GRID K520 vs Radeon Pro Vega 16
When choosing between GRID K520 and Radeon Pro Vega 16, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between GRID K520 and Radeon Pro Vega 16.
GRID K520
Radeon Pro Vega 16 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon Pro Vega 16 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon Pro Vega 16 here:
Main Specs
GRID K520 | Radeon Pro Vega 16 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 225 Watt | 75 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | HBM2 |
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 4 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Check Price |
- GRID K520 has 200% more power consumption, than Radeon Pro Vega 16.
- Both video cards are using PCIe 3.0 x16 interface connection to a motherboard.
- GRID K520 and Radeon Pro Vega 16 have maximum RAM of 4 GB.
- GRID K520 is used in Desktops, and Radeon Pro Vega 16 - in Mobile workstations.
- GRID K520 is build with Kepler architecture, and Radeon Pro Vega 16 - with Vega.
- GRID K520 is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Radeon Pro Vega 16 - by 14 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GRID K520 is 2600 MHz higher, than Radeon Pro Vega 16.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 16−18 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 14−16 |
QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 9−10 |
4K / 2160p | 4−5 | 6−7 |
low / 720p | 30−35 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 20−22 | 30−33 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro Vega 16 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 57% more, than GRID K520. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 30−35 |
QHD / 1440p | 9−10 | 18−20 |
4K / 2160p | 6−7 | 10−11 |
low / 720p | 55−60 | 75−80 |
medium / 1080p | 27−30 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro Vega 16 in Battlefield 5 is 44% more, than GRID K520. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro Vega 16 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than GRID K520. | ||
low / 768p | 210−220 | 240−250 |
medium / 768p | 180−190 | 210−220 |
ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | 130−140 |
QHD / 1440p | 55−60 | 100−110 |
4K / 2160p | 30−35 | 60−65 |
high / 768p | 140−150 | 180−190 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro Vega 16 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 27% more, than GRID K520. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | − |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro Vega 16 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 15% more, than GRID K520. | ||
low / 768p | 110−120 | 120−130 |
medium / 768p | 95−100 | 110−120 |
ultra / 1080p | 65−70 | 85−90 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro Vega 16 in Dota 2 is 17% more, than GRID K520. | ||
high / 1080p | 18−20 | 30−33 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 27−30 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 21−24 |
4K / 2160p | 6−7 | 9−10 |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro Vega 16 in Far Cry 5 is 47% more, than GRID K520. | ||
high / 1080p | 27−30 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 30−33 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 18−20 |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 130−140 |
medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 80−85 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro Vega 16 in Fortnite is 32% more, than GRID K520. | ||
high / 1080p | 27−30 | 40−45 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 30−35 |
QHD / 1440p | 10−11 | 18−20 |
4K / 2160p | 10−11 | 16−18 |
low / 720p | 55−60 | 75−80 |
medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro Vega 16 in Forza Horizon 4 is 44% more, than GRID K520. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 110−120 |
medium / 768p | 80−85 | 100−110 |
high / 1080p | 30−35 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 20−22 |
QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 10−11 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro Vega 16 in Grand Theft Auto V is 31% more, than GRID K520. | ||
high / 1080p | 10−11 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 12−14 |
4K / 2160p | 3−4 | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 30−35 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro Vega 16 in Metro Exodus is 42% more, than GRID K520. | ||
low / 768p | 110−120 | 120−130 |
medium / 1080p | 100−110 | 110−120 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro Vega 16 in Minecraft is 9% more, than GRID K520. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 60−65 | 80−85 |
medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro Vega 16 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 8% more, than GRID K520. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
4K / 2160p | − | 3−4 |
low / 720p | 30−35 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 24−27 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro Vega 16 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 44% more, than GRID K520. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 85−90 |
medium / 768p | 35−40 | 55−60 |
high / 1080p | 20−22 | 30−33 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 16−18 |
4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 10−11 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro Vega 16 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 42% more, than GRID K520. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 45−50 |
high / 768p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
GRID K520 and Radeon Pro Vega 16 have the same average FPS in World of Tanks. |
Full Specs
GRID K520 | Radeon Pro Vega 16 | |
Architecture | Kepler | Vega |
Code name | GK104 | Vega Mobile |
Type | Workstation | Mobile workstation |
Release date | 23 July 2013 | 15 November 2018 |
Pipelines | 1536 | 1024 |
Core clock speed | 745 MHz | |
Boost Clock | 1190 MHz | |
Transistor count | 3,540 million | |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 14 nm |
Texture fill rate | 95.36 | 76.16 |
Floating-point performance | 2x 2,448 gflops | |
Length | 267 mm | |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 1024 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 5000 MHz | 2400 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 160.0 GB/s | 307.2 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 (12_1) |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 6.3 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 2.0 |
Vulkan | 1.1.126 | 1.2.131 |
CUDA | 3.0 | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 76 Mh/s | |
Laptop size | large | |
Check Price |