Quadro 2000 vs Radeon Pro Vega 16

In this comparison between Quadro 2000 and Radeon Pro Vega 16 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people Quadro 2000 will be the best choice, for others Radeon Pro Vega 16 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.

Radeon Pro Vega 16 is a Laptop Graphics Card

Note: Radeon Pro Vega 16 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon Pro Vega 16 here:

Main Specs

  Quadro 2000 Radeon Pro Vega 16
Power consumption (TDP) 62 Watt 75 Watt
Interface PCIe 2.0 x16 PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors None
Memory type GDDR5 HBM2
Maximum RAM amount 1 GB 4 GB
Display Connectors 1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort No outputs
  Check Price Check Price
  • Radeon Pro Vega 16 has 20% more power consumption, than Quadro 2000.
  • Quadro 2000 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and Radeon Pro Vega 16 uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
  • Radeon Pro Vega 16 has 3 GB more memory, than Quadro 2000.
  • Quadro 2000 is used in Desktops, and Radeon Pro Vega 16 - in Mobile workstations.
  • Quadro 2000 is build with Fermi architecture, and Radeon Pro Vega 16 - with Vega.
  • Quadro 2000 is manufactured by 40 nm process technology, and Radeon Pro Vega 16 - by 14 nm process technology.
  • Memory clock speed of Quadro 2000 is 200 MHz higher, than Radeon Pro Vega 16.

Game benchmarks

high / 1080p 1−2 24−27
ultra / 1080p 0−1 14−16
QHD / 1440p 0−1 9−10
4K / 2160p 6−7
low / 720p 10−12 45−50
medium / 1080p 2−3 30−33
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro Vega 16 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 580% more, than Quadro 2000.

Full Specs

  Quadro 2000 Radeon Pro Vega 16
Architecture Fermi Vega
Code name GF106 Vega Mobile
Type Workstation Mobile workstation
Release date 24 December 2010 15 November 2018
Pipelines 192 1024
Core clock speed 625 MHz
Boost Clock 1190 MHz
Transistor count 1,170 million
Manufacturing process technology 40 nm 14 nm
Texture fill rate 20.00 76.16
Floating-point performance 480.0 gflops
Length 178 mm
Memory bus width 128 Bit 1024 Bit
Memory clock speed 2600 MHz 2400 MHz
Memory bandwidth 41.6 GB/s 307.2 GB/s
Shared memory -
DirectX 12 (11_0) 12 (12_1)
Shader Model 5.1 6.3
OpenGL 4.6 4.6
OpenCL 1.1 2.0
Vulkan N/A 1.2.131
CUDA 2.1
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) 31 Mh/s
Laptop size large
  Check Price Check Price