Quadro K2200M vs Radeon Pro Vega 16
Find out if it is worth upgrading your current GPU setup by comparing Quadro K2200M and Radeon Pro Vega 16. Here you can take a closer look at graphics cards specs, such as core clock speed, memory type and size, display connectors, etc. The price, overall benchmark and gaming performances are usually defining factors when it comes to choosing between Quadro K2200M and Radeon Pro Vega 16. Make sure that the graphics card has compatible dimensions and will properly fit in your new or current computer case. Also these graphics cards may have different system power recommendations, so take that into consideration and upgrade your PSU if necessary.
Quadro K2200M
Radeon Pro Vega 16 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon Pro Vega 16 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon Pro Vega 16 here:
Main Specs
| Quadro K2200M | Radeon Pro Vega 16 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 65 Watt | 75 Watt |
| Interface | MXM-A (3.0) | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | HBM2 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 4 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- Radeon Pro Vega 16 has 15% more power consumption, than Quadro K2200M.
- Quadro K2200M is connected by MXM-A (3.0), and Radeon Pro Vega 16 uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
- Radeon Pro Vega 16 has 2 GB more memory, than Quadro K2200M.
- Quadro K2200M is used in Desktops, and Radeon Pro Vega 16 - in Mobile workstations.
- Quadro K2200M is build with Maxwell architecture, and Radeon Pro Vega 16 - with Vega.
- Quadro K2200M is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Radeon Pro Vega 16 - by 14 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Quadro K2200M is 2612 MHz higher, than Radeon Pro Vega 16.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 20−22 | 24−27 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
| QHD / 1440p | 6−7 | 9−10 |
| 4K / 2160p | 5−6 | 6−7 |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 45−50 |
| medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 30−33 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro Vega 16 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 22% more, than Quadro K2200M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 30−35 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 30−35 |
| QHD / 1440p | 10−12 | 18−20 |
| 4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 10−11 |
| low / 720p | 65−70 | 75−80 |
| medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro Vega 16 in Battlefield 5 is 20% more, than Quadro K2200M. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| Quadro K2200M and Radeon Pro Vega 16 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 230−240 | 240−250 |
| medium / 768p | 200−210 | 210−220 |
| ultra / 1080p | 110−120 | 130−140 |
| QHD / 1440p | 85−90 | 100−110 |
| 4K / 2160p | 45−50 | 60−65 |
| high / 768p | 160−170 | 180−190 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro Vega 16 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 10% more, than Quadro K2200M. | ||
| low / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | − |
| medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
| Quadro K2200M and Radeon Pro Vega 16 have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 120−130 |
| medium / 768p | 100−110 | 110−120 |
| ultra / 1080p | 75−80 | 85−90 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro Vega 16 in Dota 2 is 6% more, than Quadro K2200M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | 30−33 |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 27−30 |
| QHD / 1440p | 18−20 | 21−24 |
| 4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 9−10 |
| low / 720p | 50−55 | 60−65 |
| medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro Vega 16 in Far Cry 5 is 24% more, than Quadro K2200M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 30−35 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 30−33 |
| QHD / 1440p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
| low / 720p | 120−130 | 130−140 |
| medium / 1080p | 70−75 | 80−85 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro Vega 16 in Fortnite is 12% more, than Quadro K2200M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 30−35 | 40−45 |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 30−35 |
| QHD / 1440p | 12−14 | 18−20 |
| 4K / 2160p | 12−14 | 16−18 |
| low / 720p | 65−70 | 75−80 |
| medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro Vega 16 in Forza Horizon 4 is 25% more, than Quadro K2200M. | ||
| low / 768p | 100−110 | 110−120 |
| medium / 768p | 90−95 | 100−110 |
| high / 1080p | 40−45 | 45−50 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 20−22 |
| QHD / 1440p | 6−7 | 10−11 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro Vega 16 in Grand Theft Auto V is 13% more, than Quadro K2200M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 12−14 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 12−14 |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 4−5 |
| low / 720p | 40−45 | 45−50 |
| medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro Vega 16 in Metro Exodus is 17% more, than Quadro K2200M. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 120−130 |
| medium / 1080p | 110−120 | 110−120 |
| Quadro K2200M and Radeon Pro Vega 16 have the same average FPS in Minecraft. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 70−75 | 80−85 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro Vega 16 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 8% more, than Quadro K2200M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 12−14 |
| QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 4−5 |
| 4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 3−4 |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 45−50 |
| medium / 1080p | 20−22 | 24−27 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro Vega 16 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 28% more, than Quadro K2200M. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 85−90 |
| medium / 768p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | 30−33 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 16−18 |
| 4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 10−11 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro Vega 16 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 21% more, than Quadro K2200M. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 45−50 |
| high / 768p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro Vega 16 in World of Tanks is 3% more, than Quadro K2200M. | ||
Full Specs
| Quadro K2200M | Radeon Pro Vega 16 | |
| Architecture | Maxwell | Vega |
| Code name | GM107 | Vega Mobile |
| Type | Workstation | Mobile workstation |
| Release date | 19 July 2014 | 15 November 2018 |
| Pipelines | 640 | 1024 |
| Core clock speed | 667 MHz | |
| Boost Clock | 1190 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 1,870 million | |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 14 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 26.68 | 76.16 |
| Floating-point performance | 853.8 gflops | |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 1024 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 5012 MHz | 2400 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 80 GB/s | 307.2 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 | 12 (12_1) |
| Shader Model | 5 | 6.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 2.0 |
| Vulkan | 1.1.126 | 1.2.131 |
| CUDA | 5.0 | |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Optimus | + | |
| Display Port | 1.2 | |
| 3D Vision Pro | + | |
| Mosaic | + | |
| nView Display Management | + | |
| Check Price |