NVS 510 vs Radeon Pro Vega 16

When comparing NVS 510 and Radeon Pro Vega 16, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between NVS 510 and Radeon Pro Vega 16 is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.

NVS 510 Check Price

Radeon Pro Vega 16 Check Price

Radeon Pro Vega 16 is a Laptop Graphics Card

Note: Radeon Pro Vega 16 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon Pro Vega 16 here:

Radeon Pro Vega 16 Laptops

Main Specs

	NVS 510	Radeon Pro Vega 16
Power consumption (TDP)	35 Watt	75 Watt
Interface	PCIe 2.0 x16	PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors	None
Memory type	DDR3	HBM2
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB	4 GB
Display Connectors	4x mini-DisplayPort	No outputs
	Check Price	Check Price

Radeon Pro Vega 16 has 114% more power consumption, than NVS 510.
NVS 510 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and Radeon Pro Vega 16 uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
Radeon Pro Vega 16 has 2 GB more memory, than NVS 510.
NVS 510 is used in Desktops, and Radeon Pro Vega 16 - in Mobile workstations.
NVS 510 is build with Kepler architecture, and Radeon Pro Vega 16 - with Vega.
NVS 510 is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Radeon Pro Vega 16 - by 14 nm process technology.
Memory clock speed of Radeon Pro Vega 16 is 618 MHz higher, than NVS 510.

Game benchmarks


high / 1080p	0−1	24−27
ultra / 1080p	−	14−16
QHD / 1440p	0−1	9−10
4K / 2160p	−	6−7
low / 720p	1−2	45−50
medium / 1080p	0−1	30−33
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro Vega 16 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 4600% more, than NVS 510.
high / 1080p	−	35−40
ultra / 1080p	−	30−35
QHD / 1440p	0−1	18−20
4K / 2160p	−	10−11
low / 720p	0−1	75−80
medium / 1080p	−	40−45
low / 768p	50−55	50−55
high / 1080p	45−50	−
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
NVS 510 and Radeon Pro Vega 16 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone.
low / 768p	60−65	240−250
medium / 768p	27−30	210−220
ultra / 1080p	7−8	130−140
QHD / 1440p	−	100−110
4K / 2160p	−	60−65
high / 768p	16−18	180−190
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro Vega 16 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 596% more, than NVS 510.
low / 768p	70−75	60−65
ultra / 1080p	0−1	−
medium / 1080p	45−50	55−60
NVS 510 and Radeon Pro Vega 16 have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077.
low / 768p	45−50	120−130
medium / 768p	10−11	110−120
ultra / 1080p	0−1	85−90
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro Vega 16 in Dota 2 is 313% more, than NVS 510.
high / 1080p	−	30−33
ultra / 1080p	−	27−30
QHD / 1440p	−	21−24
4K / 2160p	−	9−10
low / 720p	0−1	60−65
medium / 1080p	−	30−35
high / 1080p	−	35−40
ultra / 1080p	−	30−33
QHD / 1440p	−	18−20
low / 720p	21−24	130−140
medium / 1080p	0−1	80−85
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro Vega 16 in Fortnite is 513% more, than NVS 510.
high / 1080p	0−1	40−45
ultra / 1080p	−	30−35
QHD / 1440p	0−1	18−20
4K / 2160p	−	16−18
low / 720p	0−1	75−80
medium / 1080p	0−1	45−50
low / 768p	18−20	110−120
medium / 768p	−	100−110
high / 1080p	0−1	45−50
ultra / 1080p	−	20−22
QHD / 1440p	0−1	10−11
medium / 720p	12−14	−
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro Vega 16 in Grand Theft Auto V is 505% more, than NVS 510.
high / 1080p	−	16−18
ultra / 1080p	−	12−14
QHD / 1440p	−	12−14
4K / 2160p	−	4−5
low / 720p	0−1	45−50
medium / 1080p	−	21−24
low / 768p	75−80	120−130
high / 1080p	27−30	−
medium / 1080p	−	110−120
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro Vega 16 in Minecraft is 62% more, than NVS 510.
ultra / 1080p	−	14−16
low / 720p	8−9	80−85
medium / 1080p	−	18−20
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro Vega 16 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 925% more, than NVS 510.
high / 1080p	−	18−20
ultra / 1080p	−	12−14
QHD / 1440p	−	4−5
4K / 2160p	−	3−4
low / 720p	0−1	45−50
medium / 1080p	−	24−27
low / 768p	0−1	85−90
medium / 768p	−	55−60
high / 1080p	−	30−33
ultra / 1080p	−	16−18
4K / 2160p	−	10−11
low / 768p	45−50	90−95
medium / 768p	14−16	60−65
ultra / 1080p	0−1	45−50
high / 768p	12−14	55−60
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro Vega 16 in World of Tanks is 180% more, than NVS 510.

Full Specs

	NVS 510	Radeon Pro Vega 16
Architecture	Kepler	Vega
Code name	GK107	Vega Mobile
Type	Workstation	Mobile workstation
Release date	23 October 2012	15 November 2018
Pipelines	192	1024
Core clock speed	797 MHz
Boost Clock		1190 MHz
Transistor count	1,270 million
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	14 nm
Texture fill rate	12.75	76.16
Floating-point performance	306.0 gflops
Length	160 mm
Memory bus width	128 Bit	1024 Bit
Memory clock speed	1782 MHz	2400 MHz
Memory bandwidth	28.51 GB/s	307.2 GB/s
Shared memory		-
DirectX	12 (11_0)	12 (12_1)
Shader Model	5.1	6.3
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	1.2	2.0
Vulkan	1.1.126	1.2.131
CUDA	3.0
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)	17 Mh/s
Laptop size		large
	Check Price	Check Price

NVS 510 vs Radeon Pro Vega 16

Radeon Pro Vega 16 is a Laptop Graphics Card

Main Specs

Game benchmarks

Full Specs

Similar compares