Radeon Pro Vega 16 vs Radeon R5 M435
Find out if it is worth upgrading your current GPU setup by comparing Radeon Pro Vega 16 and Radeon R5 M435. Here you can take a closer look at graphics cards specs, such as core clock speed, memory type and size, display connectors, etc. The price, overall benchmark and gaming performances are usually defining factors when it comes to choosing between Radeon Pro Vega 16 and Radeon R5 M435. Make sure that the graphics card has compatible dimensions and will properly fit in your new or current computer case. Also these graphics cards may have different system power recommendations, so take that into consideration and upgrade your PSU if necessary.
Radeon R5 M435
Radeon Pro Vega 16 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon Pro Vega 16 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon Pro Vega 16 here:
Main Specs
| Radeon Pro Vega 16 | Radeon R5 M435 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 75 Watt | |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
| Memory type | HBM2 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 2 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- Radeon Pro Vega 16 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Radeon R5 M435 uses PCIe 3.0 x8 interface.
- Radeon Pro Vega 16 has 2 GB more memory, than Radeon R5 M435.
- Radeon Pro Vega 16 is used in Mobile workstations, and Radeon R5 M435 - in Desktops.
- Radeon Pro Vega 16 is build with Vega architecture, and Radeon R5 M435 - with GCN 1.0.
- Radeon Pro Vega 16 is manufactured by 14 nm process technology, and Radeon R5 M435 - by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Radeon R5 M435 is 2100 MHz higher, than Radeon Pro Vega 16.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | 0−1 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 0−1 |
| QHD / 1440p | 9−10 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 6−7 | − |
| low / 720p | 45−50 | 10−12 |
| medium / 1080p | 30−33 | 2−3 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro Vega 16 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 550% more, than Radeon R5 M435. | ||
| high / 1080p | 35−40 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 2−3 |
| QHD / 1440p | 18−20 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 10−11 | − |
| low / 720p | 75−80 | 10−12 |
| medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 4−5 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro Vega 16 in Battlefield 5 is 733% more, than Radeon R5 M435. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| Radeon Pro Vega 16 and Radeon R5 M435 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 240−250 | 110−120 |
| medium / 768p | 210−220 | 80−85 |
| ultra / 1080p | 130−140 | 35−40 |
| QHD / 1440p | 100−110 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 60−65 | 9−10 |
| high / 768p | 180−190 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro Vega 16 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 180% more, than Radeon R5 M435. | ||
| low / 768p | 60−65 | 70−75 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
| medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 45−50 |
| Radeon Pro Vega 16 and Radeon R5 M435 have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 70−75 |
| medium / 768p | 110−120 | 40−45 |
| ultra / 1080p | 85−90 | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro Vega 16 in Dota 2 is 147% more, than Radeon R5 M435. | ||
| high / 1080p | 30−33 | 1−2 |
| ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 21−24 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 9−10 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 60−65 | 9−10 |
| medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 2−3 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro Vega 16 in Far Cry 5 is 950% more, than Radeon R5 M435. | ||
| high / 1080p | 35−40 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 30−33 | 5−6 |
| QHD / 1440p | 18−20 | 1−2 |
| low / 720p | 130−140 | 45−50 |
| medium / 1080p | 80−85 | 6−7 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro Vega 16 in Fortnite is 346% more, than Radeon R5 M435. | ||
| high / 1080p | 40−45 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 18−20 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 16−18 | − |
| low / 720p | 75−80 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 5−6 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro Vega 16 in Forza Horizon 4 is 685% more, than Radeon R5 M435. | ||
| low / 768p | 110−120 | 40−45 |
| medium / 768p | 100−110 | − |
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 2−3 |
| QHD / 1440p | 10−11 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | − | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro Vega 16 in Grand Theft Auto V is 306% more, than Radeon R5 M435. | ||
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | 1−2 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 0−1 |
| QHD / 1440p | 12−14 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 4−5 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 45−50 | 2−3 |
| medium / 1080p | 21−24 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro Vega 16 in Metro Exodus is 1500% more, than Radeon R5 M435. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 85−90 |
| high / 1080p | − | 55−60 |
| medium / 1080p | 110−120 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro Vega 16 in Minecraft is 43% more, than Radeon R5 M435. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
| low / 720p | 80−85 | 24−27 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro Vega 16 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 123% more, than Radeon R5 M435. | ||
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 3−4 |
| QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 3−4 | − |
| low / 720p | 45−50 | 3−4 |
| medium / 1080p | 24−27 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro Vega 16 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 900% more, than Radeon R5 M435. | ||
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 6−7 |
| medium / 768p | 55−60 | 6−7 |
| high / 1080p | 30−33 | 3−4 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 10−11 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro Vega 16 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 1060% more, than Radeon R5 M435. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 70−75 |
| medium / 768p | 60−65 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 12−14 |
| high / 768p | 55−60 | 27−30 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro Vega 16 in World of Tanks is 75% more, than Radeon R5 M435. | ||
Full Specs
| Radeon Pro Vega 16 | Radeon R5 M435 | |
| Architecture | Vega | GCN 1.0 |
| Code name | Vega Mobile | Jet |
| Type | Mobile workstation | Desktop |
| Release date | 15 November 2018 | 15 May 2016 |
| Pipelines | 1024 | 320 |
| Core clock speed | 780 MHz | |
| Boost Clock | 1190 MHz | 1030 MHz |
| Transistor count | 690 million | |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 76.16 | 20.60 |
| Floating-point performance | 547.2 gflops | |
| Memory bus width | 1024 Bit | 64 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 2400 MHz | 4500 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 307.2 GB/s | 36 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 12 (11_1) |
| Shader Model | 6.3 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 2.0 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.2.131 | 1.2.131 |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Check Price |