GeForce GTX 960A vs Radeon Pro Vega 16
If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between GeForce GTX 960A and Radeon Pro Vega 16, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the GeForce GTX 960A stacks up against Radeon Pro Vega 16, check out specs charts below.
GeForce GTX 960A
Radeon Pro Vega 16 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon Pro Vega 16 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon Pro Vega 16 here:
Main Specs
GeForce GTX 960A | Radeon Pro Vega 16 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 75 Watt | 75 Watt |
Interface | MXM-B (3.0) | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Memory type | GDDR5 | HBM2 |
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 4 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Check Price |
- Both graphics cards have the same power consumption of 75 Watt.
- GeForce GTX 960A is connected by MXM-B (3.0), and Radeon Pro Vega 16 uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
- Radeon Pro Vega 16 has 2 GB more memory, than GeForce GTX 960A.
- GeForce GTX 960A is used in Desktops, and Radeon Pro Vega 16 - in Mobile workstations.
- GeForce GTX 960A is build with Maxwell architecture, and Radeon Pro Vega 16 - with Vega.
- GeForce GTX 960A is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Radeon Pro Vega 16 - by 14 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GeForce GTX 960A is 2612 MHz higher, than Radeon Pro Vega 16.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 14−16 |
QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 9−10 |
4K / 2160p | − | 6−7 |
low / 720p | 24−27 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 30−33 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro Vega 16 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 108% more, than GeForce GTX 960A. | ||
high / 1080p | 20−22 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 30−35 |
QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 18−20 |
4K / 2160p | − | 10−11 |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 75−80 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro Vega 16 in Battlefield 5 is 95% more, than GeForce GTX 960A. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro Vega 16 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than GeForce GTX 960A. | ||
low / 768p | 180−190 | 240−250 |
medium / 768p | 150−160 | 210−220 |
ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | 130−140 |
QHD / 1440p | 45−50 | 100−110 |
4K / 2160p | 30−33 | 60−65 |
high / 768p | 120−130 | 180−190 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro Vega 16 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 50% more, than GeForce GTX 960A. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | − |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro Vega 16 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 15% more, than GeForce GTX 960A. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 120−130 |
medium / 768p | 80−85 | 110−120 |
ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 85−90 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro Vega 16 in Dota 2 is 36% more, than GeForce GTX 960A. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 30−33 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 27−30 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 21−24 |
4K / 2160p | 5−6 | 9−10 |
low / 720p | 30−35 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro Vega 16 in Far Cry 5 is 100% more, than GeForce GTX 960A. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 30−33 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 18−20 |
low / 720p | 85−90 | 130−140 |
medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 80−85 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro Vega 16 in Fortnite is 69% more, than GeForce GTX 960A. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 40−45 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 30−35 |
QHD / 1440p | 6−7 | 18−20 |
4K / 2160p | − | 16−18 |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 75−80 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro Vega 16 in Forza Horizon 4 is 95% more, than GeForce GTX 960A. | ||
low / 768p | 75−80 | 110−120 |
medium / 768p | 65−70 | 100−110 |
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 20−22 |
QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 10−11 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro Vega 16 in Grand Theft Auto V is 68% more, than GeForce GTX 960A. | ||
high / 1080p | 8−9 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 12−14 |
4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 10−11 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro Vega 16 in Metro Exodus is 100% more, than GeForce GTX 960A. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 120−130 |
ultra / 1080p | 95−100 | − |
medium / 1080p | 100−110 | 110−120 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro Vega 16 in Minecraft is 14% more, than GeForce GTX 960A. | ||
high / 1080p | 20−22 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 45−50 | 80−85 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro Vega 16 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 31% more, than GeForce GTX 960A. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
4K / 2160p | − | 3−4 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 24−27 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro Vega 16 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 73% more, than GeForce GTX 960A. | ||
low / 768p | 40−45 | 85−90 |
medium / 768p | 27−30 | 55−60 |
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 30−33 |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 16−18 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 10−11 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro Vega 16 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 100% more, than GeForce GTX 960A. | ||
low / 768p | 95−100 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 55−60 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−33 | 45−50 |
high / 768p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro Vega 16 in World of Tanks is 12% more, than GeForce GTX 960A. |
Full Specs
GeForce GTX 960A | Radeon Pro Vega 16 | |
Architecture | Maxwell | Vega |
Code name | GM107 | Vega Mobile |
Type | Desktop | Mobile workstation |
Release date | 13 March 2015 | 15 November 2018 |
Pipelines | 640 | 1024 |
Core clock speed | 1029 MHz | |
Boost Clock | 1085 MHz | 1190 MHz |
Transistor count | 1,870 million | |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 14 nm |
Texture fill rate | 43.40 | 76.16 |
Floating-point performance | 1,389 gflops | |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 1024 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 5012 MHz | 2400 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 80.19 GB/s | 307.2 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 (12_1) |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 6.3 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 2.0 |
Vulkan | 1.1.126 | 1.2.131 |
CUDA | 5.0 | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 180 Mh/s | |
Laptop size | large | |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- GeForce GTX 960A vs Iris Plus Graphics G4 Ice Lake 48 EU
- GeForce GTX 960A vs GeForce GTX 280M SLI
- Radeon Pro Vega 16 vs Iris Plus Graphics G4 Ice Lake 48 EU
- Radeon Pro Vega 16 vs GeForce GTX 280M SLI
- GeForce GTX 960A vs GeForce GTX 670MX SLI
- GeForce GTX 960A vs Radeon HD 7870
- Radeon Pro Vega 16 vs GeForce GTX 670MX SLI
- Radeon Pro Vega 16 vs Radeon HD 7870