (12_1)
Shader Model
5.1
6.3
OpenGL
4.4
4.6
OpenCL
1.2
2.0
Vulkan
1.1.126
1.2.131
CUDA
+
Monero / XMR (CryptoNight)
0.25 kh/s
CUDA cores
640
Bus support
PCI Express 3.0
Height
4.376" (11.1 cm)
Multi monitor support
4 displays
HDMI
+
HDCP
+
Maximum VGA resolution
2048x1536
Audio input for HDMI
Internal
3D Gaming
+
3D Vision
+
3D Vision Live
+
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)
183 Mh/s
Laptop size
large
Decred / DCR (Decred)
0.51 Gh/s
Ethereum / ETH (DaggerHashimoto)
2.3 Mh/s
Zcash / ZEC (Equihash)
74.4 Sol/s
Blu Ray 3D
+
Check Price
Check Price
