GRID M60 2Q vs Radeon Pro Vega 16
In this comparison between GRID M60 2Q and Radeon Pro Vega 16 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people GRID M60 2Q will be the best choice, for others Radeon Pro Vega 16 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
GRID M60 2Q
Radeon Pro Vega 16 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon Pro Vega 16 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon Pro Vega 16 here:
Main Specs
GRID M60 2Q | Radeon Pro Vega 16 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 225 Watt | 75 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | HBM2 |
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 4 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Check Price |
- GRID M60 2Q has 200% more power consumption, than Radeon Pro Vega 16.
- Both video cards are using PCIe 3.0 x16 interface connection to a motherboard.
- Radeon Pro Vega 16 has 2 GB more memory, than GRID M60 2Q.
- GRID M60 2Q is used in Desktops, and Radeon Pro Vega 16 - in Mobile workstations.
- GRID M60 2Q is build with Maxwell 2.0 architecture, and Radeon Pro Vega 16 - with Vega.
- GRID M60 2Q is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Radeon Pro Vega 16 - by 14 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GRID M60 2Q is 2612 MHz higher, than Radeon Pro Vega 16.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 35−40 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 14−16 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 9−10 |
4K / 2160p | 10−11 | 6−7 |
low / 720p | 60−65 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 30−33 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 2Q in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 45% more, than Radeon Pro Vega 16. | ||
high / 1080p | 55−60 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 30−35 |
QHD / 1440p | 35−40 | 18−20 |
4K / 2160p | 18−20 | 10−11 |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 75−80 |
medium / 1080p | 60−65 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 2Q in Battlefield 5 is 50% more, than Radeon Pro Vega 16. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
GRID M60 2Q and Radeon Pro Vega 16 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 250−260 | 240−250 |
medium / 768p | 220−230 | 210−220 |
ultra / 1080p | 180−190 | 130−140 |
QHD / 1440p | 110−120 | 100−110 |
4K / 2160p | 70−75 | 60−65 |
high / 768p | 210−220 | 180−190 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 2Q in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 12% more, than Radeon Pro Vega 16. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
GRID M60 2Q and Radeon Pro Vega 16 have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 120−130 |
medium / 768p | 110−120 | 110−120 |
ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | 85−90 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 2Q in Dota 2 is 5% more, than Radeon Pro Vega 16. | ||
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 30−33 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 27−30 |
QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | 21−24 |
4K / 2160p | 14−16 | 9−10 |
low / 720p | 80−85 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 2Q in Far Cry 5 is 38% more, than Radeon Pro Vega 16. | ||
high / 1080p | 60−65 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 30−33 |
QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | 18−20 |
4K / 2160p | 27−30 | − |
low / 720p | 180−190 | 130−140 |
medium / 1080p | 110−120 | 80−85 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 2Q in Fortnite is 42% more, than Radeon Pro Vega 16. | ||
high / 1080p | 60−65 | 40−45 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 30−35 |
QHD / 1440p | 30−35 | 18−20 |
4K / 2160p | 24−27 | 16−18 |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 75−80 |
medium / 1080p | 65−70 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 2Q in Forza Horizon 4 is 43% more, than Radeon Pro Vega 16. | ||
low / 768p | 140−150 | 110−120 |
medium / 768p | 120−130 | 100−110 |
high / 1080p | 70−75 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 20−22 |
QHD / 1440p | 21−24 | 10−11 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 2Q in Grand Theft Auto V is 33% more, than Radeon Pro Vega 16. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 12−14 |
4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 2Q in Metro Exodus is 47% more, than Radeon Pro Vega 16. | ||
low / 768p | 130−140 | 120−130 |
medium / 1080p | 120−130 | 110−120 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 2Q in Minecraft is 8% more, than Radeon Pro Vega 16. | ||
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 80−85 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 2Q in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 21% more, than Radeon Pro Vega 16. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | 10−11 | 4−5 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 3−4 |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 24−27 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 2Q in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 50% more, than Radeon Pro Vega 16. | ||
low / 768p | 130−140 | 85−90 |
medium / 768p | 85−90 | 55−60 |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 30−33 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 16−18 |
4K / 2160p | 16−18 | 10−11 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 2Q in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 55% more, than Radeon Pro Vega 16. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
high / 768p | 60−65 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 2Q in World of Tanks is 3% more, than Radeon Pro Vega 16. |
Full Specs
GRID M60 2Q | Radeon Pro Vega 16 | |
Architecture | Maxwell 2.0 | Vega |
Code name | GM204 | Vega Mobile |
Type | Workstation | Mobile workstation |
Release date | 30 August 2015 | 15 November 2018 |
Pipelines | 2048 | 1024 |
Core clock speed | 557 MHz | |
Boost Clock | 1178 MHz | 1190 MHz |
Transistor count | 5,200 million | |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 14 nm |
Texture fill rate | 150.8 | 76.16 |
Floating-point performance | 4,833 gflops | |
Length | 267 mm | |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 1024 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 5012 MHz | 2400 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 160.4 GB/s | 307.2 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 12 (12_1) |
Shader Model | 6.4 | 6.3 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 2.0 |
Vulkan | 1.1.126 | 1.2.131 |
CUDA | 5.2 | |
Laptop size | large | |
Check Price |