Quadro K3000M vs Radeon Pro Vega 16

In this comparison between Quadro K3000M and Radeon Pro Vega 16 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people Quadro K3000M will be the best choice, for others Radeon Pro Vega 16 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.

Quadro K3000M and Radeon Pro Vega 16 are Laptop Graphics Cards

Note: Quadro K3000M and Radeon Pro Vega 16 are only used in laptop graphics. They have lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro K3000M or Radeon Pro Vega 16 here:

Main Specs

  Quadro K3000M Radeon Pro Vega 16
Power consumption (TDP) 75 Watt 75 Watt
Interface MXM-B (3.0) PCIe 3.0 x16
Memory type GDDR5 HBM2
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 4 GB
Display Connectors No outputs No outputs
  Check Price Check Price
  • Both graphics cards have the same power consumption of 75 Watt.
  • Quadro K3000M is connected by MXM-B (3.0), and Radeon Pro Vega 16 uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
  • Quadro K3000M and Radeon Pro Vega 16 have maximum RAM of 4 GB.
  • Both cards are used in Laptops.
  • Quadro K3000M is build with Kepler architecture, and Radeon Pro Vega 16 - with Vega.
  • Quadro K3000M is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Radeon Pro Vega 16 - by 14 nm process technology.
  • Memory clock speed of Quadro K3000M is 400 MHz higher, than Radeon Pro Vega 16.

Game benchmarks

high / 1080p 7−8 24−27
ultra / 1080p 4−5 14−16
QHD / 1440p 0−1 9−10
4K / 2160p 6−7
low / 720p 18−20 45−50
medium / 1080p 9−10 30−33
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro Vega 16 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 190% more, than Quadro K3000M.

Full Specs

  Quadro K3000M Radeon Pro Vega 16
Architecture Kepler Vega
Code name N14E-Q1 Vega Mobile
Type Mobile workstation Mobile workstation
Release date 1 June 2012 15 November 2018
Pipelines 576 1024
Core clock speed 654 MHz
Boost Clock 1190 MHz
Transistor count 3,540 million
Manufacturing process technology 28 nm 14 nm
Texture fill rate 31.39 76.16
Floating-point performance 753.4 gflops
Memory bus width 256 Bit 1024 Bit
Memory clock speed 2800 MHz 2400 MHz
Memory bandwidth 89.6 GB/s 307.2 GB/s
Shared memory - -
DirectX 12 (11_0) 12 (12_1)
Shader Model 5.1 6.3
OpenGL 4.6 4.6
OpenCL 1.2 2.0
Vulkan 1.1.126 1.2.131
CUDA +
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) 24 Mh/s
Laptop size large large
Optimus +
  Check Price Check Price